User talk:Cristiano Tomás/Archive 6

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monarchy of the North, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viana do Castelo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

==Conteúdo removido na página "Portugal"== Você removeu duas fotos minhas (ambas tiradas por mim, incluindo aquela do Curral das Freiras, a que tem efeito HDR) sem apresentar motivo para tal. Enquanto não providenciar uma justificação plausível para a remoção das minhas edições na página "Portugal", irei continuar a reverter as suas acções em relação àquilo que ponho na página. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacobrigo (talk • contribs) 23:16, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Sobre Line of succession to the former Brazilian throne
Prezado, antes de apagar o conteúdo e xingar desnecessariamente, peço que use a talk page. Caso o conteúdo do artigo esteja errado, por favor, corrija-o com as fontes correspondentes. Vamos tentar caminhar para um consenso, que tal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.44.53.152 (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helder Antunes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Portuguese Renaissance‏
In the mess which my email box is I found your message. I'm sorry for not replying sooner, it won't happen again. I read the article and it looks good. However, it's still lacking sources in several paragraphs. You should really consider one day picking one subject that really interests you and take some time to go to a public library (and if possible, an university library). Since you live in the US, you could do that. There are really, really amazing libraries in the US. --Lecen (talk) 18:43, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Arbitration case opened
An arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Argentine History. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Argentine History/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 12, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Argentine History/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, — ΛΧΣ  21  22:08, 29 March 2013 (UTC) —  ΛΧΣ  21  22:08, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Possible edit warring at Portuguese people
Hi. Regarding your contention with various IP's at Portuguese people, please keep in mind that edit warring is not acceptable, even if you are sure you are right and others are wrong. If the IP's continue to fight your changes, I would strongly recommend you bring up the matter at a suitable noticeboard page (such as WP:ANI, the administrators' incident noticeboard), rather than continuing to edit-war and risking being blocked yourself. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 01:39, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Let me stress what Rich said above: Do seek third party help next time, don't edit war -- as you saw it is really no long term solution, and it is just as likely to lose us a valuable editor (i.e. you) in the process. Amalthea  19:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pedro José de Mendoça Rolim de Moura Barreto, 6th Duke of Loulé


The article Pedro José de Mendoça Rolim de Moura Barreto, 6th Duke of Loulé has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 22:18, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

First off, I wish to state that I feel collaborative nominations within the Good Article project are an incredibly salutary methodology, one that implements both assured quality and efficacy into the process. This is why, especially regarding articles of immense importance, such as the subject article, I contact prior, prolific editors to the article in order to ascertain whether or not they might wish to participate in a collaborative nomination. This is why I contact you, along with a few others, in order to recruit for a nomination of the above article I am planning. I myself am a minimal contributor to the article, but have always been fascinated with the topic. Would any of you wish to collaborate on this planned nomination? Thanks! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * }

Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Pedro José de Mendoça Rolim de Moura Barreto, 6th Duke of Loulé, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Pedro I of Brazil
Porque reverteu minha edição em Pedro I of Brazil?? Veja que coloquei do mesmo modo em que esta na Wikipédia em português. Translation.  Paulo Henrique    Can talk   16:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Royal houses of Europe template
Hi, what happened to the template? How did I screw it up? >_< --Nadia (Kutsuit) (talk) 21:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Goa Inquisition
Can you explain this revert? You didn't leave any summary either. --Neelkamala (talk) 16:48, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Fernando II of Portugal
I have left my objections on the talk page of the article, feel free to comment there. Gryffindor (talk) 18:29, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for recent input on Brazil
Hi Cristiano Tomás,

thanks for your contributions on Brazil! between you and User:Vinícius18 you are putting in plenty of new stuff

take care,

Magafuzula (talk) 20:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC) |}

Displayed image size
Images beside the text should generally use a caption and the " " (thumbnail) option; the default results in a display 220 pixels wide (170 pixels if the " " option is used, 220 pixels for ), except for those logged-in users who have set a different default in their user preferences. In general, do not define the size of an image unless there is a good reason to do so: some users have small screens or need to configure their systems to display large text; "forced" large thumbnails can leave little width for text, making reading difficult. In addition, forcing a "larger" image size at say 260px will actually make it smaller for those with a larger size set as preference unless you use upright with a scaling factor, so the use of upright is preferred wherever sensible.Moxy (talk) 23:01, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Boarding
Olá Cristiano, o que tem contra a palavra "boarding"? "Embark" é o verbo ("embarcar"). O substantivo é "embarkation", mas "boarding" está perfeitamente correcto. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boarding_(transport) http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/boarding#Noun http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/boarding#Translations http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/board#Verb http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/board#Translations_2 Não sei bem para que servem medalhas e honras e tudo isso que as pessoas acumulam por aqui, eu como me mantenho afastado da confusão não tenho nada disso, pois não dou nas vistas. Tenho no entanto um sólido historial na WP em 7 línguas e odeio ser revertido 'a toa, sem razão. Reverter usa-se para algo incontrovertivelmente errado e para vandalismo. Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 08:40, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I see you have a habit of leaving unanswered what people have to say to you. And here I was thinking of being kind, leaving you a comment in Portuguese about your apparent lack of command of the English language to save you from embarassment and you merely ignored it. But there are better people other there and lots to do rather that wasting my time with the likes of you if you have no manners. Oh, apologies accepted for you reverting a properly contructed English sentence so you could keep your "The ***Embark*** of the king!!" Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 13:43, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Cristiano. Ok, so I have vented my spleen, you have vented your bile, so now let's get down to being more constructive. Like I said, I hate being reverted, and that gets my goat. Then when I saw you had been editing and did not reply to my message I went off. No, I will take this matter further, again, as I said in my first message about badges and what not, I stay away from that side of the WP.

