User talk:Cristiano Tomás/Archive 9

Muito obrigado!
Cristiano, boas notícias. O artigo sobre o Rosas é um FA agora. Muito obrigado por ter o apoiado. Sou muito grato. Um grande abraço! --Lecen (talk) 02:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Humberto Delgado
Hello Cristiano. What is your take on this edit? Shouldn't it be sourced? Is it relevant? Gerard von Hebel (talk) 05:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * He did come up with a source. I changed the lady's name however. That name is still contentious as well, as we have no source for what she was called officially. Not even in her own article. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 17:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Portugal
Olá Cristiano. Tudo bem? Please have a look at the last edit on Portugal. An IP has by the looks of it 'updated' figures and it looks lke a good faith edit. My concern is that not only has the IP not provided sources, he/ she left the sources that were there already, which means that now all the sournces point to a year ago, with information for this year. Um abraço, Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 03:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

The move of the 138301385 crises
This move, what do you think?

A page you started (Portuguese Riviera) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Portuguese Riviera, Cristiano Tomás!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I've added a few citations - hope that's OK."

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for May 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Portuguese Riviera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oeiras. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Adrian Romay-Habsburg
Hello User:Cristiano Tomás. You may be somewhat interested in this article. I've tagged it as a hoax and candidate for speedy deletion on this Wiki and on the Spanish one. I can't seem to get to the Portuguese copy (which is extant on the Portuguese wiki) because I don't know any Portuguese, but I would like to tag it there as well. I feel this is an exercise in self aggrandizement but I'n not able to tag it as a hoax there. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 15:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The article on the English language Wikipedia has been deleted. The Portuguese article can be found here. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 16:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The Portuguese page has been deleted as well... Ok Thanks anyway, as always! Gerard von Hebel (talk) 16:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * You should have seen it. It was hilarious! It got me a legal threat (in my mailbox), which made it easier to have the user involved blocked on two Wikipedia's and the article deleted on three of them. I'm not expecting the lawyers of His Imperial and Royal Highness to turn up at my doorstep any time soon though... Gerard von Hebel (talk) 19:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Anjo
Hello User:Cristiano Tomás, I'm afraid our friend Anjo is at it again....

see his latest contributions.

I would be interested what you think about this edit. There have been others like it by Anjo. Four surnames of all grandparents with the maternal ones first? I don't know, it might be a Portuguese habit... I wouldn't know. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 19:26, 19 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid Anjo made his fourth revert and it has come to this on the 3RRV notification board. I'm staying away from the article for now. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 19:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Who promoted the revertions was not me, but the other user (Gerard von Hebel). He intends to win the community by "fatigue" through its constant revertions on a matter which he is not understood. Please verify that he also has eliminated information that remains verifiable literature sources. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 20:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Or was it Manuel I? see this diff. Thanks for you action that was probably wise. Another issue would be the claim by MP that Carlos I made her an heir at birth, which is also unproven and which he had no constitutional right to do. If we mention MP at all that should also be in the equation, but perhaps that is for later or for the afterthought that the less said about this the better..... Gerard von Hebel (talk) 23:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Cristiano Tomás, I think it's great what you wrote there. But I would leave out the Rosario Podimani section..... Gerard von Hebel (talk) 23:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Good text! Very well done! Gerard von Hebel (talk) 23:28, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * What do you think of this and the edits thereafter? Gerard von Hebel (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I made a few additional changes to the "pact" section and reverted (almost) back to the original text you wrote yesterday. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 20:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but the whole thing seems to fall on it's face again...... Gerard von Hebel (talk) 21:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Now cleary we can see that Gerard von Hebel is playing with our face, Cristiano! He is replacing the fantasy titles as if they were true titles of royalty; he is eliminating all the Infobox/Pretenders in Miguelist pretender articles (and tell that they are real members of royalty in a Republic); he is are reverting all information (mine and now even yours) just to promote lies and in a brazenly non-neutral way... and are trying to accuse me. I ask your help. We can not allow lies in Wikipedia. I'm constructing a consensus with you, but Hebel is trying to destroy all. See his editings... Anjo-sozinho (talk) 21:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Now you are acting as Hebel. I cannot accept that. You cannot tell that Duarte Pio and other Miguelist pretenders "reign" because that is false. You have any reference about "Kings Duartes" that never exists. If you don't accept treat Maria Pia's article with dignity, you cannot come to ask me to accept the lies published in Miguelist articles. Duarte Pio's wife is now the Royal Princess of Portugal? LOL. Even a person that doesn't know anything about History of Portugal knows that it is a giant foolish. I will not accept false information based in non-neutral points of view. I will appeal to adminsitration and to many other users to help me to resolve the false information that you and Hebel are publishing about this subject. I believed we were to build a consensus, but then I saw that even this is false. I'm really sorry that you had changed that, believe me. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 22:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ...and now you and Gerard von Hebel are combining in your personal discussions page a way to block me just to silence the truth that I'm being reported. This is the new policy of Wikipedia? I saw it here. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 23:44, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Self defense from attacks
I have the right to defend myself yet you and Hebel only want to silence me. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 23:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

mail
Gerard von Hebel (talk) 01:44, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Now, secret combinations to silence me? Very well.. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 17:53, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Cristiano
Sorry about the situation in which I sent you that e-mail, but I got into somewhat of a fix about that with an admin... Never mind about that however. I see that you are posting a disclaimer about the situation now, whenever it arises. Which is a good strategy. I know you're tired of the situation and whenever it rises again, it has risen recently because of my actions. Sorry about that. My recent actions are about two matters. I have been experiencing some vandalism on my user page. Probably caused by recent matters in which I have been involved. Probably not Anjo I think, but there was also the matter of bringing the "first mention" matter in the Maria Pia article around. I thought that this was a good moment to do it. So I did that using parts of your text. I do hope we're OK. Friendly greetings, Gerard von Hebel (talk) 20:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portuguese Africa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Portugal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Portuguese language literature and Magnum opus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, I'm CorbieVreccan. I noticed that you recently removed some content from David Archambault II without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Co rb ie V    ☊ ☼ 23:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

San Jose, California
Thank you for adding this edit to San Jose, California. I notice you added three sources to reference the addition of the word "affluent". Could you please remove duplicate sources? This helps reduce unnecessary clutter. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:29, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hernando Martel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fray ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Hernando_Martel check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Hernando_Martel?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Postage stamps and postal history of the Niassa Company
--Bejnar (talk) 19:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks and a request
Nice work on Washington, D.C.. May I ask though that you summarize what you're doing, there and elsewhere, with edit summaries? It helps other editors understand what you're trying to accomplish, and can save them a bit of time - particularly on pages like DC, that get a lot of unwanted or incompetent attention, where it's become kind of a habit to review any extensive new work on the page. Thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 18:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Dab links
Hope that makes some sense re the San Jose disambiguation link. The idea is to keep the What Links Here from article space empty. 

Any entries on that page are treated by the disambiguation project as an error that needs fixing, so it's helpful for us to keep the deliberate links pointing to the redirect. Thanks! &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 13:19, 2 March 2018 (UTC)