User talk:Crow/Archive 2

__NOINDEX__

DYK for Jimmy the raven
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:27, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Sandsledding
Sorry! I hope I'm not being really annoying... I'm new to wikipedia... I'm not trying to start an edit war. I was able to find a source for the fact that sandsledding is an actual thing that is different from sandboarding. I also want to put this image into the article http://www.nps.gov/grsa/planyourvisit/images/web285sandsledding_girl2012.jpg but don't know how... Also I think it actually might need to be listed as sand sledding with two words but I dont know how to change it. Thanks for any help!
 * Hello Ikamjh, I think you're better off at this point by editing the Sandboarding article and creating a section on Sledding. At some point, if the sledding section warrants it, it will be split off ("forked") into its own article, but only if it gets big enough and is notably different from 'boarding. The source you listed discusses both under the same topic, since the only difference is the board one rides upon, so we should probably do likewise.
 * As for the photo, since it is from NPS, a government agency, and the photo is credited to an NPS employee, it is considered Public Domain, so you can upload it here. Go to WP:UPLOAD for how to do that. Then when it's uploaded, you call it in the article like this: whateveryounamedthefile.jpg, to add it, thumbnail-size it, and put it on the right side of the page where single photos usually go. Let me know if you have any questions. Crow  Talk  22:07, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Mrdullins
Good morning. You sent a message that my new page appeared to be advertising. I am still in the process of building it out, but rest assured, it is not advertising we are seeking. We are one of a group of higher education schools, and our other campuses have Wikipedia entries, so my administration asked me to create one for our school as well. It will simply be our history, founding, etc. There will be no content related to current enrollment, etc. Hopefully this will be acceptable.

I am brand new to Wikipedia, so if there are any suggestions you have to make, I am certainly open to ideas or pointers. 22:07, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Thank you, Brian (mrdullins) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrdullins (talk • contribs) 16:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

"'Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia.'"
 * Hello Mrdullins and thanks for the reply and the explanation. The issue is that you've created this entry in your "userspace". Notice the title of the page is User:Mrdullins. That is a specific section of the wiki that all users get to use for things directly related to their on-wiki activities. Notice my page for example: User:Crow. Apart from a public-domain pic of a bird, the rest is things like articles I've created, pictures I've uploaded, etc. Regular articles (such as for your other campuses) are in what is called the "main space" or more appropriately, the "article space". There will be no prefix for the titles there. A good summary from the official policy is:
 * So what you have there now isn't really how it is supposed to be used. And more importantly right now (because of legal ramifications for Wikipedia), it is a copyright violation by having content directly copied from http://www.dallasinstitute.edu/. That will have to be cleared fairly quickly to avoid having your page deleted entirely. I understand you're new and so aren't aware of these nuances, but no harm done. The best thing would be to take 15 minutes and read THIS page on all the steps needed to create an article, including where to work on it until it is ready to "go live", how to collect and cite sources, and so on. And I'll be glad to try and help out as best I can. Thanks, and welcome! Crow  Talk  22:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the info. From what I was reading, I thought that one of the options for creating a page was to build it first in my user space and then copy it over. I'll work to resolve that issue asap.

Also, it is the administration of the college (who owns the website you referenced) that requested the page be built in the first place. So how do we go about clearing the copyright issue you pointed out?

I'll check out your links as well, but any "short answers" you can provide would be most appreciated. My comfort zone is the classroom, not building online web pages. :)

