User talk:CryoMan86

February 2017
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jehovah's Witnesses without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''You removed more than a single source, despite your edit summary saying so; from my count, 5 to 10 sources, a whole paragraph. Please discuss your removal of content on the talk page.'' —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 06:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * In fact you have deleted material from both Jehovah's Witnesses and Criticism of Jehovah's Witnesses, with quite sneaky edit summaries ("Fixed some misinformation", "Updated content" and the completely false "Removed a biased and altogether unreliable source".) In the latter case you deleted comments by Heather and Gary Botting, Alan Rogerson, the sociologist James Beckford, Raymond Franz and James A. Beverley, the latter an assistant professor at Atlantic Baptist College in New Brunswick when he wrote his book. You clearly have an agenda to remove properly sourced material from reliable sources that is criticial of aspects of Jehovah's Witnesses. Removing uncomfortable facts is not the way to build an encyclopedia. Please stop. BlackCab  ( TALK ) 06:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)