User talk:Cristiancuev/sandbox

This is where the peer review feedback for Cristiancuev's sandbox draft content should be posted. Be sure to sign your post and complete the Canvas quiz to receive credit for your work. UWM.AP.Endo (talk) 03:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Andrew Beszhak Peer Review for Cristian
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes, definitely.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? Yes, they're both appropriate sources.

Are the citations formatted correctly? I don't see in-text citations, but they are formatted correctly in the references section.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Yes, the information he provides expands on the information already presented in the introduction in a way that makes sense.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? No, I don't think so. The information that he provides is pretty general so I think the introduction is a great place for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abeszhak (talk • contribs) 07:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Jonathan Doria Peer Review.
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes it is.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? They both seem to be secondary sources. However, when I clicked the link on the second one, it took me to a summary of a review. I don't remember if something like that is secondary or tertiary info.

Are the citations formatted correctly? No. There are no intext citations that I can click on. I also don't know which reference is used for which sentence. The references at the bottom look good although they look like they were done by hand. When you do the intext citation you can click on, references are generated at the bottom of the page automatically.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Yes it does. From what I read it seems to flow logically.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? Possibly although I don't see the need. We are only making small edits. Focusing on one part to edit will make for better edits.

AnonymousUsernam33 (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)