Thanks again. Mrdullins (talk) 19:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello again Mrdullins! (I link your name so it fires off that red flag up top, just so you know!) My apologies that I left out one preemptive answer to your question which is: Yes you can absolutely work on article drafts in your userspace. Its just preferred not to do so on the main page but rather a sub-page or sandbox page. Sandbox is easy: click the "sandbox" link up by your name to open that page and edit freely there. If you want to do a sub page (useful mainly if you have multiple articles in work), is to create a page called User:Mrdullins/WhateverNameYouWantHere. Again, sorry for leaving that not-quite-insignificant item out.
 * Copyright. The tricky thing about copyright is that Wikipedia content is freely usable by anyone else for pretty much any purpose, so we need all content to be similarly free. The easiest way to stay compliant there is to just paraphrase the copyrighted source in your own words. Conversely, if the owners of the copyright want to also release their content under a free license, then we have no violation anymore. Note that they would have to release it under This License, which would let anyone anywhere use it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as they credit where they got it from originally. If they do want to do that, see This Page for the procedure they would need to do to release that content. I hope this helps! Crow  Talk  22:21, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Request
I am opening a case for Arbitration. Can I add you as a party, so you will be able to comment.

Thanks, --Fevrret (talk) 23:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * User:Fevrret, Arbitration is not the right place for this. That's the last step in a long string of Dispute Resolution locations, and so a request will be declined as premature. The better venue for this is right where it is now. The admin that closes the discussion will review all comments, and should hopefully address the personal attack. If they don't, a note on that admin's talk page referencing it would be the first step. I would again reiterate to be careful when performing cleanup-type tasks though, as between the NAC and the moving of the other guy's comments, a raised eyebrow is understandable, though personal attacks of course are not. Crow  Talk  23:22, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Admin Help: Odd pattern on NPP
Hello admin! Not sure what to make of this, so I'm looking for feedback/advice. Over the last 2 days there's been an odd pattern popping up on New Page Patrol: A new account will pop up, add a 2-3 sentence blurb about Columbus GA to their talk page or user page, and make no further edits (1 exception follows). The blurbs don't come back as a copyright vio, and though they're a little promotional in tone, nothing really serious.

I cleared a few of the talk pages and replaced with a standard welcome message. One of the users reverted that and restored the Columbus blurb. It's slightly surreal! I don't know if this is a class project, a very low-level attempt at SEO for Columbus, or what. The pages in question are below (unlinked so as not to Ping): What do you make of this? Thanks for your time, Crow  Talk  00:10, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * User talk:ThachTheOriginal
 * User talk:Travisturman (User:Jamesmathis1 then edited the blurb to add another bit)
 * User talk:Alisiameyers
 * User:DamaraRemikie
 * User talk:Longino katelyn
 * User talk:Mccormickleigh1
 * User talk:Ellennnn7
 * Very interesting, but stupid :-). I suggest WP:CSD (WP:NOTWEBHOST). I've deleted them all and left a note - it's not easy for CSD when it's the talk page - User:DamaraRemikie was much easier (good idea not to wikilink these pages!). Feel free to add welcome templates. Ron h jones (Talk) 23:54, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

SCV
Thanks for the work you are doing at SCV. Regarding Shade (Living Colour album), the matching site is a known mirror. See:

Mirrors_and_forks/Pqr-- S Philbrick (Talk)  00:54, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

SCV Daikin Europe
You asked a question about the handling of Draft:Daikin Europe. I think G12 is an option but I will tell you why I didn't go that direction in this instance. In many cases, new editors are unaware that they cannot simply copy material from elsewhere. If they do so and CSB tags it, in some cases they simply abandon it. If that were the case G12 might make sense. In this case the editor remove the tag. Using AGF I assume that the editor either believes that the tag is invalid or believes they have addressed the issue. I think it is worth trying to have a conversation about that so as you can see I left a note with the editor.

My hope is that they will respond that the material it compares closely to is in fact a copy of some properly licensed source or Wikipedia or something else. That happens. Next best, they didn't appreciate the need for rewrite, but will do so when explained. If they do not respond or do not have an adequate response then I would move to removal or rewrite if that's feasible.

