User talk:Croxx036

Welcome!
Hello, Croxx036, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! smileguy91 Need to talk? 13:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Previous accounts
Its obvious that this isn't your first account. Please can you advise details of your previous accounts - email is fine or you can declare your prevhius accounts to the arbitration committee. Thanks. Spartaz Humbug! 17:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * please can you answer this question. It's obvious this is not a new user. Spartaz Humbug! 06:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello
Hey, I'm new here and want to introduce myself :) An edit that I made was reverted by rebecca1990, and I saw you on her talk page. You seem to have made many contributions here. Recently I made changes in Kelly Divine and Dana Vespoli. Do you have any suggestions for me?? Bmurso (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey Bmurso. I'm not that experienced as you're saying but i will try to help you :) Which edit did she reverted? --Croxx036 (talk) 08:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * oh, it was just a photo I changed in Francesca Le. But I was looking forward to expanding and creating some new articles, like the ones I mentioned above. Bmurso (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryan Driller


A tag has been placed on Ryan Driller, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nikko London, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages More and Unfinished Business. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Scott Disick restoration
I reverted it back to a redirect. The thing is, much of the content you restored is exactly the same as the last deleted version back in 2014. Why is that? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Scott Disick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Disick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scott Disick (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 19:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryan Driller


A tag has been placed on Ryan Driller, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Ryan Driller
Croxx036, please do not recreate Ryan Driller's article. He does not pass WP:PORNBIO yet. The two speedy deletion for Ryan Driller notifications above indicate that this is the second time you recreated his article after it was deleted at AfD. We're lucky it hasn't been salted. In case you don't know what that is, "salting" is when an article title is locked to prevent it's recreation. The process of unlocking a salted article is tedious, so please do not recreate Ryan Driller, it will be deleted and most likely salted. I will recreate the article myself when he actually wins an award that can satisfy WP:PORNBIO. Rebecca1990 (talk) 19:15, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Rebecca1990, in the same way Kendall Karson is not notable too since she has only 1 award, which she won with Ryan Driller at the 2014 XBIZ Awards. --Croxx036 (talk) 11:04, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Cody Cummings for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cody Cummings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cody Cummings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:08, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Hotrod (actor) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hotrod (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hotrod (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:31, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello
Hello. I'm newcomer in this site and i noticed you in Wesley Pipes' page. I just wanted to know if you can help me adding content to his page. Thank you :) --WesleyPipes FanGirl (talk) 15:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Restore the photo or anything similar and I will block you. Please read WP:UPNO: "In addition, there is broad agreement that you may not include in your user space material that is likely to bring the project into disrepute, or which is likely to give widespread offense (e.g. pro-pedophilia advocacy). Whether serious or trolling, "Wikipedia is not a soapbox" is usually interpreted as applying to user space as well as the encyclopedia itself, and "Wikipedia is not censored" relates to article pages and images; in other namespaces there are restrictions aimed at ensuring relevance, value, and non-disruption to the community. You do have more latitude in user space than elsewhere, but don't be inconsiderate. Extremely offensive material may be removed on sight by any editor." --Neil N  talk to me 20:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of J. Strokes


The article J. Strokes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards. No biographical content. No independent reliable sourcing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by admins since 2006. (talk) 21:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Johnny Castle (actor) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny Castle (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Johnny Castle (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:24, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Contribute to Draft:Scott Disick
Hello, I have received permission to draft an article, Draft:Scott Disick, and had the draft page unprotected by an admin. I saw that you had commented on the discussion of the article back in 2015, and thought you may be interested in contributing to the draft. Mukedits (talk) 22:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Rocco Reed for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rocco Reed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rocco Reed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Brian Pumper for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Pumper, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Brian Pumper (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)