User talk:Crin Antonescu

AN/I notice
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dahn (talk) 15:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello. Here is the main problem: wikipedia has a guideline that explains why potential self-entries are very problematic to handle; I am mentioning this because your edits on the article have been automatically tagged as a potential conflict of interest, and because there is clearly an issue of extreme closeness to the subject (as I gather from the picture upload). Additionally, while the article content was of poor quality, it was sourced with sources you deleted.
 * Now, whatever you decide next, I strongly urge you to familiarize yourself with wikipedia's content guidelines and policies, in particular WP:MOS, WP:POV, WP:RS, WP:V, WP:CITE and WP:NOT. Then you will perhaps note how an article is supposed to look like and what informative purpose it serves. In short, it is not a resumé, not a promotional pamphlet, not a post in a forum. Also, it is not a Twitter log: if you wish to edit an article in stages, instead of going at it bit by bit and leaving it like that (which is in itself disruptive, whatever it may be trying to achieve), I suggest you create a sandbox, by using the method outlined in the last paragraph here. In doing so, you can take all your time editing. Dahn (talk) 15:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC)