User talk:Crshugrue

Crshugrue, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=583739095 your edit] to Stille reaction may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:19, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * complex, which can be generated in a variety of ways. Use of an 18- or 16- electron Pd(0) source  Pd(Ph3)4, Pd(dba)2 can undergo ligand dissociation to form the
 * Soc., 1984, 106'', 4833-4840.  Alkenyl epoxides  adjacent epoxides and alkenes_ can also undergo this same coupling through an η3

A little suggestion
Here are a couple of suggestions for what looks like a promising piece on the Stille reaction: You can obtain lots of diverse views from other experienced editors, but those are mine. Happy editing.--Smokefoot (talk) 02:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * WP:SECONDARY. Articles in wikipedia should rely on secondary sources - reviews and books.  Otherwise how would you know which of the hundreds of papers to select?
 * Wikipedia is not competing with a techie review journals. So keep the article general.
 * By "applicationss", at least in my book, mean someone something commercially valuable using this reaction, not just another journal publication, tens of thousands of which appear annually in chemistry.