User talk:CrumpPlint

January 2017
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, TrumpClinton, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 22:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

TrumpClinton (talk) 06:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Gracias!CrumpPlint (talk) 06:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tigrayans has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tigrayans was changed by CrumpPlint (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88754 on 2017-01-31T07:57:07+00:00.
 * ClueBot, that is fine you reverted my edits. My edits were not vandalism. I simply was removing undue weighted material. Article was about Tigrayans yet everything written was about Tigrinyas. Article needs major cleanup.CrumpPlint (talk) 08:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, I'm KNHaw. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Menelik II seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KNHaw (talk) 23:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reaching out to me on the edit. My specific concern had been the use of "atrocities" in the section title.  Usually, that's a huge red flag.  On reading the entirety of the section, especially the last few paragraphs, that does indeed seem to be a fair title of the section.


 * To be clear, I didn't doubt that atrocities occurred, just that it was the focus of a third of the section. But, as I read it... I was wrong.


 * Thank you for calling me out on it and thank you for your good work.


 * KNHaw (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for responding in such a quick manner. I only added the term in addition to the other terms, if we can shorten to one word that captures all the aspects of the section, that would be much appreciated. Anyways, thanks for considering my perspective.CrumpPlint (talk) 23:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks!CrumpPlint (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism
Stop vandalising pages on Wikipedia with your own agenda and confusing others. Resourcer1 (talk) 17:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, are you talking about Tigrayans? I understand if you disagree with my edits, but 'vandalism' is an awfully strong term, let's discuss our differences. CrumpPlint (talk) 08:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Block appeal
CrumpPlint (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Huon Where is the sockpuppet investigation that concluded this?CrumpPlint (talk) 01:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not aware of one, but Bbb23 is a CheckUser and made the connection. We don't need a formal investigation when there's sufficient evidence already. Huon (talk) 01:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a subjective conclusion not based on evidence and I was not giving any reason why? for this block by Bbb23.CrumpPlint (talk) 01:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually it's based on technical evidence linking your accounts. Huon (talk) 01:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

I disagree. This is a biased conclusion by Bbb23.CrumpPlint (talk) 01:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Bbb23 stated this in the "investigation against me": I shouldn't be blocked because Resourcer1 and Sennaitgebremariam had an edit war which led to Bbb23 deciding just to block me for keep from editting in the Tigrayan article "peaceful". I didn't receive any due process here. This is clearly Bias against me for no reason.CrumpPlint (talk) 02:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Unblock
CrumpPlint (talk) 04:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yamla I disagree.CrumpPlint (talk) 05:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Leaving Wikipedia

 * You Admins and Checkusers are really robots. You didn't even read the purpose of my "Leaving Wikipedia". I am not requesting to be unblocked, I am Leaving Wikipedia.CrumpPlint (talk) 05:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Then maybe don't use the unblock template? Goodbye, best of luck for the future. Yunshui 雲 水 10:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)