User talk:Crimpadre

Welcome!
Hello, Crimpadre, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Paleo Neonate  – 14:47, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Miracles of Jesus
Hello Crimpadre. While I agree with you that those miracles are only part of tradition, the lead already has a paragraph dedicated to their historicity, ending with. It appears unnecessary to add the WP:WEASELWORD. If you disagree, per WP:BRD and WP:CONSENSUS, please participate to the discussion on that article's talk page instead of simply reinstating your change. Thank you, — Paleo Neonate  – 14:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Starlite
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Starlite, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you object to some content, then start a discussion on Talk:Starlite. Thank you. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:30, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring notice
Your recent editing history at Starlite shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Policy Institute, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)