User talk:Crossleague

Hi,

I noticed that you added India as a new ecclesiastical district outside the Philippines. I still can't see it in INCmedia.org. I believe India can't support an E.D. for they only have very few congregations and GWS. Do you have a valid source that will tell us otherwise?

Thanks.

Fcbelmontejr (talk) 22:31, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Hello, I'm JoeSperrazza. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Iglesia ni Cristo because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. JoeSperrazza (talk) 21:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Hello, I'm WikiLeon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Iglesia ni Cristo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. w L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 02:50, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

It's verifiable. Stop your biased pro-INC editing.
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Iglesia ni Cristo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Ironbrew (talk) 09:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed a number of your recent edit s to Iglesia ni Cristo does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! w L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 22:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

stop it
Stop reinserting inappropriate blog reviews - we only use reliably published sources with professional reviews. Also stop inserting trivial fancruftian divisions of the cast : we identify main cast and supporting cast only, and certainly dont hagiography the characters as "pioneers" -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  03:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * see Manual_of_Style/Film we only use professional reviews. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  03:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * i urge you to actually read the WP:NPOV policy, particularly the parts about where we do not attempt to create a false balance by presenting non-mainstream opinions as if they are equal to the professionals. .--  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  03:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Felix Manalo (film). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 03:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.