User talk:CrunchyOne

This portal should help you get started on Wikipedia. If you wish to pursue the case that you submitted to the cabal, I recommend that you try discussing it directly with other editors. The reason that your edits had been reverted was that they sounded a bit too much like an advert. It takes some practice to write neutrally, but keep at it. In your company's page, propose your edits on the talk page before making them, at least until you feel you have picked up on the nuances of neutrality. If you make edits to multiple areas on the page at once, something that works (but may not be entirely appreciated by others) is to make the edits, save them, copy a link to the comparison page, and then undo your edits. That link can be posted as a "Diff" page, so others can see exactly what you're proposing. To get to the diff page in the first place, click the "history" tab at the top of the page, then select your edit and the one directly below it. Then click "compare edits" and copy the URL.

I noticed from a comment you left to an editor that you were assigned to edit the article by PKR.com. This does constitute a conflict of interest. You can still edit the article, but as I said, be very careful about neutrality. I'm guessing that you were assigned to edit the article so that it reflects a little better on the company. If you want to do this, you would need to get citations of some sort and add only objective information. As long as you can establish it as fact, it's okay to add to the article, even if it is a positive fact. If you want me to review edits you want to make, or sources and facts that you want to use, for their neutrality, I'd be happy to do so.

If you ever have ANY questions, please don't hesitate to ask me. Tealwisp (talk) 03:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

On neutrality
Sorry it took so long to respond, I'm very busy with schoolwork. A lot of the objection to your edits was, I believe, based on the fact that you removed some references. Also, the reason that your edits are being called advertisement is that they promote features of the website, which does not necessarily increase the article's quality. For example, the piece you wrote about the TV channel and internet channel doesn't explain what relevance those things might have to a person outside of PKR. It's a vicious, cutthroat system, but if you read up on the content guidelines (there are a plethora), particulary WP:UNDUE and WP:SOAP(look at #5), I think you'll be able to edit the article better. As I think I said, if you were assigned by the company to edit the article, that does constitute a conflict of interest, and you may be barred from editing the page by reversion of your edits, resulting in a de facto ban, if you aren't careful to be neutral. Even if you do run into such an obstacle, you can always propose edits on the talk page. Tealwisp (talk) 03:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC)