User talk:Crowman68

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Sally Pryce has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Steven Zhang The clock is ticking....  07:14, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * User Crowman68, the sole author, blanked the page. This is commonly interpreted as a request for deletion as per db-g7.  — Athaenara  ✉  07:54, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Article proposed for deletion
Dear Crowman68 - the article you created Sally Pryce has been proposed for deletion on the basis that it does not establish its notability, has no citations, and appears to be self-promotion or spam. If this is a genuine article, don't despair - you can engage in the discussion on the article's talk page, and improve the article by citing secondary sources not related to the subject of the article (ie. press coverage or independent film, television or literary coverage). Thank you for your engagement with Wikipedia and please continue working on this and other articles. - DustFormsWords (talk) 07:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi! I noticed you attempted to remove the speedy deletion template.  That's not an appropriate way to resolve this problem - if you intend to continue improving the article, consider using the "hangon" template to let us know you've got further work to do.  Or alternatively, move the article to your user page and put it back out in the open when it's ready for us to see. - DustFormsWords (talk) 07:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)