User talk:Crveni5

September 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Australian supercentenarians. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 04:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

List of Australian supercentenarians
Please do not add commentary to articles as you did to List of Australian supercentenarians. Please use talk:List of Australian supercentenarians to discuss improvements to the article. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 03:16, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to List of supercentenarians from Asia
Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the List of supercentenarians from Asia article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 06:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

How can I find a talk page to an article which has been deleted? "Crveni5 (talk) 01:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Crveni5Crveni5 (talk) 01:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)"

Vandalism?
I said no such thing. Above, I said "Please do not add commentary..." You had added this this ''Who deleted this list? Please reinstate it.'' last September. Please don't do that. Also, please sign your talk with four tildes "~" Jim1138 (talk) 11:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

People remove information from Wikipedia articles without permission. All I seek is that article is returned to it's correct state. "Crveni5 (talk) 01:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Crveni5Crveni5 (talk) 01:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)"

List of Australian supercenturians
Mate you have 103 career edits pipe down, ok i made a few mistakes lol no need to get ur knickers in a knot princess xo JackETC (talk) 02:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

North Melbourne Football Club
We have to assume the lyrics of the club song are under copyright, as it's unknown what year the second verse was added. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

List of Japanese supercentarians
Hey I've had to reverse this edit as you didn't provide a source that tells her name. Please note that all sources used for her in this article refer to her as "Anonymous" and don't provide a name. CommanderLinx (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hoppers Crossing, Victoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Grange. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Your recent editing history at List of Australian supercentenarians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 18:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * It's not a good idea to edit war in this topic area. As stated in edit summaries, you need to provide a source that states a person has reached their 110th birthday before they can be added to an article. A two year old source from when they were 108 is not good enough. I strongly advise you to either provide a source or leave the page alone. If you don't you will find yourself blocked or topic banned. CommanderLinx (talk) 10:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Longevity articles
DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 18:29, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Final warning
If you disrupt any longevity article once more, you can expect to be subject to the enforcement of discretionary sanctions. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 08:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of Northern Irish supercentenarians, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. North America1000 08:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Northern Irish supercentenarians. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. North America1000 08:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Once an article has been de-prodded, it is not to be re-prodded, as per WP:PROD. Since you want the article deleted, I recommend starting an AfD discussion. North America1000 08:29, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Why is it not simple for people to understand? Either we have one article for United Kingdom, or there are separate articles for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. What is people's problem??? Crveni5 (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Crveni5

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. North America1000 08:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)


 * This is just to let you know that the user has withdrawn their report against you. However, it is advised that you don't reinstate Prod templates or put up Speedy Deletion templates when the deletion request is declined/objected to. If you still feel like the article should be deleted, it's best to proceed to discussing the article for deletion. Review WP:DP for more details. GUtt01 (talk) 10:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Postojna Cave, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Troglodytic ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Postojna_Cave check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Postojna_Cave?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Longevity Pages
I've been updating the Longevity pages for about 9 years. When you attempt to update the pages incompletely and inaccurately. This is of no help. It is more difficult to clean up your mess than to update the tables correctly. Please take note and react accordingly.TFBCT1 (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is free for anybody to provide contributions. Just because some people may have been editing articles longer than others does not mean they have additional privileges. Updates are done in good faith and as accurately as possible. Crveni5 (talk) 02:17, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The longevity pages are a specialized group with specialized conditions. I have been doing the daily updates for ten years on all pages.  I have also been cleaning up your "good faith" attempts for over 6 months.  As I said previously, although your "good faith" attempts are appreciated, they are not helpful.  They are always incomplete and more often then not "in error."  And they certainly aren't needed.  All updates are already done completely, correctly, and in a timely fashion.  It is more timely to re-do your mistakes.  Understood?TFBCT1 (talk) 16:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Life is too short to waste arguing with people like you.

