User talk:CrowzRSA/Archive 3

File:Left Behind Video.jpg
Hi, I nominated the file for deletion. Regards Hekerui (talk) 12:21, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joey Jordison
The article Joey Jordison you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Joey Jordison for things which need to be addressed.  C  anniba loki  16:49, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Freak on a Leash
The article Freak on a Leash you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Freak on a Leash for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment.  C  anniba loki  22:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of War at the Warfield
The article War at the Warfield you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:War at the Warfield for things which need to be addressed.  C  anniba loki  01:52, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Blues for the Red Sun
Thanks for the extra time. I've made a few adjustments to the article. RG (talk) 06:18, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for passing the article. RG (talk) 17:52, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eternal Pyre
The article Eternal Pyre you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Eternal Pyre for things which need to be addressed.  C  anniba loki  13:36, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Raining Blood
The article Raining Blood you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Raining Blood for things which need to be addressed.  C  anniba loki  15:11, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seasons in the Abyss
The article Seasons in the Abyss you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Seasons in the Abyss for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment.  C  anniba loki  21:11, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joey Jordison
The article Joey Jordison you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Joey Jordison for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment.  C  anniba loki  15:08, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Infobox
Hey man, just wondering why you completely changed the infobox on Slipknot (band) back to what it was like before I rewrote the article. I cleaned it up by removing the links to List of Slipknot band members on the past members who do not have their own articles because that is not proper linking and that article is linked to in the Band members section. I also changed the main image in the infobox because I believe that the other image is more striking and represents the band better. We don't have many great free images with several band members in, so I guess it's just personal preference on that one, unless we can come to a consensus. Anyway, I thought I'd explain myself and make you aware of what I did and ask why you decided to change it? While I'm here, you might like to know that I have now nominated the article for FA status after completely rewriting it so I'd appreciate your help with ensuring any comments made on that are met. -- REZTER  TALK   &oslash;  23:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * That's cool, I just copied an infobox from an oldid without checking it because I figured someone randomly changed the picture (they do that a lot). I got the page peer reviewed a while ago, but never really got to fixing it since I was working on getting Slayer to a GT/FT and getting Korn to GA. I won't be back on wiki until Friday so hopefully the page will still be up for nomination by then. Crowz  RSA  23:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for The Vinyl Conflict
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:03, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vermilion Pt 2 single.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Vermilion Pt 2 single.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Bleach
Apologies for the delay Crowz, will try to look at this again later today. --FormerIP (talk) 12:03, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

I've done some work in that article while you're away, for the GA review... and apparently FormerIP is waiting for you to return. Can you at least warn him? igordebraga ≠ 23:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

That sentence about Kmart promoting the album which you added needs some clarification. Google Books doesn't have that biography, so can you expand? igordebraga ≠ 21:08, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Note
The article Gaius Meng, which you created back in August 2009, has been listed as a potential hoax. Care to clear things up? DS (talk) 21:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Korn - Here to Stay.ogg
 Thanks for uploading File:Korn - Here to Stay.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  02:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of L.A.P.D. (band)
The article L.A.P.D. (band) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:L.A.P.D. (band) for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Aaron north (talk) 01:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Korn card.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Korn card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:43, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Billion Dollar Babies
Hello, CrowzRSA. I've made the corrections you requested for the article. RG (talk) 23:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Adagio for Strings
The article Adagio for Strings you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Adagio for Strings for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:36, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

GA nomination for "Freak on a Leash"
I would recommend you withdraw this nomination, as it appears that you have not addressed any of the reviewer's concerns from the previous nomination (and it was a pretty substantial list). Remember, Good Article nominations are not supposed to take the place of peer reviews. They should only be initiated when an article is of good quality. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk &bull; contributions) 19:28, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, I believe I have, because I fixed and removed all the maintenance tags that Cannibaloki put on the page. Crowz  RSA  23:32, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Nothing from the "Comments" section of the review appears to be addressed. I'm looking at individual comments/issues that user raised and they are still apparent in the article. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk &bull; contributions) 00:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, I considered all the comments, but didn't act upon a couple. Crowz  RSA  00:37, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PsychopathyRed.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:PsychopathyRed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

OSI (band)
Thanks for taking the time to review this article! Apologies for the delay in addressing the points you've brought up in the review - I think they're all taken care of, now. Let me know if there's anything left which needs doing! Una LagunaTalk 16:41, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

