User talk:Cristina Late

Welcome!
Hello, Cristina Late, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Oculyze GmbH, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oculyze GmbH (January 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nearlyevil665&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665  14:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oculyze GmbH (February 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slywriter&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oculyze GmbH (March 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pythoncoder&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 06:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oculyze GmbH (March 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hatchens&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 05:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oculyze GmbH (March 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mako001 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mako001&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 13:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oculyze GmbH (August 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gusfriend&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 11:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking the time to review my page (Draft:Oculyze GmbH), Gusfriend! You were right and I now implemented your recommendation. Take care! Cristina Late (talk) 13:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oculyze GmbH (November 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timtrent&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello Cristina Late. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Oculyze GmbH, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cristina Late. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * It seems to me to be impossible for you to state that this is not the case. I note https://www.oculyze.net/company/about/ 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:51, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, Timtrent!
 * Well, I congratulate you for being so thorough in checking my whereabouts and making assumptions regarding my relationship with the company for which I created this draft. Now my recommendation would be to use the same thoroughness and diligence in trying to prevent and maybe eliminate the extortion system that right now the Wikipedia editors are condoning, if not downright participating in.
 * Yes, I have a relationship with the company. As I am certain you very well know, all company pages on Wikipedia are created by people who have some sort of connection with those companies. However, I was not compensated for creating or editing the page, neither directly, nor indirectly, and the page was written in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines.
 * You’ve schooled me on the Wikipedia guidelines on this topic, but what is Wikipedia’s policy on editors attempting extortion? Since I first created the page the company has received several “offers” from Wikipedia editors, promising that they could get the page published for a certain amount of money. And the page was always rejected after they said “no, thanks” to one of these offers. Coincidence, right?
 * Now, I would not venture as far as to say that you are one of them, although, to use your own words, “it seems to me to be impossible for you to state that this is not the case.”
 * So kindly flag the page, reject it, or do anything else that you think is necessary. Just please spare me the righteous speech on why you’re doing it.
 * As for the “notability” issue, I can easily list dozens of companies which, despite the fact that are far from notable, have found their way into being published on Wikipedia, most certainly via accepting an “offer” from your fellow editors. More importantly, though, the decision on whether a page is “notable” or not is often biased, either because the editor has some sort of interest or s/he is simply not qualified to assess the notability of a company in a field s/he knows little or nothing about. This often makes it look far more like a censoring than an editing process.
 * C. Cristina Late (talk) 07:59, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for declaring your paid status in this reply. YoU are entitled to revise the draft to make it acceptable, we just needed to be clear in your status.
 * If you have information on Wikipedia editors attempting extortion please lodge that with WP:VRT and action will be taken.
 * I dislike your veiled accusation against me. I cannot be bothered to suggest that you withdraw it. I can tell you with clarity that I dislike any paid editing, but accept that it happens. Provided it is within our rules then it is acceptable. You are paid, however, to do the entire job, form learning the rules to creating a draft that can be accepted. You are paid by your employer to learn in their time, and to draft in their time. Indeed, you are paid to put the banner up on your user page stating that you are paid. You have not yet done so.
 * As for the "other" articles, please feel free to nominate them for deletion rather than complaining about them. Be part of the solution, not part of the problem. Wikipedia has many thousands of poor articles and a remarkably small number of editors who chase them down. A great number of these poor articles are legacy articles from when the rules were less stringent. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi again! So you claim that I am paid by the company to write this page and then you mark the page as a possible copyright violation for using the materials (images, text?) from an interview with Oculyze posted on another website? You do realize that it does not make any sense? Why would I need to take any kind of material from another website when, according to you, I could easily get it from Oculyze?
 * My accusation was not veiled, it was as straightforward as it gets. You rejected the page on November 5th and on November 6th this “offer” was sent to the company:
 * Hi,
 * I checked your Wikipedia declined draft;
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Oculyze_GmbH
 * I am an experienced Wikipedian. I will do online research and rewrite the content in an encyclopedic tone, format the draft according to Wikipedia guidelines and get it approved, I will forward the final draft for you to review before submitting it.
 * Kindly reply for more details.
