User talk:Crow/Archive 1

__NOINDEX__

Welcome!
they arent a grime super group, so stop editing it to say they are. they are just a crew. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.41.61 (talk) 14:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, Electric Wombat! Thank you for your contributions. I am Buffbills7701 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! buffbills7701 01:11, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Reverting Vandalism
You're doing a great job, however I want to remind you to give the vandals some warnings. Thank you! buffbills7701 01:12, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I will do so, and thanks! Electric Wombat (talk) 01:13, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Have a look at WP:User warnings for more information. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 15:10, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roy Peterson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Regarding your reversal of my edit on the land banking page: it wasn't fixing content, but poor comma use. Most of the edits I do are fixing bad writing: are those fine? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:101:F000:700:A02F:91E3:B749:DBB6 (talk) 15:12, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your message. Apologies for the confusion regarding your edit to Land Banking. While you were fixing the comma use, it appears you inadvertently removed a letter from a word. That's what made me undo your edit. Many times, people "playing around" on Wikipedia will do subtle things like that, so when I saw the letter drop, I assumed it was one more of those. Of course, you fixing grammar and punctuation is absolutely welcomed! Electric Wombat (talk) 15:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Camera, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  A m i t  웃  16:48, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I assume this was meant for the vandal whom I reverted, yes? Electric Wombat (talk) 16:51, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, Yes, my mistake, please accept my apologies.  A m i t  웃  16:55, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Not a problem! Electric Wombat (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Vínland
Hello, sorry for writing here if it is the wrong place. I don't know how to message you (if that is possible). Letting you know I have replied to your contact. Erm... let me know somehow. thanks. (delete when ready) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuckwitt (talk • contribs) 02:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

United Popular Front
Hey there, orry if this is the wrong way ton contact you. What would be a good example of a similar page to model on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.49.204.205 (talk) 03:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Omar Abdullah Twitter Info
Hey, I don't think my contribution is not constructive. People used to post controversial things about the celebs, which happened in their professional and personal life. If they can post so what about my whole info. He is so active & famous that his parody is also getting famous because of him only. I don't find anything wrong in this. Even this is not controversial. This is simple info which I want to share with rest of world. I don't know why Wiki is hesitating in publish this information. My contribution is very simple and true. Not even blaming Omar Abdullah. It is as simple as drinking water. Still, I am confused why my contribution is not published fully. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homespun33 (talk • contribs) 18:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi User:Homespun33, sorry I've been away for a few weeks so I could not get back to you sooner. I had to look through the background of your question, since I don't recall having any involvement there. It seems that a person's social network presence is not something that is appropriate to include in their article, unless their whole reason for having an article in the first place stems from that. Take Ashton Kutcher, for example. At one point I believe he had the record for the most Twitter followers of any user (or was the most active twitterer, something like that), yet this is not mentioned in his article, as it is not really relevant. So while your edit was obviously made with good intentions, it was just not the kind of thing the Wikipedia community has decided belongs in an article. I hope this helps! Electric Wombat (talk) 23:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Wombat for your reply. If you think Twitter information is irrelevant then Twitter official page from Wikipedia should be removed. I think you are not aware of the power social media. One more thing, then why the information of Film is published on his page. Is it relevant? And few days back IBN media has published the news of 12 Indian Twitter parody accounts you need to follow and one of them is Omar Abdullah's parody account. Is it possible from your end to update this article on Main page of Omar's profile. http://ibnlive.in.com/news/10-indian-parody-accounts-on-twitter-you-need-to-follow/453444-79.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homespun33 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi again User:Homespun33! The issue here is that a person's Twitter activities are not considered "encyclopedic" by the Wikipedia community, unless the whole reason for even having an article is related to Twitter. These decisions come about as a result of discussion that forms a consensus, so I would be out of place adding it back myself as you suggest. I see you asked about this already on the article's talk page, which is the correct place to discuss inclusion in that article, though unfortunately nobody else seems to want to respond. Repeatedly adding it back after several others have said it doesn't belong is not the way to go, though. Now, the External Links policy does seem to imply that in the External Links section of the page, you may include a link to his official account, but discussion of his followers and parody accounts would not be appropriate there, but rather just a link. Hope this helps. Electric Wombat (talk) 00:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Electric Wombat,