I generally do not do the blank option. Especially in the case of a draft which is already noindexed. In my view the blank option is for an editor who identifies a potential copyright issue but doesn't wish to do with it themselves or at least doesn't wish to deal with it at this moment and wants the material blanked until it can be addressed. If I'm planning on staying on top of that I'm not particularly worried that it might be visible for a few days.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  16:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes I sort of figured this was the case, so didn't G12 it either. I see you've contacted the author, and I have the page watchlisted already so will keep an eye open there. Crow  Caw  16:22, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

SCV
I'd like to make sure we are on the same page when it comes to SCV. I think I know what's happening but I don't want to be guilty of assuming and making a mistake. I see that you've been contributing quite a bit to SCV recently. That's extremely welcome; as you can see we don't have all that many people helping out.

I think you are assuming that because you are new, the best thing to do is review the item and add an explanation as text under the item. Then you expect that someone with more experience will come along and confirm your conclusion or correct it if you make in error. That's exactly the right sequence of events. In almost all cases your conclusions have been spot on. I think I found one instance early on when you missed something but when I pointed it out you realized it and have dealt with similar situations subsequently and gotten them right.

As you probably know chief copyright expert is moonriddengirl. If I have understood your approach to this task correctly and you are interested in continuing I'd like to ask her to take a look so we can decide when to transition from offering your opinion to simply handling them.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  15:54, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks Sphilbrick! Yes I would like to help out with copyrights: I've done NPP and RC Patrol, and while that's needed it also really just adds to the backlogs you guys have, which I can't really help with. Since discovering this page from one such NPP incident, I realize that I can help with the backlog here. (Ok, enough life story!) But yes you are correct: I thought I'd read that only Clerks and Admins should close investigations. Though that was on the main WP:CP page, which the SCV reports show up on, and where I first started checking them. One other factor was that I did want to see what my accuracy rate would be, to make sure I'm not way off-base in my interpretations, so your comments are further appreciated there!
 * So yes, long story short (too late?), I'd love to continue to help out in whatever capacity you need me, and that you trust me to do. Again, thanks for your kind words! Crow  Caw  16:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, MRG clarified something I did not know but makes sense. CP is a little different than SCV. I've worked at both, and agree. I've been at SCV more recently, because that's where I saw the biggest need. I hadn't realized that the position of clerk was solely for the CP area, so go ahead ans start closing the SCV items you work on. I do think it is helpful, in anything other than completely obvious closes, to include some rationale in the edit summary. You've been doing nice write ups, please continue, and either drop after the listing or in the edit summary. I usually do a one word summary if it is quite clear, but elaborate a bit when I think it is a closer call.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  18:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok will do! One question in that area, is it admin-only to remove a closed-out day from the main page, or am I ok to do that as well? (As you mentioned, I will still add explanatory writeups for less obvious ones). Crow  Caw  18:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

PROD declined
I procedurally declined your PROD at Requests for arbitration/Tachfin as PROD is not valid outside of article space. However, I have taken it to Miscellany for Deletion. The discussion is located here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Tachfin. Safiel (talk) 01:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah good to know, thanks! Crow  Caw  18:57, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Draft: Daniel Kanu
Hello, since this is my first article, and I wanted to post it as draft first to get all the valuable contibutions before I post it to articles, and you have removed very important parts of the article that are the facts about the person and told me not to re-add them, I would like to ask you if that means I can add those facts but in different form then before so they don't look exactly like the sentences removed? Thank you and Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ljiljana K (talk • contribs) 21:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes you can absolutely use the ideas, concepts, and facts from that source. As long as you put them in your own words, then everything is good. It is only when you copy someone else's words that we have to remove that text. Crow  Caw  23:00, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Filipino organized crime
While eligible for speedy deletion, I declined it in light of including this in a series of articles on organized crime. Bearian (talk) 21:35, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

You do realize that large chunks of that may be fictitious, yes? Long-term abuse/Malusia22  Crow  Caw  21:41, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

SCV
Hi! I just wanted to say what a great job you seem to be doing at WP:SCV, it's a pity there aren't ten of you. I've noticed some of the questions you've asked there, but haven't really felt qualified to try to answer them – I see that has, though. As you've probably noticed, I've sometimes looked at what you've done, mostly agreed with it, and occasionally followed up on it a bit.