 * Best regards,
 * Laura
 * First off, I do not believe in coincidences. Secondly, you are now obviously targeting me and the page I’ve created (see the copyright violation accusation) so yes, I do think it is very likely that this was an offer sent by you. As for being part of the solution, you can bet that I will do my best to fight this and that I will file a formal complaint. I stopped caring a long time ago about whether this page actually gets accepted. The only thing that motivated me to edit and resend it was the fact that I wanted to see if I could manage to beat this extortion system. And you can be certain that I will not stop here. Cristina Late (talk) 07:18, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * This is nowhere near the first report of "I saw your article was declined, pay me and I'll fix it." we have seen on Wikipedia. To accuse someone, without actual specific evidence, is a violation of our WP:AGF guideline, so please stop doing that. No question thre are many bad articles, and articles written covertly by companies to promote themselves, and articles written in completely good faith about themselves. That you apparently can't envision someone writing an article about a company unless that person is affiliated or paid by that company is perhaps a common thought among those who work in the PR/advertising world, but it's a false claim and only a shortcoming on your part, not ours. As others have said, highlight any specific problems you find, and someone will look into it. DMacks (talk) 08:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, DMacks! Thank you for your message.
 * Ok, first off, of course that the editors would not send such an obvious message – “pay me and I’ll publish your page.” But, I say it again, these offers always come immediately after the draft is rejected (on flimsy grounds), so it is not difficult to make the connection. Also, you must know about the scandals Wikipedia has been a part of in the past, when editors would do exactly that: target small companies and individuals to ask for money in exchange for getting their pages published on Wikipedia. If you don’t know about it, you can look it up. The “operation” even has its own page on (ironically enough) Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orangemoody_editing_of_Wikipedia
 * Here is another source: https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/wikipedia-rocked-by-rogue-editors-blackmail-scam-targeting-small-businesses-and-celebrities-10481993.html
 * "[…] The scam worked by targeting firms struggling to get pages about their businesses on Wikipedia. They were often told their articles had been rejected due to concerns of excessive promotional content – although in some cases the scammers themselves may have been the ones causing the articles to be removed. […]”
 * Secondly, I did not say that I cannot envision someone writing an article about a company “unless that person is affiliated or paid by that company”, I said that these kinds of pages are typically created by people who “have some sort of connections with those companies.” Even if it is written in what you call “good faith” (meaning, as you seem to understand it, that there is no conventional compensation whatsoever) most of the time people still have some sort of interest in that particular company to put the time into writing about it. Otherwise, there are other many far more interesting topics to write about.
 * Last but not least, I understand you asking me to stop accusing people without specific evidence. In principle, you are right, and I will tone it down for the sake of keeping the conversation civilized. However, you should also reconsider making assumptions about a whole industry – and what the line of thought is “in the PR/advertising world.” You should also try to understand my frustration – I know this is extortion, but I do not have a clear way to prove it or to provide “specific evidence.” I will document, though, every offer that was received by the company and the timing and I will file, as I said, a formal complaint.
 * All the best,
 * C. Cristina Late (talk) 11:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation will be grateful for any report that can identify positively any editor touting for business in this way. A behind the scenes investigation (0.99 probability) will be held, and offending accounts will be blocked.
 * Of course we have editors who are less than straightforward in the way they work here. How could we not? Anyone may edit here. All new editors are taken at face value unless and until they come to our attention as being unusual in some manner.
 * Of course we have unscrupulous people trawling recent AFC declines, recent nominations for deletion, and sending cold canvassing spam messages to those who appear to have money and wish for an article.
 * Thank you for collating the information to lodge a complaint. Please do not report your information in public forum . Please read Articles for creation/Scam warning and report using that mechanism.  Even if you are unsure that the information you have is sufficient, please report it by that route anyway.
 * Despite your making this personal against me I wish you well. If you do the work on that draft and can show the corporation to pass WP:NCORP it will be accepted. Since I try very hard not to review a draft more than once I doubt we will meet again. Please under no circumstances accept any offer by anyone to create the draft for pay. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, it’s my right to make my experience public, though, even if not on Wikipedia, as others may learn something from it. I know I have.
 * Of course, I will not accept any offers. I haven’t gone this far to give in now. Cristina Late (talk) 07:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oculyze GmbH (November 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Compusolus&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Compusolus (talk) 23:28, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oculyze GmbH (January 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oculyze GmbH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slywriter&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze_GmbH reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 19:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oculyze (January 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oculyze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CNMall41&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 01:06, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oculyze (April 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GMH Melbourne was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oculyze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GMH_Melbourne&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oculyze reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  09:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I cannot see any table. Cristina Late (talk) 10:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Oculyze
Hello, Cristina Late. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oculyze, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Oculyze


Hello, Cristina Late. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oculyze".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 10:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)