User talk:Crsledge

Revert
Hello. I've reverted your recent contribition to Futures studies. The changes are still preserved in the article's history.

I reverted because I am concerned that the addition included WP:EDITORIALIZING language. If Diamandis says something frequently, we should cite a source which directly says that he cites this frequently, not an example of him saying something. This would also benefit from an independent source supporting that this WP:SPS is significant to the topic.

Another examples is saying that something is "important" without explaining who is saying that, or why it is important. I am not disputing that it is important, but this needs to be properly supported with sources. Those sources needs to be reliable by Wikipedia's standards. I don't think foresightguide.com is reliable, as I do not see where it has a "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" which is expected of Wikipedia sources.

Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)