User talk:Cristiamr

File copyright problem with File:Christiana_Figueres_Heroe_for_the_Planet.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Christiana_Figueres_Heroe_for_the_Planet.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 13:45, 3 March 2010 (UTC) This photo has been posted at flickr creative commons http://www.flickr.com/photos/48140087@N06/4408227445/ and it has the proper copyright. Cristiamr (talk) 15:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Non Free Files in your User Space
Hey there Cristiamr, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Cristiamr/Christiana Figueres. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.


 * Shut off the bot here.


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:02, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Christiana Figueres.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Christiana Figueres.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 20:24, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

buen trabajo
Felicidades, está muy completo el artículo. Será que Ban Ki-Moon lo vió antes de decidir? :P --Kjell.kuehne (talk) 00:12, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest
Hello, Cristiamr. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

The edits you made to Christiana Figueres today made it look a bit more like a CV (with a long list of awards), rather than an encyclopedic article (which would be mostly prose-based and put way less emphasis on awards).

Furthermore, you used external links in the prose of the article. They need to be removed (those leading to places where you can buy books), converted into a source (see WP:reliable sources for guidance), or placed at the bottom of the article in compliance with WP:EL.

I hope that helps! I'll give you a chance to improve your edits. If the additions continue to look like a CV, I may (partially) revert them. Let me know if you have any questions. Femke (talk) 15:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)