I'm not too sure what should be done about Matt Bish, listed in Suspected copyright violations/2014-09-07 (I'd like to close that day up); you've done a lot of good cleaning up, but I feel that we still have a foundational copyvio that hasn't been fully removed. I may be completely wrong here, but I was wondering if you'd like either to ping Sphilbrick or MRG or someone for their view, or instead just go ahead and list it at WP:CP where others will surely see it, and where there's a good chance it'll get completely rewritten? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:25, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments! Re Matt Bish, I'd say that right now a good 90% of the duplicate detector's hits are long school names (The school of audio engineering and film, the school of architecture at makerere university, and so on), and the names of sources in the references section. I can take another pass at it to prune out some of the remaining DD hits ("father's JVC video deck" to "father's VCR", etc). I'll retract my closing of that and ping for opinions though.  Crow  Caw  23:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I will try to take a look tomorrow.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  00:43, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * MRG just beat it into copyright submission! Crow  Caw  00:45, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yahoo, procrastination to the rescue.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  00:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Deletions of My Edits
Hi. I have been editing the Drinker, Biddle & Reath Wikipedia entry over the past two years by inserting three court decisions of national importance in which Drinker Biddle & Reath's Insurance Department was involved. One of the cases was the topic of a front page article in the Wall Street Journal in 2010. The cases are very similar as they involve the same legal issue and were litigated in California and New York. Shortly after I make my edits, the entries are deleted. I don't know who is making the deletions. Today, I saw a message on Wikipedia to me that I should stop making the edits. Is this message coming from Wikipedia? I am an insurance lawyer and my edits are entirely accurate and extremely relevant. The court cases are referred to as the Kramer, Teren and Fishman decisions. What am I doing wrong? Thanks for your input. Lockpen (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello, that notice on your talk page was apparently left by someone affiliated with DBR, given the user name. They left this message a few weeks ago (clicking the History link on your page will show every edit, and who left it). The additions I undid today were due to them not having a source listed. Because they mentioned specific people by name, and it could be seen as negative, our policy on edits regarding living people requires they be sourced. If you can provide a source for those, such as WSJ or well known publications (and preferably not solely a Lexis link as the average reader will not have access, though a Lexis citation is appropriate for completeness), then those additions should be fine. Crow  Caw  21:48, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

EZSource
Hi, Crow. As the only other contributor to the article's talk page, your input would be welcome at Articles for deletion/EZSource. Psychonaut (talk) 21:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

 * That's a richly deserved star! Nice going, ! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:55, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you both! Crow  Caw  20:57, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Vandalism123456


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User talk:Vandalism123456, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gparyani (talk) 02:36, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * NOTE for anyone who may see this, that page was page-move vandalism that I reverted, so as far as the automated tools knew, I made the first edit to the above page so it sent me the warning. Click the actual link to see the proper history, and my CSD log to show me nominating the main page for CSD. Just saying... Crow  Caw  22:06, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Missed your ping
Hi! I missed your ping on Suspected copyright violations/2014-09-17, don't know why. There are some templates you can use for PD attribution in an article, either Source-attribution or CC-notice; probably the latter would have been the better choice for that page if the hand-written notice hadn't already been there. Also, I think you may not be aware of Translated page, which is probably easier to use than Copied for attribution of interwiki translations (it goes on the talk page, like Copied). I'm not aware of any obligation to acknowledge translations in the source wiki, but I suppose a note of thanks on the talk page is unlikely to give offence. Many thanks for all the work you are doing, it's really making a difference. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 01:18, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Admin Impersonation
Hello, question: Is placing Category:Wikipedia administrators on one's user page, when not actually an admin, considered impersonation? If not, does it fall under the "rare exceptions" to editing that user's User Page to remove such? (Not a hypothetical, as you may have guessed.) Crow  Caw  22:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Remove it. Aside from anything else, it's an inaccurate use of the category. It's also confusing to other users, and hence mildly disruptive. Definitely a case where editing someone else's userpage would be permitted. Yunshui 雲 水 08:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

You removed my link
Hi crow. You removed my external link i left on user PUA-bcn's talk page. It was an invite for PUA-bcn to come join my wiki site since I noticed that that user likes to work on articles related to the seduction community. I'm not sure if you, Crow, are PUA-bcn. If you are then I didn't mean to mess up your talk page on the PUA-bcn user page. If you do enjoy writting article about the seduction community check out my site wiki at www.puapedia.com. If not you go ahead and remove this post. thank you.

Puapedia (talk) 04:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Boris Bakal
Dear Crow, I am not the native speaker in English and I really appreciate when someone helps me to do this page. But, I am the author of the text on linkedin page and I also made this page. So how to make this working? I also changed a lot of this bio text and even then you removed my post. Can you explain me why? DrudipepoDruidpepo (talk) 13:00, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello . Yes this happens a lot, and people don't understand why, which is ok. The problem is that we have no way of knowing who wrote the LinkedIn page, or if you are the same person. I'm not suggesting that you are doing anything wrong, but just that we don't know for 100%. With copyright, we have to be sure. If you email permissions-en@wikimedia.org they can verify all the facts and tell you how to release your content on LinkedIn so it can be used here. They do all that verifying through email to protect your privacy, which is why we would not do that on a page like this one. I hope this helps. Feel free to ask me any questions here. Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  16:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

More thanks
I see more and yet more whole vast swathes of SCV listings very competently dealt with, so came to offer some more thanks. What you are doing is really making a difference. You left a sort of question about wikimapia. I don't know the answer, but my take is this: it's a wiki, so not WP:RS, and we don't have any guarantee (as we've seen) that the content licenced as free is in fact free; so my inclination is not to attribute it, but simply to remove any content copied from it. Anyway, that's what I did at Sharif Jalalpur; I think the attribution there may be unnecessary, but I don't know. Anyway, thanks again, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks . I think I've had copyright blinders on lately: between the above RS issue and the declared paid editing in that other article, I think I need to look at the big picture more, especially if the SCV backlog is taken out. I appreciate the feedback! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  18:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

John Hartnell
Part of the article is copied from the findagrave site, but most part of article is not copied from the findagrave site. So, the article should not be deleted --Mirno talk 20:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, the article will not be deleted because of that, but the copied material must be removed. For legal reasons, we cannot take content copied directly from other sources, unless those sources release that content under a compatible free license, which findagrave does not. Feel free to write that section in your own words; you can use the findagrave site for general concepts and ideas, but the words used must be your own. Thanks for your contributions, Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  20:21, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, now I know what to do. That part of the article I will write in your own words.--Mirno talk 20:24, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=628361696 your edit] to Holly Fields may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:15, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * booked the CBS pilot for CBS Summer Playhouse: Fort Figueroa (1988) and starred with [Charles Haid].

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=629776358 your edit] to Jackson Records may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * labels/ imprints are owned and administered by Jackson Records Media &amp; Strategics, India formerly known as Digisys Media Network until July 2014. Jackson Records as a label started

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=631230048 your edit] to John Hartnell may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * web |url=http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&amp;GRid=7841255|title=John Hartnell 1820-1846 Find A Grave}}

