User talk:Cruizir

April 2018


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Same goes for. You cannot state that this person is a sockpuppet when no case has been filed at Sockpuppet investigations/Hjcjiu, let alone proven. See WP:SPI for instructions on how to file a sockpuppeetry report. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)


 * What????? Cruizir (talk) 18:48, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok, yes, the Hjcjiu pages weren't needed but I fail to see how they're attack pages. Cruizir (talk) 18:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppetry is a serious crime. When accusing somebody of sockpuppetry, the first thing to do is gather some hard evidence. Build a case around that evidence, and file your case at WP:SPI where others will assess it and act appropriately.
 * Instead, with [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions/Cruizir&namespace=3&offset=20180402202000&limit=4 these four edits] (also the creation of and, which have since been deleted), you have essentially convicted somebody unilaterally, without any evidence being presented. Please leave such tagging - including the creation of the category pages - to the closing administrator. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 19:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * All of such were based on edits to the Malu Trevejo page, with the exception of the suspected with was based off of edits to NBA Youngboy (a page one of the IPs edited). Cruizir (talk) 19:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * So did you file a WP:SPI? Did an admin confirm, block and tag? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)