User talk:Crystal Clear x3/Archive1

Carey Mulligan
Hi, I'm the user who tagged the Carey Mulligan article you've been working on for grammar and worldwide issues yesterday. The worldwide issue I was specifically referring to was the summary of An Education; the article currently refers only to the film's release and box office performance in the United States, and reaction to Mulligan by American critics. As An Education is a British film and Mulligan a British actress, attention should also be given to the film's release and performance in the UK (maybe even greater emphasis than the US release). Secondly, the article is in good need of a copyedit. I've left a note for extra help at WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (which, by the way, you are more than welcome to join). The grammar issues shouldn't hold up the article's GA review, since GAN is backlogged by about two months due to other users flooding it with about five articles each and then not reviewing any themselves. I do hope this helps. Bradley0110 (talk) 14:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for all your help. Crystal Clear x3 (talk) 05:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

peer review
I hope you don't mind but I added the Precious peer review to WikiProject Films/Review so hopefully it will get some more eyes from the project. -- Beloved Freak  19:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I see you intend to close the peer review. I have some points I was going to add to it, where do you think the best place for me to raise these points would be now? Regards, -- Beloved Freak  20:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh sorry I wasn't aware that you were going to add to the review, sorry if it caused you any in-connivence, I had closed it because someone said it that the article shouldn't have two reviews open (peer review and they were planning on reviewing the article soon), but your more than welcome to add any points and or list any problems with the article on it's discussion/talk page here. Crystal Clear x3 (talk) 20:57, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've left some comments. I've rambled on a bit, and as I say on the talkpage, it's just my opinion, just hope some of it helps.-- Beloved Freak  22:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Articlehistory errors
I've corrected the articlehistory errors on two recent GA nominations. Please have a look at the instructions at Template:Articlehistory; ah is only for completed processes. When updating an ah, you can scroll to the bottom of the talk page to see if the red error category is lit. Thanks! Sandy Georgia (Talk) 14:50, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Do the Bartman
Hello, excellent work on the article. Just a small suggestion, if you are planning on taking it to FA, it would be good to add a section on the composition/structure of the song, like in the FA Smells Like Teen Spirit. Some more reception would also be nice (though I realize that finding such info for 20 year old works can be rather difficult). Either way, great job, and it would be nice to see you become more active in The Simpsons WikiProject (unless you're more of a Michael Jackson fan and not really a Simpsons fan... In that case, you should ignore that last bit). -- Scorpion 0422  02:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the comments on the article, actually I'm a fan of Michael Jackson and the Simpsons. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 03:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

MJ award

 * Thanks! Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 21:50, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikiquette
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. DKqwerty (talk) 18:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries so that other editors know what it is you've done with each edit. DKqwerty (talk) 22:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Michael Jackson's This Is It: The Music That Inspired the Movie
Hi, I browse GAN alot but never actually review articles (I stick to Featured Article Candidates). Still, I thought I'd point out some issues you'll want to remedy on Michael Jackson's This Is It: The Music That Inspired the Movie:


 * Per WP:ALBUM, reviews in the infobox are being phased out as we speak. If you still wish to showcase reviews, a new review template has been created to go into the critical reception section. Personally, I like to forgo the new template and simply keep the reception details in prose, because I don't feel a template/infobox listing is all that helpful for conveying critical consensus.


 * You need to explain the certifcication levels in the lead section. A gold or platinum record means something completely different depending on what country you are talking about.


 * Aside from the lead, it takes until the third paragraph of the critical response section for a mention of the context of Michael's death to show up. That seems like the sort of thing that should be more prominent in the article.


 * The soundclips are not valid under fair use. To include them, you need to comment on the clip itself to warrant their inclusion, and the clips must accompany relevant prose sections (don't stick them in the tracklist). Compare to In Utero, which utilizes fair use soundclips properly. Also, five is an excessive amount. Keept it to one or two.