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Rubber room (bunker) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 21:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for responding to my copyright issues. I am not sure how to communicate with you directly regarding my questions on it. (thanks for your patience, as well). The artist I am working with is extremely tech/internet deficient and trying to explain the issue and posting the free license option was a nightmare. Anyway, I am looking more in to it and the explanation you so generously offered me and will probably be back with more questions soon. Thank you!!! Tammydunst (talk) 19:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
Many thanks TomStar! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw 22:11, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Rubber room (bunker)
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  00:03, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Me, again
Thanks again for your reply. We were about to move forward with option 1 that you suggested for the copyright and it turns out that the page was deleted. This is so frustrating and seems stupid for someone (me) that has no idea what they are doing to even attempt. I don't know the artist personally but agreed to help her create this page. I don't know what else to do. Are there people that can be hired to construct legitimate wiki pages?Tammydunst (talk) 06:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Yukio Utada
Thanks for clearing that up, I was in the middle of declining it, but got called away (should have marked it as under review). Rankersbo (talk) 23:28, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * No worries! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  23:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

SCV
Hi! I notice your name all over the suspected copyright infringements page, that's some solid work. I've just started dipping my toes in the water with entries from the 7th. Please feel free to let me know if I mucked anything up! Cheers, Basie (talk) 14:07, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, we need all the help we can get! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  19:30, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * That is indeed the truth! Another pair of hands ( ... or eyes?) would make a huge difference, . Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

CCI request
Hi! I've just seen your CCI request, which I'm about to go and add my 2c to, as I've also been having dealings with the same editor in relation to MP Anil Kumar. But ... is it possible that you might have forgotten to put a  on his talk page? I looked through the history and didn't immediately see it. Anyway, I've left him one just in case. Many, many thanks for all your good work. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I thought I had and he just blanked it like the rest of my notices, but looking at the history it seems I did not. Thanks for posting that! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  23:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Delete/recreate
Hi again. Under what circumstances does an article need to be deleted and recreated to remove offending material from the history? Cheers, Basie (talk) 23:52, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * It actually doesn't need deleting, just a Revision Delete (revdel) of the offending versions. You can get the revision number (if you didn't already know) by clicking the Date Stamp in the history next to the first and last versions that contain the material. The url for those pages will end with "oldid=some number". That number is the version of the page. You then plug those into Template:Copyvio-revdel, using the syntax given there, and put it at the top of the current rev of the page. Thanks for the help again! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  00:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Hopefully I've got it right at Los Angeles Virtuosi Orchestra. Cheers, Basie (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * That looks right, yes! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  01:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Coren's bot
They're all not only correctly licensed but templated as such, and it's deeply annoying to see editors adding good content repeatedly getting these incorrect messages. He needs to whitelist articles that are CC-by-SA templated. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 01:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't think it's unreasonable to remove the archiving parameter until such time as he checks his talk page. Someone who runs an extremely active bot and is regularly away for weeks or months at a time sure as hell should not have his talk page being archived on a weekly or fortnightly basis. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 01:42, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * As the bot's tag says, if it is truly a false positive, then (unlike many other tags here) it is perfectly fine to remove the notice. Believe me I understand the frustration, but the bot's sole function is to flag Possible violations, which it does very well 99%+ of the time. It can whitelist based on web sites (domain names down to page links), so if you have one source that is constantly getting flagged, then by all means report it. The unseen problem with CC sources is that they get mirrored all over the place, so it is hard to confirm the license. That's why (again) the bot flags a possible violation and leaves it to a human to make the determination.
 * On the archive bot, I think the better course is to email him using the sidebar link. Or failing that, watch his contributions to see when he returns and ping him then. Perhaps even a ping on your own talk page so he will see the alert, and you can leave that there as long as you wish. Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  01:48, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Addendum: Wow... Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  01:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Please help me!
Honestly, Im new here. I just created an article about myself, I didnt know about the references and all...will u help me? because I want to maintain my article and not be marked for deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dominic James O26 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi! Thanks for wanting to contribute. Unfortunately, as you've seen, your article got deleted for notability reasons. See WP:N which will tell you what "notability" means here (it is not meant to be an insulting term), and WP:GNG for a guideline to know the kind of sources and references needed to prove "notability". Basically, you need to have gotten a large amount of press that you yourself did not write (so no Facebook, press releases, that kind of thing). The best way to proceed it to click that "Visit the Teahouse" link on your talk page, where there are numerous folks to help you with getting an article started. Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  17:02, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Black Mirror
Thanks for the slight undo you did to the page I created White Christmas due to the copy violation. I just copied the information from the main Black Mirror page as it wasn't really relevant to that page, but I didn't notice that the whole thing was a long quote, so thanks for spotting and removing it, I will try to be more careful in future. MisterMeph (talk) 22:59, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * No worries. If you intersperse parts of the quote along with your own text, as appears in the other paragraph, then there's no problem. It's just that the quote can't provide the only content. Thanks for the article! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  23:03, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yakov Modestovich Gakkel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Yay!
is good news indeed, I'm very pleased to see it! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks to you and for your confidence!  Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  23:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 02:07, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost
This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Articles for creation

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Articles for creation for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (vent)  @ 20:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ernest Cashel
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thanks for the clarification on ICANNwiki.

Jgreene1333 (talk) 13:52, 5 February 2015 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>

Care to comment on E-Government?
Crow, I have started a discussion on the E-Government talk page. I'm not sure if this is a topic you are interested in, but seeing as you're one of the most recent editors in a while I figured I'd see if you had any comment on it. Thanks, &#160;<span style="background:#fff;padding:0px 6px;font-family:Garamond;font-weight:bold;letter-spacing:5px;border:1px dotted black"> Discant X  21:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 8 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Draft:Gunnar Malmin page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=650495851 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F650495851%7CDraft:Gunnar Malmin%5D%5D Ask for help])

MCQ post
Just a quick constructive comment about one of your posts. Your statement that if the author is not willing to do so, then the image can only be used here under Fair Use ... is not entirely correct. We do not accept fair use as an alternative but apply a much stricter non-free criteria, and if an image is not released freely it cannot just be claimed as fair use. It must comply with all 10 non-free content policy guidelines which is not exactly what you told the poster. It is best to be very specific about the rules especially as many editors questioning on WP:MCQ are newbies or not familiar with copyright. Good luck ww2censor (talk) 23:42, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually U|Ww2censor, that is precisely what I said to the OP: If the author is not willing to do so, then the image can only be used here under Fair Use, assuming no free equivalent version exists or can reasonably be created, and the other criteria are met. I even linked to the NFCC page for their easy perusal of the required criteria! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  23:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * To me your phraseology imples that fair use could be an alternate, which is of course not the case, but the impression for newbies reading it could IMHO that fair use can be claimed if they can't find a free image. Beside that I always feel one must clearly make the distintion, especially when a poster mentions it, that we do not allow fair-use but use a much stricter criteria based on the NFCC policy. To me it was just matter of perception. That's all. Thanks for your good work. ww2censor (talk) 15:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Point taken. Perception is reality after all. I suppose I should have put the conditional at the start so as not to garden-path the OP: "The image can be used as fair use... OK then, that's what I'll do!" I appreciate the feedback! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  21:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks ww2censor (talk) 23:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright Issues
PLEASE HELP ME RESOLVE COPYRIGHT ISSUES!!!

I hereby affirm that I, StudioM NYC, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of minakoyoshino.com. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Minako Yoshino Content Creator and Copyright Owner of StudioM NYC and of minakoyoshino.com content. Wednesday, March 18, 2015

24.168.72.32 (talk) 00:58, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Crow. I got the same message on my talk page. I assume it's from the article's creator editing while logged out. On the off-chance, I've posted some advice for him/her at User talk:Milkyway2012. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 09:55, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Mrdullins returns
I've finally had a chance to re-work the page you and I discussed back in September 2014. (That discussion is in your Archive 2, but I couldn't figure out how to add to that string so I started a new conversation here.)