List of Japanese supercentenarians
I am taking action against you for using multiple accounts (sock puppets) on page List of Japanese supercentenarians. To the result of reverting (3) of my viable edits, listing them as vandalism and in error and ultmately leaving the page itself in error. This will not be tolerated. I will be doing the PSI to have your account banned permanently.TFBCT1 (talk) 12:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * A ridiculous and unsubstantiated claim.Crveni5 (talk) 06:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Longevity articles
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Longevity, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system.TFBCT1 (talk) 12:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dandenong City SC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Kelly ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Dandenong_City_SC check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Dandenong_City_SC?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Paris_Jackson.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Paris_Jackson.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk  (We are the champions, my friends)  11:30, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

March 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of the verified oldest people, you may be blocked from editing. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 04:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

My edits are NOT disruptive nor can they be classified as vandalism. Wikipedia is open to all who wish to contribute and it is not your personal fiefdom! Personal attacks are not tolerated by Wikipedia and your constant harassment will be acted upon if it continues.Crveni5 (talk) 23:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

You are deliberately going against the long-standing consensus of longevity articles on Wikipedia, AFAIK all such lists; ties always go in chronological order. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 11:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

So please provide an example of where I have 'vandalised' a list on Wikipedia. Crveni5 (talk) 07:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Your latest edit! Despite the above warnings you've done the same thing yet again. Do you actually have any idea what you are doing??? DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 08:25, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Yet again you make accusations with no evidence to support your claims. I updated a number of pages this evening. All of them were left in chronological order. Crveni5 (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Well either you do not understand the concept of chronological order, or we are seeing different versions of the table (this is possible as the cache does not always clear when the viewing an updated page). So, as I see it, after my revert the order is in the men:

Whereas your edit looks like this:

So on my list because Tokuda and Barrso are both 111 years and 2 days but CHRONOLOGICALLY Tokuda was the earliest he appears ABOVE Barroso. Same for Pierro and Theobald, same age but as Pierro reached that age first he is above Theobald.

Either you are not seeing the same thing I am or you do not understand that chronological order means the person that reached the age first goes above the person that reached that age later. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 09:51, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020: Justify your editing behaviour at ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 23:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 02:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you CaptainEek. I have been the victim of bullying for the last five years by another Wikipedia user. Most of my edits have been keeping the articles regarding longevity up to date. Plus I edit some soccer related articles. Many people access and edit these articles. But only one person constantly harasses me claiming I am vandalizing articles. If that was true then other Wikipedia users would also identify this issue. But it is only DerbyCountyinNZ . Wikipedia has a clear policy regarding bullying of other users and I strongly suggest that they read and understand what they are doing is bullying in is a breach of this policy. Crveni5 (talk) 13:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , I think you have missed the point here. I didn't even mention Derby. I asked you to not mark your edits as minor when they aren't, which you seem to have completely ignored. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
creffett (talk) 18:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Just a reminder for both parties in the current AN/I thread - I see that your last notification was in 2017. creffett (talk) 18:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * It does not surprise me creffett that there have been previous notifications as DerbyCountyinNZ  has been bullying me since 2015. Look ay my user talk page. Crveni5 (talk) 13:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Altona City SC.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Altona City SC.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Banyule City SC.png
Thanks for uploading File:Banyule City SC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 15:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Northbridge FC.png
Thanks for uploading File:Northbridge FC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 10:33, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Heiko Maas, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rankersbo (talk) 09:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abbeyard has been accepted
 Abbeyard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Abbeyard help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! echidnaLives -  talk  -  edits  04:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:CSA Australia Savez.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:CSA Australia Savez.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 05:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Essendon Royals Crest.png
Thank you for uploading File:Essendon Royals Crest.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 13:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Hills United FC.png
Thank you for uploading File:Hills United FC.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 13:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Langwarrin SC.png
Thanks for uploading File:Langwarrin SC.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 11:56, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:FC Clifton Hill Crest.png
Thanks for uploading File:FC Clifton Hill Crest.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 15:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Glenorchy Croatia Crest.png
Thanks for uploading File:Glenorchy Croatia Crest.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 12:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Possible Account Hijacking
Your account may have been hijacked by someone to possibly vandalize the "List of Canadian supercentenarians" last evening. It appears that an edit regarding the death of Madeleine Stanley was undone by you account. No reason was given despite the requirement to do so when undoing an edit. I fixed the problem but you should change your password to prevent someone from doing this again. Thank you and good luck. Rklingmann (talk) 00:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)


 * You Rklingmann are an idiot. My account was NOT hacked. Where is your proof? Those edits were done by me. You made a mistake in one of your edits which I corrected but that clearly triggered you. Your comments "possible vandalism" are just a poor attempt to justify your actions of reversing my edits. Why is it Wikipedia attracts cellar dwellers like you? In future provide evidence before jumping to incorrect conclusions. Fool. Crveni5 (talk) 07:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)