User talk:Crussell456

I want to edit the origin of the Russell name page to include evidence for a Norman French place name origin of the Russell name.Crussell456 (talk) 07:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Russell Surname Language of origin
I have altered the language of origin on the template on the Russell surname page from Anglo-Norman to English because the rus nickname for ruddy or red haired origin is is purely hypothetical. The documentary evidence shows that the name originated from a Hugh de Rosel who took his name from the village of Rosel in the Calvados area of France. The name Russell appears to have evolved through English in stages from Rosel probably to being spelled Rossel then Russel and finally Russell. Crussell456 (talk) 04:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Kingston-Russell
I would like to delete and rewrite the first two paragraphs of section 3 of the Kingston-Russell web page since they not only fail to fail to meet the Wikipedia standards as stated in the Wikipedia insert, but are also factually incorrect, as demonstrated by the latest research carried out by Ancestry.com and by citing (freepages.geneology.rootsweb) as the source. It would also mean deleting templates and references associated with the original paragraphs as being no longer consistent with the new paragraphs embodying the new research findings. Crussell456 (talk) 01:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)±


 * reply to Crussell456 The edit you refer to above was not new research, it is very old and fabricated information from Wiffen's work, and proven to be incorrect by 1901 in Round's book. The link you cited does not have any research by ancestry.com that supports "new" information. The Dukes of Bedford have never been proven to be descended from the Kingston-Russells. The father of Henry was Stephen (not descended from Theobald.) The undeniable source is Gladys Scott Thompson's book from 1930. The edit should be undone as it is misleading for other researchers. --SRussell (talk) 20:56, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Clan Russell
I would like to edit the Clan Russell page to mention new research findings by Ancestry.com linking the ancestry of the Dukes of Bedford to the Russells of Kingston-Russell. I would also like to mention the link between Clan Russell and the Russells of Kingston-Russell by citing 'Russell (surname)-Wikipedia'. I also feel it would be appropriate to delete the template with the picture of Hugh de Rosel by Neve as no longer consistent with the most recent research findings.Crussell456 (talk) 01:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Template Removal
I would like to remove the "originalresearch" template as I have fixed the issue.Crussell456 (talk) 00:08, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Russell (surname) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Russell (surname) was changed by Crussell456 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855661 on 2016-06-21T00:43:12+00:00.

January 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Russell (surname). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''In your first edit you removed a tag saying you "addressed the issues", which you obviously hadn't. Subsequent issues were no improvement. You want to do something for the article? Find information in reliable sources.'' Drmies (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Russell (surname), you may be blocked from editing. ''Time to stop removing sourced information and inserting your original research. If you keep this up you will be blocked.'' Drmies (talk) 02:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Also please exercise more care in labeling edits as 'minor'. Per WP:MINOR: "A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism. A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. . . . By contrast, a major edit is one that should be reviewed for its acceptability to all concerned editors. Any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it concerns a single word; for example, the addition or removal of 'not' is not a minor edit." The actions you took to the Russell (surname) article that you marked as minor include two categories that are explicitly listed as actions that are not minor edits: 'Adding or removing content in an article' and 'Adding or removing references / citations', while adding content that had already been contested cannot possibly be categorized as something that 'could never be subject to dispute'.  Agricolae (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Agricolae (talk) 13:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Russell (surname). Drmies (talk) 20:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop introducing incorrect information into Russell (surname) that directly contradicts the cited source. Such edits will be interpreted as vandalism and reverted. If you do not understand the cited source well enough to realize that your edit contradicts it, see the explanation on the article's Talk page. Agricolae (talk) 07:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)