User talk:CrystalMania002

Welcome
 Hello, CrystalMania002, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

CrystalMania002, good luck, and have fun. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 14:30, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Marking HP Inc. as a hoax?
Because you thought it "might be'" a hoax? Did you look at the references? Like this 2015 Fortune article? Shearonink (talk) 03:36, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at PowerTV. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You have repeatedly placed "hoax" templates on articles without doing any research & apparently because you "thought the article looked like a hoax" or it "might be a hoax". Shearonink (talk) 03:44, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello, I'm Shearonink. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:KrakatoaKatie/CSD/Keagan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''These user pages are clearly marked as being part of an educational/test section by the user and blanking the content is not necessary. If you think the content should be blanked or whatever then discuss that with User:KrakatoaKatie.'' Shearonink (talk) 04:01, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

To the next reviewing administrator: if you decline the unblock request, please revoke talk page access. This chronic sockpuppeteer isn't getting the message. They are not eligible for unblock consideration here and given the long, long history of abuse, six months is probably wildly optimistic. --Yamla (talk) 22:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)