User talk:Crusaders55

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you are interested in rugby union-related themes, you may want to check out the rugby union portal. If you are interested in contributing more to rugby union related articles you may want to join WikiProject Rugby union. You may also want to add to your userpage to keep up with Project announcements. You may even want to add these pages to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! -- Shudde  talk 11:49, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello, I'm Simplexity22. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Crusaders (rugby union) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 04:44, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Please stop massively taking over the article 2017 Mitre 10 Cup. User:Kidsoljah made some corrections to your edits which you reverted. Please edit in good faith WP:AGF and within a collaborative atmosphere. If your editing becomes disruptive you can be blocked.'' Steve Quinn (talk) 01:47, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your edits to Canterbury Rugby Football Union
You have made a lot of constructive additions to the article on Canterbury Rugby Football Union. However, please do not use what we call peacock wording which creates a non-neutral or promotional style. It should read as a factual statement, not a journalistic exercise in flowery writing. Your edits really were chock full of them, and I have tried to remove as many as possible, and have flagged the article accordingly. All the content you add absolutely must also be supported with references to reliable sources, so please go back and add sources to support all the historical accounts and score information that you have added. Regards from the UK. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:46, 5 September 2017 (UTC)