Your original concerns related to copyright issues and the possibility that the website I had created about our school might be seen as a sales nature. I have removed comments related to our course offerings, how to contact the school (except for a link to our website), etc. to try to avoid the sales "feel." And the content itself has been totally re-written and quotes cited where they occur so we can avoid the copyright questions.

Before I submit for review, however, I'd like to add links to the appropriate categories as I have seen done in other articles, but I'm not certain how to LOCATE those categories in the first place. I know that seems very elementary, but when I search for what might be a category name, I get specific articles instead. Is there any way to see which categories exist out there without merely browsing through the category list?

Thanks so much. Mrdullins (talk) 18:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Mrdullins


 * Hi, and good to see you back! I'm glad you weren't put off by some of the quirks in policy here. I've looked over the new version and I think you're ok from a copyright perspective, and mostly ok from a promotional perspective. There are still 1 or 2 small bits, but nothing that should be problematic (see my edit to the lead section for the kind of thing I mean). It is not exclusively promotional, which is the red flag for that. I like the history section as well.
 * As far as Categories go, those don't get applied until the draft is accepted and promoted. This is just so a draft doesn't show up in the live category list which could draw readers to an incomplete article. Finding the right category though, to your question, is an art unto itself. One way is to start typing in the search field in the upper-right of the page, stating with "Category:". As you type, categories that match will appear in the list. For example, if you start typing Category: Private schools in D, you'll see that Category:Private Schools in Dallas Texas appears as one of the options, and would be a likely one to use here. Another method to identify appropriate categories is to find an existing article about a similar institution and see what categories it uses.
 * I hope this helps. Feel free to leave me a note if I can be of further assistance. Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  22:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

YGM
You've got mail. -- Diannaa (talk) 01:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * You do too! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  22:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks and apologies
Hi, ! I wanted to thank you for all you've been doing to keep the fragile vessel Copyright afloat - time and again I look at a day at SCV and find it all done and dealt with thanks to you. I hope that others sometimes mention to you how valuable your help is; I know it's been ages since I did. So it makes me particularly uncomfortable when I step on your toes, as I've just (carelessly and inadvertently) done at Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Arts, where I failed to notice your name in the history until I went to do the copyvio-revdel request; I'm truly sorry, I should of course (a) have seen that you had edited there and (b) therefore asked your opinion before doing anything else. If you think that I have made any sort of a wrong call there, please let me know, or just go ahead and put it right. Right, now I'm going to go and see if that day can be crossed off yet ... Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * No apology needed! As it happened in this particular case, I was abruptly called away while working that article. I had removed the obvious one that the bot caught, and the rest seemed far too similar in style to the school's page, but I had to go before investigating further (exacerbated by Earwig's bot not getting along with Yahoo Boss, so a huntdown of the rest of that article would have been manual). You basically did what I probably would have ended up doing had time permitted. And thanks for the kind words as well! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  22:16, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Deleting Doctors Worldwide article
Hi, I hope you are well, I would like to know the factors that will prevent deleting Doctors Worldwide, because it is an International non-governmental organization registered in UK and in Turkey, and we are working in 30 countries around the world,& this is our English website http://www.doctorsworldwide.org/ & our Turkish website https://www.yyd.org.tr/tr of course I would like to see my INGO in the Wikipedia if it has the indication of notability, Best.--Drmustaffa (talk) 12:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello ! I didn't see that article but it appears to have been deleted because it did not show why it was "notable". On Wikipedia, "notable" means: Have other people, not related to that INGO, written about it or discussed it in detail, such as in news, magazines, journals, books, television, radio, interviews, etc. If they have, then it should be easy to find links to those discussions, and add them into the article. The pages here which discuss those requirements in detail are: WP:GNG for the things that have to be in an article for it to be considered "notable", and WP:RS for the kinds of sources that we do and don't consider valid for showing notability. I hope this helps, and please feel free to ask me any questions about anything (but put them at the bottom of my page, not at the top). Thanks! Crow <sup style="color:black;"> Caw  21:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC)