User talk:CrowdsofCrowds

Conflict of interest policy
Hello, CrowdsofCrowds. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 21:36, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 17:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

In case you missed it, I wrote, " coi, undue, promotional - likely due brief mention towards end of article, in larger context than just one researcher's perspective". Clearly you have a conflict of interest with the material, so you should take great care before adding it all. If someone disagrees with the content, as has happened multiple times now, please discuss it on the article talk page.

Given the studies all share an author, there's little or no broad context here. Further, such a section does not belong at the beginning of the article, rather at the end.

The article could use the help of someone with your expertise, but you have to realize as an encyclopedia our articles should have little emphasis on the most recent research, and even less on recent theories. --Ronz (talk) 17:19, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Images
I assumed you have a conflict of interest because of the images you uploaded. Please explain where the images you've uploaded came from and what permission you obtained to use them, so we can put the conflict of interest concerns behind us. --Ronz (talk) 22:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Edit-warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 22:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.