Thanks for your reply. I have edited the page. I have added two Article link regarding his twitter article and also added one line. Please check and let me know whether the addition is correct or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homespun33 (talk • contribs) 14:02, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

explaining sizes of viruses in introductory article
I agree that nanometers is a bit daunting in an introductory article, but I think we should find a better way to explain sizes of viruses than saying they are around 1/100 the size of bacteria, because it's not clear whether we are talking volume or linear dimensions, and both bacteria and viruses come in a variety of shapes, some quite elongated, so even their linear size is rather ambiguous. There is a nice chart comparing sizes of molecules, viruses, bacteria, and eukaryotic cells at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Relative_scale.svg, but alas it would not be directly suitable for an introductory article, because of its logarithmic scale. Further down, the picture of the HIV viruses on a lymphocyte says better than a thousand words how much smaller viruses are than eukaryotic cells. Maybe we could say something like viruses are around 10 to 100 times smaller than bacteria in linear dimensions and 1000 to 10,000 times smaller than the cells of higher organisms.CharlesHBennett (talk) 12:17, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi User:CharlesHBennett. I think you left this on the wrong page. I did not undo that information, that was another user, who reverted back to my last edit there, which was just undoing simple vandalism. Electric Wombat (talk) 20:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry. I'll put the above on the Introduction to Viruses talk page, because I can't figure out who reverted my attempt to make the size description more exact.CharlesHBennett (talk) 12:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

The Special Barnstar
Thanks! Electric Wombat (talk) 18:27, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Rollback
Sorry about that, I must have hit it unintentionally.LM2000 (talk) 18:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

The pictures have information with them
didn't you notice? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minecraftracer16 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC) yes its confusing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minecraftracer16 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello Minecraftracer16, yes I did notice that, but saying what web site you pulled the file from is not the same as properly licensing the file. Meaning: just because you say where you got it, that still makes it a copyright violation - you're just confirming it by telling us where you got it. Except in a very few cases, you must own the picture you upload here, usually meaning you took it yourself. Just copying from a web site is not allowed if that site owns the copyright to it. I know it can be confusing at first (and it is), but see WP:COPYRIGHT for the full details. Electric Wombat (talk) 16:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

give me space
I just joined for gods sake, help me. I seem to do every dam thing wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minecraftracer16 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I understand you are new, and are trying to be a good editor, and I'm trying to help. Do these 2 things for the next month until you get the hang of how it works around here:
 * 1: Don't create any new articles. So far today, all of the ones have been duplicates of existing articles. Use the search box for articles that you like, and when it returns the results, make edits to sections in there. The Atom 3.5R, for example. As you said, there's no real info on the R in there, so edit a section for that, giving the same kind of information that's in the other sections of the article. I'll even create the sub-section so it will be in the right place.
 * 2: Don't add or upload any pictures, unless you yourself 100% no BS, took the picture yourself. Copyright law is a very complicated thing that many people here, even long term editors, don't fully understand. Because of this, its best to start out with only pictures from your camera or phone.


 * I see that you've got much enthusiasm for performance cars, and would love for you to improve the article here. Just do those 2 things above and you shouldn't run into any problems around policy. Electric Wombat (talk) 19:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Copy edit
Hello, greetings. Have rewritten Indian National Congress article completely but it became very lengthy. Need a copy edit. Will you please help me? Thank you.-- 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 15:35, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring
Sorry for edit-warring earlier today. I really feel bad about all this that happened and I promise I won't do it again. I've put Turtle Canyon up for deletion as per your comment on its talk page. Lumoshi (talk) 23:09, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem, especially since you stopped as soon as you saw the notice about it. If you want to officially request deletion of the page ("whatever" probably won't be a sufficient reason), you can put in place of what you have on there now. The page creator can request this, provided nobody else has made substantive adds to it. It will be up to the deleting admin to see if that condition has been met. If not, there are other methods, though they take a week or so to run to completion. Electric Wombat (talk) 23:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright, done. By the way, you seem pretty cool. Do you want to be friends? Lumoshi (talk) 23:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Quick Admin Help
Hello, the following edit summary needs a quick nuke:

Stupid meme that's only getting legs on the net...

Thanks! Electric Wombat (talk) 00:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * ✅, thanks. Stuff like this you can summon an admin for the way you did, but if you come across stuff that is more directed at a person, or involves personal information, you can also contact an admin willing to consider redaction requests by picking someone recently active from Category:Wikipedia_administrators_willing_to_handle_RevisionDelete_requests like myself, too.  And for *very* serious stuff, you can email WP:OVERSIGHT, those folks can remove stuff even from admin view.  Thanks again for keeping a watchful eye! --j⚛e deckertalk 04:10, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Alexia Umansky
Hello,

Please can you tell me what is wrong with the page Alexia Umansky. I have used every piece of information at my disposal and I think that Alexia is notable enough for a wikipedia page.

Emperor of Russia
I am a new line and am claiming the throne from a line dystany that starts with me. I don't believe that the Romanovs have the right to claim a throne so i moved to put my name in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DmitryVasily (talk • contribs) 23:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok so if i get a newspaper to cover my claim then it's good? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DmitryVasily (talk • contribs) 23:54, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Would an official Russian government report do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DmitryVasily (talk • contribs) 00:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Alice Kurashige article
Thanks so much! How do I access the OCR article? Is it the same one? I don't entirely understand; I'm not in California.--Aichik (talk) 01:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The OCR text is on the same page as the printed copy's image. Bottom half of the page, in the text box labeled "OCR Text". It's not well formatted, but has all the text from the page. Her part is about halfway down in the scroll box. Electric Wombat (talk) 21:48, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much!--Aichik (talk) 17:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks !
Thank you much for that barnstar !. It is much appreciated. 72.130.140.221 (talk) 03:58, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes I need help
my English skill are too poor!--Homo mundi (talk) 22:38, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Your edit to Silk Road (marketplace)
I do not understand your position that a link to the silk road marketplace violates wikipedia's policy. I've posted a question here and would appreciate your input on the matter.

Thanks.

Frazzydee|&#9997; 22:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Cube 4
Hello there can you please stop deteled my page please

Ernie Barbarash said he's will making new 4 film cube movie before is was his 3 movie Cube Zero (2004)" the poster cube 4 is not already yet..Ernie will shot this film from Canada in May 2015 and studio lion gate..

I am telling the truth
 * Hello. Please read that "Your First Article" link in the blue box on your talk page. The articles as you're making them are not ready yet. You need to read that link and make sure the article fits all that stuff. It may all be true, but you have to make sure it meets those requirements. Also see WP:AFC for a more step-by-step approach to creating an article. Electric Wombat (talk) 23:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Cube 4
Please it take more time lease don't deleted this!!! Please

Why you don't read this

Ernie Barbarash said he's will making new 4 film cube movie before is was his 3 movie Cube Zero (2004)" the poster cube 4 is not already yet..Ernie will shot this film from Canada in May 2015 and studio lion gate..
 * I did read this, and I replied here AND on your talk page. :-) Seriously, read that link in the blue box on your talk page, and follow those guidelines. Electric Wombat (talk) 23:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Dear Electric Wombat
Hello, I'm Electric Saba. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of the pictures on your page because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to put up pictures of real wombats, please do it in the wombat page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can go look for your friends. Thanks! Electric Saba. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.105.255.38 (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Admin Help
Hello, doing my usual patrolling and came across This Page, which appears to be 2 people, using the same account, having a conversation in Tagalog. Chunks are periodically deleted, so see the full history. I've not encountered this sort of thing, so am not sure how to handle it (tags, warnings, and so on), though I'm pretty sure this sort of thing is frowned upon. Please advise, thanks in advance! Electric Wombat (talk) 22:49, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reporting this. I have deleted the page per WP:CSD and blocked the user per WP:NOTHERE and as a shared acccount; but I will explain to them why, and a bit about what WP is really for. JohnCD (talk) 15:33, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

RE: CV
Sorry, no copyright violation was made. The article was taken from GlobalResearch, which states, "The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified."

Thanks for research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djphrost (talk • contribs) 23:08, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * No, you specifically cited New Statesman as your source for that section, which just as specifically claims copyright to it. Naming the source doesn't allow verbatim use of the content. To your point, yes Center for Research & Globalization grants permission to use "Original Global Research articles". The thing is, this one is not an original article from them. Look on the page on their own site. It specifically states there "It was first published on April 17, 2000 in the New Statesman." So again, it is sourced to New Statesman, which asserts copyright, and all sources you provide lead back there. If you really want that material in the article, then take that material and put it in your own words. You can use the article as a source for the ideas expressed, just put it in your own words. Electric Wombat (talk) 23:28, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Battle of the Shaer gas field
I would like to ask for your help on this issue. I am simply trying to stick to Wikipedia policy on neutrality, editing according to sources, and stopping edits based on online videos and Original Research. In the Reuters source, the military is reported to have recaptured the field (win for them), but the ISIS spokesman also claims they achieved their goal, which was to capture the 15 tanks. So, per the Reuters source, both sides claim achieving their goals. Per WP policy we should present both sides POV. Problem now here is user Potato1 is claiming ISIS did not capture the tanks based on liveleak videos and photos, where he COUNTED them. That in itself is a gross violation of WP policy on using online videos as sources and conducting Original Research. I tried to explain this to him, but he kept talking about the videos and photos and also saying the goal of the battle was to just simply capture the field, which is contrary to what the sources say and once again unsourced OR on his part. I tried explaining to him that per Wikipedia's policy its not up to us to decide who wins or who doesn't win based on our personal POV what's a victory (strictly prohibited OR). He ignored this. As for user Marcel Banisto, he says An encyclopedia does not show two opinions as outcome which is absolutely contrary to WP policy on editing from a neutral standpoint and per the sources. He also did not violate WP: Civility really, but was bordeline with his comments Stop this nonsense. Also, I would like to point out that it seems the account Marcel Banisto is a single-purpose account that has been only making edits (only 5) to this one article, and mostly reverting my edit. Also, he has made similar language as Potato1 of the goal of a battle being only capturing territory, so that raised some suspicion on my part of him being a sockpupet, but I can not be sure. In any case, I tried talking to both of them, pointing to WP: policy on this issue, but they refuse to talk and continue reverting me. What would you suggest? EkoGraf (talk) 09:32, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * - Reading the source given, I'm not sure "both sides claim victory" is supported. All the source says for sure is that the Syrians re-took the field, so I've modified the Outcome to say only that. The rest, about equipment destroyed/captured, etc., is better fleshed out in the article. In the context of the infobox, all that is germane is the re-taking of the field. ISIS says they didn't want to stay, that their goal was other, and so on, but to me that doesn't stand up as a claim of victory. I know this is probably not what you were hoping me to say, but as an impartial 3rd party, that's how I see it. Electric Wombat (talk) 15:52, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=620643686 your edit] to Springfield, Ohio may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:11, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * *[Adam Eaton (outfielder)] - Major league baseball player

Windiz articles (paul windiz, warren windiz, anthony windiz, scott windiz, eric windiz)
All of them should be deleted because they are all hoaxes, and does not get any relevant results on Google except wikipedia mirrors. 85.225.12.162 (talk) 17:04, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I do believe you are correct. All created within a day of each other, at first blush they're sourced, but the sources don't support them. Good eye! Electric Wombat (talk) 17:44, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Paul Windiz
Hello Electric Wombat. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Paul Windiz, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''not blatant enough for G3 IMO. Will list at AFD to be sure.''' Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 17:53, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok, but for the record, I did not nominate it, just restored the tag after removing it. Electric Wombat (talk) 18:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * And now I see you discovered the same thing I did (which caused me to restore the tag) and speedied all 3 of them. Thanks! Electric Wombat (talk) 18:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)