User talk:Croclover

Croclover, I can see you are upset about this but you need to get over it. A number of other editors agreed to a redirect - yours was the single dissenting voice. If you start calling people names you will be blocked. -- I@n 23:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I was not the single dissenting voice. That proves you are a liar. You have no right to delete my work. What makes your opinion better than mine and the Australian public? How dare you call little Bindi a non-entity. You lot are the non-entities. Wannabe editors with no talent or grey mass between the ears. Go to hell you anti-australian pack of ignorant goats. Croclover 23:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Apologies, you weren't the only one - my mistake -- I@n 00:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

No personal attacks, please
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —Whomp t/c  23:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.


 * Vandalize a page!!!! You are the vandals deleting important pages. Shame on the lot of you! VANDALS!!! Croclover 23:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Those important pages already exist at more suitable titles. -- Longhair 23:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


 * What pages? What are you on about? I've helped create a page. All you've done is delete one. Despicable! Croclover 23:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


 * See Terri Irwin, Steve Irwin, and also the recent discussion concerning the redirect of Bindi Irwin. -- Longhair 23:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

If you want the outcome at Bindi Irwin reconsidered, do it through WP:DRV. I doubt you'll be successful, particluarly if you ask for a review in the same tone you're using now. Your current course of reposting the material will get you blocked. Gazpacho 23:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

This is the most corrupt and dictatorial website I've ever encountered in all my years on the internet. Stop talking gibberish. It says on the front page of wicipidia that anybody can edit it. Then you stop any editing you don't like and spout off obscure rules. What a lot of rot. I work at Australia Zoo and find your comments about Bindi both ignorant and insulting. Clearly you know nothing about Australia and none of you should be allowed to edit so much as a high school rag. Pure ignorance. You know nothing about anything. My time is expensive and I wrote those additions to the Bindi page because a lot of people are interested in the Irwins. Nobody on the other hand gives a hoot about your opinions. Revert the page to Bindi or I'll put a reference to this at crocodilehunter.com describing your insensitive stance and utter ignorance. I'm the webmaster for Australia Zoo. I don't make idle threats either. You people sicken me. Croclover 23:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Who you are makes no difference to how we expect you to act here. There's established rules to follow, and article names exist at proper titles for a reason. It's obvious you're new to Wikipedia, so please cool off and take the time to learn a little about how we operate here. You've been blocked for disruption for 24 hours. Once that block expires we welcome you back to contribute in a non-disruptive fashion. Making personal attacks on other editors will only see your account blocked once again. -- Longhair 00:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Here's something that might surprise you: the article on Bindi Irwin was not deleted. It was redirected, which leaves the text in the article history, so you got yourself blocked over nothing really. I'll re-open the discussion on the article and put in a request for you to be unblocked so that you can comment, but any new attempts to disrupt the process will get you blocked. the discussion is at Articles for deletion/Bindi Irwin. Gazpacho 00:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


 * This blocked user ( [ block log] | autoblocks | [ unblock] | contribs ) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request. Request reason: "See previous comment" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 00:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Bye bye Suckers!
Time to throw you guys another bone. Seeing as you haven't even figured out my goals here. Makes it less boring beating you all the time.

The only reason I told Yales at my website about what was happening here is that its too late for him to make any difference. Try googling 'Bindi Irwin' and you'll understand. Wikipedia doesn't get all that many hits to its external links on pages but is great for webcrawlers.

I currently have about 340 links listed on your pages. When they get to the top of search engines I redirect them. Get it?

Ta ta you morons! Croclover 02:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

-- Longhair 02:24, 12 September 2006 (UTC)