User talk:Crwillis101

Welcome!
Hello, Crwillis101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Vsmith (talk) 01:09, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Your recent re-addition to Dalton Minimum here has some problems. First: the addition lacks relevance to the article as written. Second and more important: the content is sourced to a website which seems to fail Wikipedia sourcing guidelines and doesn't mention Dalton Minimum - unless I've missed something - thus failing WP:SYN. Please explain on talk:Dalton Minimum. Vsmith (talk) 01:09, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

First reservation: relevance. We are looking at the referenced article http://www.landscheidt.info/ First ref in article: Look at the first graph (white background) labeled "Sun-SSB Angular Momentum" and you will see at the right end of the first line the word "Dalton" in orange print. At the left end of the second line you will see the word "Minimum" in orange above the date 1810. Together they say "Dalton Minimum". Second ref in article: Look at the second graph (white background) labeled "Solar Activity Events in C14" and you see "Dalton Minimum" at the right end. Third ref in article: Look at the third graph (black background, blue wave lines) labeled "Jupiter Distance to Sun/SSB  difference". Look near the center at the bottom of the second line you will see "Dalton Minimum" in orange print. Fourth ref in article: Look at the bottom graph on the page below the row of 5 bright yellow "Suns". You will see the "Jupiter Distance to Sun/SSB difference" graph repeated. On this graph you see a green pitchfork in the center and the word "Dalton" appears under the left side of the green line. So there you have 4 references on the first page.

Second reservation: Sourcing Here is the definition from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RS The word "source" as used on Wikipedia has three related meanings: => the piece of work itself (the article, book),  <= the creator of the work (the writer, journalist), and the publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press).

I am referencing the website as an article in itself. What is the problem with that? I appears to me that you are a global warming activist who wants to deny any evidence of climate change which does NOT point to human activity. This article shows plainly how the planetary grouping of Jupiter, Neptune, and Uranus on one side of the Sun with Saturn on the other side of the Sun (which occurs about every 178 years) causes the Sun to go into a period of LOW activity. This causes sunspot activity to drop dramatically which in turn causes lower temperatures on Earth. This article suggests that Solar cycle 24 will be very low and Solar cycle 25 will be very low also - both of which portent severe cold in our near future. I wrote: Recent research and papers by Carl Smith indicate that the grouping of Jupiter, Neptune, and Uranus on one side of the Sun with Saturn in opposition (or nearly) on the other side of the Sun cause the Sun to drop into a state of lower activity resulting in severely reduced sunspot activity and lower temperatures on Earth. This configuration of planets occurs about every 178 years. It occurred in about 1631 which lead to the Maunder Minimum then in 1813 which lead to the Dalton Minimum and and again in 1990 which was predicted by Carl Smith and Theodor Landscheidt to lead to the next minimum called the Landscheidt Minimum which has already begun. This minimum will probably last until 2030. [3]

This is scientific evidence that the four great planets are causing climate change NOT anthropomorphic carbon dioxide emissions. Of course global warming activists want to suppress all evidence which disputes their thesis. You are one of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crwillis101 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 26 March 2013
 * Replied on the copy you placed on my talk. Vsmith (talk) 19:09, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, I'm Dougweller. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Vsmit that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 17:35, 26 March 2013 (UTC)