User talk:Crimson1636

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth Birch, you may be blocked from editing. Reyne2 (talk) 23:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * could you explain what your objection to is, and why you thought it was so egregious you jumped straight to a level 3 warning? You've restored a a paragraph that starts "Completely inaccurate information has been incorporated into this page ..." which is entirely inappropriate metacommentary for a Wikipedia article. &rsaquo;  Mortee  talk 23:32, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I see that you've since removed that part of the article, but I still haven't understood what makes Crimson's edit higher-order vandalism. &rsaquo; Mortee  talk 23:34, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I overreacted. I was upset that multiple users [Crimson and two IP addresses] had repeatedly removed the same sourced section of the article and replaced it with unsourced commentary about why they personally believed that section to be inaccurate. In Crimson's case, they replaced the section with material that although written in an encyclopedic style directly contradicted the actual sources included in the article. As this was Crimson's only edit in their history, I mistakenly jumped to the assumption that they were the same disruptive editor who had previously been editing the article in question. I think a level 2 warning is more appropriate in retrospect as you note. Reyne2 (talk) 20:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * thanks for explaining. The I saw was removing the commentary and didn't contradict the source, which does say that she "served as worldwide director of litigation for Apple Computer, Inc. and general counsel to Claris Corp". If they were the, a warning (L2, maybe L3) would be proper, but they were undoing that, three weeks later. Were you objecting to the removal of one of the three references in the other sentence, or was this a misunderstanding? Sorry for being persistent, I just want to make sure I understand, since you said a level 2 warning would be appropriate, and I haven't followed why. &rsaquo;  Mortee  talk 21:16, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Reading again, maybe you meant a level 2 warning was appropriate for the IP editor rather than Crimson? That'd make sense to me. I'm sorry if I'm just being dense! &rsaquo; Mortee  talk 21:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi, Crimson1636. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Mortee (talk) 16:04, 18 July 2018 (UTC)