User talk:Crvcrv21keops

A lengthy welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 03:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Hi Crvcrv21keops! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Egyptian pyramid construction techniques that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. WikiHannibal (talk) 08:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Dear WikiHannibal: excuse me for this, I figure it was correct but made a selection of "Minor edit" button by mistake. I fixed this error now. Thanks for your attention!

Hello, I'm WikiHannibal. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Egyptian pyramid construction techniques, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WikiHannibal (talk) 12:20, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Please stop
Wikipedia follows what reliable sources have to say about a subject. As an encyclopedia, it does not exist to promote new ideas. What you are writing about is interesting, but it's too soon to see if it will be significant enough for inclusion - see WP:UNDUE. When academic papers have been published and discussed, that will be the appropriate time. I also have to say that the way you write about it is inappropriate, read the article and related articles to get a better idea of how to present things.

Also, once you've been reverted more than once, please stop and use the article talk page to discuss your proposed edits with other editors.

Thanks. Doug Weller talk 12:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC)