User talk:Crimsonhaha

August 2016
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Rachel McAdams. Further, note that this kind of gossip isn't appropriate for an encyclopedia even if sourced; Wikipedia isn't a tabloid or gossip magazine. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Rumors
Hi Crimsonhaha. We don't cover rumors on Wikipedia, especially in biographies of living persons. It's both against policy and potentially libelous to make unfounded claims that people are having love affairs, etc. Please do not make such edits again or you're likely to be indefinitely blocked from editing. See also our policy on verifiability and our guideline on reliable sources. ~ Rob 13 Talk 21:17, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Karlie Kloss. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rebb ing  14:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did with this edit to Karlie Kloss.Mike1901 (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 04:52, 25 August 2016 (UTC)