All in the Family (song)
Hi CrowzRSA. I verified all the sources you've tagged in this article – I looked them all up on October 24, including the Rolling Stone article. Would you mind removing the tags? Thanks a lot, Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 22:07, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Slow Dance GAR
I'm a bit (acutally WAY) busy outside of Wikipedia so could I get an extension on the time limit for the Slow Dance review? Candy o32  00:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I usually wait about 1-2 months actually before I fail articles. I'll help you out by fixing some stuff. Crowz  RSA  01:18, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe all concerns have been addressed now. Candy  o32  16:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi/Proposition
Hi there Crowz. So I'm sure you noticed the GA backlog is really long, so I've come up with a deal I have already done with other editors to make our articles get reviewed. I would trade reviews with you, so you'll review something for me and I for you. Here's what I'd like. You currently have many articles needing reviews. So my propostion is I would review 4 for you (Your albums aren't that long), and you would review Daydream and Number 1's for me. You'll get 4 because mine are quite longer than yours. Does that sound fair? Are you up to it? Thanks :).-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   04:20, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * That's not a bad idea, I think that'd be fine. But if you can, can you actually give my nominees a chance?? Because I've had a user that quick-failed like four of my nominations for no reason... Anyways I guess I'll start reviewing (it may take me a week or two though). Crowz  RSA  23:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey there. Sure I'm patient and fair. Let me guess, was is (CK) Lakeshade? lol he did that to me as well. Which four do you want me to review? You haven't told me which ones. I'll be fair and impartial don't worry, your work looks good and passable. So just let me know which four you want me to do :)-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   00:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, if you review songs as well, I really need "Raining Blood" to be reviewed... But if not here are my top 5 anyway...


 * 1) "Raining Blood"
 * 2) Eternal Pyre
 * 3) ''War at the Warfield
 * 4) Seasons in the Abyss
 * 5) Divine Intervention (album)
 * Thanks, Crowz  RSA  00:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Its fine don't worry, they are fairly short. I'll do them all.-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   01:11, 5 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I'll take a look tomorrow. In the mean time, I'll probably also have the last two done as well. You almost done? :)-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   09:12, 14 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah I'm pretty much done with both of them, I just haven't written 'em up yet... Crowz  RSA  16:16, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

I just passed "Raining Blood", Eternal Pyre and War at the Warfield. The last two will be ready for you tonight. Let me know when your done reviewing mine so I can take a look. Thanks.-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   20:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Can you review?
Can you please review Jessica Simpson discography? I have listed it for a peer review. I really need suggestions to make it neat. Thank You No vice 7   (Talk)  04:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I would like to give you some advice Novice. The formula is a bit weird. The release dates should be in the same box as the title, and it should not be in bold. Look at the Mariah Carey albums discography and the Mariah Carey singles discography which recently became FL for guidance. As for your GA nominations, I suggest you work on them some more. As an example, I'll use Just Whitney.... The lead is very underdeveloped. You should have 3 full and developed paragraphs that cover all the important parts of the article. Again, look at Music Box and Butterfly which are both recent GAs to guide you. You should easily double the lead in info and size, I mean all you mention are 2 facts and its sales. The "Development", "Recording" and "Music and lyrics" sections are way too short, under developed and uninformative. There is allot more to write about. The others look okay at first glance. Next,most of the "Promotion" section is unsourced. Things like this would cause be to quick-fail, because it needs allot of work. I tell you this to help you out, and only with good intentions. Good luck!-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   05:06, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I am almost done. Just some doubts. I saw that Taylor Swift's discography and Kesha's discography both have a different format (like mine). Is it okay to continue with the existing style? Also, should promotional singles should really be merged? Last, is there a need to cite a compilation (like Disneymania), when Wikipedia has a page on it? These are just my doubts. I hope you're not offended. :) No vice 7   (Talk)  08:13, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Please check it. I have made some changes. No vice 7   (Talk)  05:20, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Shall I close the peer review? Please leave your comments on my talk page. No vice 7   (Talk)  12:28, 7 November 2010

(UTC) Thank You! But, what about the style? I saw a discussion going on. That's why I'm waiting to nominate the article. Candyo32's nomination of Fantasia's discography is on the waiting list. No vice 7  (Talk)  16:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, honestly, I think Candy's gonna have to change it to be an FL, because it somewhat does go against WikiProject Discographies/style. But changes shouldn't be hard... Do you think I should change it??? Crowz  RSA  16:24, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It would be helpful if you could help me. I hope the lead is now ok. The reason why I hesitate to nominate it is that I've not included much about International charts (Aus, UK etc). Should that be included too? No vice 7   (Talk)  16:33, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Or, I will do it. I made the page like this. So, I will change it myself. Thanks for asking though. About the lead, please do reply. No vice 7   (Talk)  16:46, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, that's fine. I think that the promotional singles and singlesnal singles and singles should be merged, because they're already more or less the same thing, and I suppose if another article verifies something (unless something big, like it charted somewhere, but if it was small like it's a compilation, it's fine). Crowz  RSA  17:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a studio album. So, that must be included. Right? No vice 7   (Talk)  03:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

I've closed the review. Thanks for your help. No vice 7  (Talk)  12:32, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

"challenge"
Re: This edit summary. Adding the tag is challenging the verifiability of the information.&mdash;Kww(talk) 03:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:God Lives Underwater
Portal:God Lives Underwater, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:God Lives Underwater and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:God Lives Underwater during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Zetawoof (&zeta;) 16:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Ramones
Hey, good work expanding the Ramones' debut album article. I noticed your comment on the talk page about wanting to nominate it for FA; once you are done with the expansion, feel free to hit me up for a copy-edit/peer-review. I'll do my best to bring it up to FA standard.—indopug (talk) 08:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * That would be great, I just got a peer review, but since then I added "Promotion" section and expanded the lead. But a copy-edit would be great because I often make careless mistakes and stuff in my writing. Crowz  RSA  02:37, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

GAs
You almost done Crowz? Cmon lets get this show on the road :)-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   03:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, they're both on hold now. Crowz  RSA  03:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I'll get to them now. I did your last one, but I didn't finish because you should really go through it again. I didn't fail you, but it needs significant re-writing as I have left some comments. This one doesn't measure up to the last 4 for some reason. Let me know after you've worked on it.-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   04:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * All done, please check back :)-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   05:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey, so I passed the last 2. Good job! :)-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   20:43, 26 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Sure! I'm open to it as well. I don't have any articles that aren't being reviewed at the moment, but I will in a few days :) I'll llet you know!-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   23:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Discussion
Hey :), please help reach consensus and vote here.-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   05:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi
At minimum this article (Talk:Tell 'Em/GA1) needs to be failed, after that it should be nominated for delete as it clearly fails WP:NSONG. - (CK)Lakeshade  -  talk2me  - 21:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Hello Crowz, I see you have nominated the Eazy-E discography for FL. There are some additions - "Real Muthaphuckkin G's" charted in Hot R&B songs chart at number thirty-one Source. Try adding Billboard as a common source to the US R&B charts. Also, the prose needs some fix — like mentioning the year of release, formatting etc. I've mentioned them in the FLC page. No vice 7 Talk  10:51, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

For the record...
...this copy edit at the Eazy-E article was not "improper," as you stated. It, for example, fixed the egregious "there" in "In 1988, they released there most controversial album...", replaced several redundant words and fixed several sentence fragments (all of which remain intact, even though you claimed to revert them.) If anything was "improper", it was the writing, tone and formatting in the lead. Please watch where you throw such terms around. Colinclarksmith (talk) 19:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bill Murto
Hello, I have contested the prod you placed on Bill Murto and redirected the page to Compaq on the grounds that it is a plausible search term. If you disagree, feel free to list it at RfD or at AfD if the redirect is reverted. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 18:06, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Grammy Award for Best Hard Rock/Metal Performance
Looking forward to your GA review. Thanks! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much! Your assistance is much appreciated. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:27, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello Crowz.. Can you do me a favor?
Hello there! Can you do me a favor and peer review Hilary Duff's So Yesterday? Your review of Jessica Simpson discography was great and it became a FL! Thanks... No vice 7 Talk  12:20, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey Crowz, are there any more comments? And, how's your Eazy-E discography going? I haven't checked it in a while..:) No vice 7  Talk  17:08, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I just finished the Peer Review. The Eazy discography is goind okay for the record, two supports and one oppose. Crowz  RSA  19:31, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Done fixing too. I will be closing it soon. Thanks.. No vice 7  Talk  14:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Flower Drum Song
Hi. I attended to your last two comments. Can you support yet, or are you still reviewing? All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:09, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Peer Review.
Hey there, I have opened Christina Aguilera for a Peer Review. Please leave your comments and suggestions here. Thanks so much! ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT (talk · contribs) 03:06, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Template:Infobox album
You may want to comment here. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Discussion
Hello. Please leave your comments here. No vice 7 Talk  12:28, 7 December 2010 (UTC)