User talk:Cruithneach77

Welcome!

Hello, Cruithneach77, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Stephen Brooks (hypnotherapist), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mephistophelian (talk) 11:01, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Stephen Brooks (hypnotherapist)


The article Stephen Brooks (hypnotherapist) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reliable, third party sources can be found to corroborate the content of the article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mephistophelian (talk) 11:01, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Brooks (hypnotherapist)


A tag has been placed on Stephen Brooks (hypnotherapist), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mephistophelian (talk) 11:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Brooks (hypnotherapist)


A tag has been placed on Stephen Brooks (hypnotherapist), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Famous dog   (c) 09:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Stephen Brooks (hypnotherapist) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Brooks (hypnotherapist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stephen Brooks (hypnotherapist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Meph talk 12:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Opinion polling for Scottish seats at the next General Election
In the run up to the next Scottish Parliament election, various organisations carry out opinion polling to gauge voting intention in Scotland.

The date range for these opinion polls are from the previous general election, held on 5 May 2016, to the present day. The next election is scheduled for 6 May 2021, unless a snap election is called.

Constituency polling
The opinion polls below are to gauge voting intentions for the 73 single member constituency seats which are elected through using the first past the post electoral system. {|class="wikitable collapsible sortable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:14px" ! rowspan="2" |Date(s) ! rowspan="2" |Polling organisation/client ! rowspan="2" |Sample size ! style="width:60px;" class="unsortable"| SNP ! style="width:60px;" class="unsortable"| Con ! style="width:60px;" class="unsortable"| Lab ! style="width:60px;" class="unsortable"| Lib Dem ! style="width:60px;" class="unsortable"| Green ! style="width:60px;" class="unsortable"| Other ! rowspan="2" |Lead ! class="unsortable" style="background:#FCF388; width:70px;" | ! class="unsortable" style="background:#0087dc; width:70px;" | ! class="unsortable" style="background:#dc241f; width:70px;" | ! class="unsortable" style="background:#FAA61A; width:70px;" | ! class="unsortable" style="background:#62A439; width:70px;" | ! class="unsortable" style="background:gray; width:70px;" | ! colspan="10" |2018
 * data-sort-value="2018-7-10" | 5–10 July
 * Survation/Daily Record
 * 1,002
 * style="background:#FCF388 " |44%
 * 24%
 * 21%
 * 9%
 * N/A
 * N/A
 * style="background:#FCF388 " | 20%
 * data-sort-value="2018-6-27" | 21–27 June
 * Panelbase/Wings Over Scotland
 * 1,018
 * style="background:#FCF388 " |41%
 * 27%
 * 22%
 * 6%
 * 2%
 * 1%
 * style="background:#FCF388 " | 14%
 * data-sort-value="2018-6-13" | 8–13 June
 * Panelbase
 * 1,021
 * style="background:#FCF388 " |40%
 * 28%
 * 24%
 * 6%
 * 2%
 * 0%
 * style="background:#FCF388 " | 12%
 * data-sort-value="2018-6-5" | 1–5 June
 * YouGov/The Times
 * 1,075
 * style="background:#FCF388 " |41%
 * 27%
 * 22%
 * 6%
 * 2%
 * 2%
 * style="background:#FCF388 " | 14%
 * data-sort-value="2018-3-28" | 23–28 March
 * Panelbase/Sunday Times
 * 1,037
 * style="background:#FCF388 " |40%
 * 28%
 * 22%
 * 6%
 * 3%
 * 2%
 * style="background:#FCF388 " | 12%
 * data-sort-value="2018-1-29" | 24–28 January
 * Survation/Daily Record
 * 1,019
 * style="background:#FCF388 " |42%
 * 25%
 * 25%
 * 6%
 * N/A
 * 2%
 * style="background:#FCF388 " | 17%
 * data-sort-value="2018-01-17" | 12–16 January
 * YouGov/The Times
 * 1,002
 * style="background:#FCF388 " |38%
 * 26%
 * 23%
 * 7%
 * 3%
 * 2%
 * style="background:#FCF388 " | 12%
 * style="background:#FCF388 " |38%
 * 26%
 * 23%
 * 7%
 * 3%
 * 2%
 * style="background:#FCF388 " | 12%