So, if you will accept them, my apologies. I am in Lisbon about twice a year, love Sintra, have an apartment in Reboleira, perhaps we can have a beer together - on me. I am in South Africa, by the way (at the moment - I live between here, there, Namibia and sometimes Angola and Brazil. Let's work together! Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 22:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monarchy of the North, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Norte region and Chaves (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve João, Prince of Brazil
Hi, I'm Jamesmcmahon0. Cristiano Tomás, thanks for creating João, Prince of Brazil!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating the article, please improving it by adding sources and citing them in the text

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Kiernan
Keep your personal comments to yourself. I don't attack you, so do me the same favor. DrKiernan (talk) 06:51, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Rio de Janeiro
Hi Cristiano Tomás, I noticed you reverted my edit on Rio de Janeiro with a summary of "that's not the norm".

I agree, it isn't the norm, but on 20th June 2013, user Tariqabjotu deleted the section entirely. I reinstated it and after a discussion I suggested this version as a compromise.

If I could direct you to this discussion on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cities, you may be able to see my reasoning. Kind Regards -- Marek  . 69  talk 01:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Move
Hi, I see you (correctly) reverted one of new account Reifty's moves here. I'm guessing the addition of "Count.." was forced on you by a return to the original title being impossible because the move had caused an autolock. You can fix this by using the Tech Moves section on WP:RM if that was the case. I have no view. Your revert was certainly correct. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:22, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Stop
Can you stop to insert "estadunidense" at the page? 0,1% of the brazilians say this sick word. It's a offense to americans. Bluedenim (said in his edition: "nobody knows that word in Portugal". So, stop to lie. Rauzaruku (talk) 01:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Are you brazilian? No, so, shut up and go to edit Portugal articles. Here in Brazil, only stupid and sick communist people say "estadunidense" to satirize USA. Rauzaruku (talk) 01:56, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Qual fonte você tem, blog de comunista de botequim? Página de esquerdista? Rauzaruku (talk) 02:04, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Your recent editing history at Portuguese language shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Portuguese language. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:06, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

ANI
I've mentioned your name at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:55, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Subtitles on notable citizenry
Oi, Cristiano. I just wanted to note, I edited the subtitle you used on the Angra do Heroísmo to "remediate" an issue. By using the heading "Notable residents and citizens" it would create a precedent for future use. In the past, these types of lists would balloon into unmanageablely long lists of people who resided in the locations. Although not terribly large for small locations, it becomes desperately large for places like [Porto], where the list included artists, poets, politicians, etc., who, for however brief, visited or lived in the city. I hope you understand the logic in dropping the "residents" from that title. ruben jc ZEORYMER  (talk) 08:39, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup
You are invited to "Come Edit Wikipedia!" at the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, July 27th, 2013. There will be coffee, cookies, and good times! -- Olegkagan (talk) &mdash; Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 04:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Portugal
Acho que é um pouco tarde para avisar, mas não me custa nada. Não é mais necessário procurar o livro de fotografias que pedi. Um wikipedista português que possui o livro me contou que não há fotos de Maria II. --Lecen (talk) 12:23, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited House of Braganza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leonor of Aragon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Duke of Beja
Was John, Lord of Reguengos de Monsaraz ever Duke of Beja? You might want to check the recent changes on those related articles.--The Emperor&#39;s New Spy (talk) 19:23, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * No he was not; that's nonsense. Thanks, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 20:18, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Also Duke of Beja and Infante João, Duke of Beja, this may have raised from a problematic source.--The Emperor&#39;s New Spy (talk) 20:27, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh I see the confusion, no problem. Mistakes happen. Cheers, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 20:38, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It's not my mistake. It was another editor's mistake.--The Emperor&#39;s New Spy (talk) 20:39, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Do not call me an idiot. DrKiernan (talk) 21:54, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DrKiernan (talk) 22:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Please begin following WP:NPA immediately. You should consider this an analogue to uw-npa3, which I was going to issue until I remembered WP:DNTTR.  Nyttend (talk) 22:15, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup
Help build the Wikipedia community in Southern California at "Come Edit Wikipedia!" presented by the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, August 31st, 2013 from 1-5pm. Drop in for some lively editing and conversation! Plus, it's a library, so there are plenty of sources. --Olegkagan (talk) &mdash; Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 02:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)