User talk:Cruzer8

Image copyright problem with Image:Gbcrest.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Gbcrest.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gbff.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Gbff.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Gbff.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Gbff.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  U z EE  !! 01:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Brotherhoodgb.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Brotherhoodgb.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gbcrest.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Gbcrest.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  U z EE  !! 01:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Brotherhoodgb.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Brotherhoodgb.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  U z EE  !! 01:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Gamma Beta
I have nominated Gamma Beta, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Gamma Beta. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  U z EE  !! 01:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gammabeta crest.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Gammabeta crest.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Gamma Beta
I have nominated Gamma Beta, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Gamma Beta&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mr Senseless (talk) 21:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Gamma Beta
A tag has been placed on Gamma Beta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr Senseless (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mr Senseless (talk) 21:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

re: Gamma Beta AfD
Edits like this are just not cool, in fact covertly changing the article mentioned in an AfD discussion is vandalism and you could be blocked. If you disagree with a deletion nomination, then say so in the AfD discussion. Mr Senseless (talk) 21:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

If you want to nominate Omega Phi Gamma for deletion, follow the instructions here Mr Senseless (talk) 21:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Omega Phi Gamma
Hi. I notice that you attempted to nominate Omega Phi Gamma for deletion at Articles for deletion/Omega Phi Gamma, but you fail to indicate why you believe the article should be deleted. The rationale you posted in the debate appears to be the templated notice intended for the article's author or major contributors. If you fail to indicate why the article should be deleted, the debate may be Speedy Closed on a procedural basis, and you'll have to re-nominate. Please correct the problem as soon as possible. Thank you. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 14:03, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Please don't just nominate an article for deletion to make a point or if you feel your own contribution has been treated unfairly (which is the impression above is giving). Thanks, --Tikiwont (talk) 11:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)