 * I'd recommend doing away with the Relesae History section. Details about various release formats usually work better as prose. Even if you do have a lot to talk about to warrant a Release History section, it should be in prose. Also, don't rely on retailers for verification. Stick to news sites. WesleyDodds (talk) 01:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 02:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Bad (album)
Hi, I removed your listing of the album at the good article nominees because the article says it is "in the middle of an expansion or major revamping". Please only nominate articles that you believe are ready for review and stable. Thank you Hekerui (talk) 22:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bringing it to my attention, I'm done working on the article, I just forgot to remove the tag. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 22:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

GAR notification
Letting you know I've started a good article reassessment for Emma Roberts. You can read my concerns at Talk:Emma Roberts/GA1. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 14:50, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Hi Crystal, how are you? My name is Marko. I would like to ask you to not remove the Invincible covers. There a lot of them but they are not doing anything bad. I would be pleaseful if you don't erase them again. Thank you.--MajklDzekson (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Okay, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 00:19, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Carey Mulligan GAN
Hey, I've conducted a GAN review for Carey Mulligan. Please see my comments at the review page. I'm sure they can be addressed quickly and that the article will pass in no time! And just so you know, I'm trying to get that arts-related GAN backlog cleared out a bit, so I may review some of your other articles in the near future... —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  17:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for all your help/input on the article, I think that I've corrected all the problems with the article on the GA review talk page, If there are anymore please let me know. Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 22:23, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Edit summary
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. — Mike   Allen   20:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Okay, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 20:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

We Are the World 25 for Haiti
There appears to be a problem with one of you edits, pertaining to the songs charts in France. You provided the reference "ChartsInFrance.net", and I do not feel it meets RS. Websites such as "LesCharts.com" are considered reliable sources and are frequently used, on the website I checked both the top 100 singles and top 50 digital singles and it shows no listing for the song, at all. I'm removing the information for now, if the song shows up on LesCharts.com then I'll re-add it's charting position, until then the information should be removed. If you have any problems please respond here or on the articles talk page. Thanks Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 17:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Charts in France are available on lescharts.com, disqueenfrance.com, musiqueinfo.com and chartsinfrance.net, and that's a reliable source that has existed for 10 years, you'll see Friday when lescharts.com will publish the full charts "We Are the World 25 for Haiti" will be #25. On Tuesday a news is published by chartsinfrance with some positions, Wednesday or Thursday we can found on Ozap the sales and this is just Friday that authorized the dissemination of full charts on various websites, and then Friday I will change the link chartsinfrance by disqueenfrance or lescharts. Thestreamer [talk] 17:57, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Emma Roberts GAR
The review is dragging on a bit... has progress been made on my remaining concerns? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 21:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I've just made numerous edits regarding the references, I think I've removed all the unreliable sources. I think I'd be able to properly format the references over the period of a few days, due you think you'd be able to hold the reassessment for that long? Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 21:40, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That's fine, I was just wondering if there were any problems. I'll take a look at what you've done in the meantime. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 20:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

We Are The World 25
I saw on the talk page that you are listed as an active user on the new version of We Are The World, and I was hoping for your opinion.

I added a number of Navigation baoxes at the bottom of the page for a number of artists involved. I limited the additions to only those artists that were conductors or soloists on the song, and who have solo navigation box templates (i.e. Adam Levine is a part of the template for Marron 5, but does not have his own solo template, therefore he has no listing.)

I wanted your opinion as to whether navigation boxes should be added for the multitude of artists featured only in the chorus. Personally I felt that adding boxes for all those artists would crowd the page. Again I welcome a second opinion. thanks for your time, --Spence The Chef (talk) 04:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


 * In my opinion, due to the number of artist with involvement in/for the song, I think it would be better suited if the page contain templates for artists that are credited as conductors or writers or soloist, because while people credited as being part of the chorus have involvement in the song, theirs too many templates to be listed and they really do not have significant involvement in the song. Listing their names in the "Artist for Haiit musicians" should be enough. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 04:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Non Free Images in your User Space
Hey there Crystal Clear x3, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Crystal Clear x3/The Only Exception. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of images removed today here


 * Shut off the bot here


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 20:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

The Only Exception
Please do not recreate content deleted via an XfD process: Articles for deletion/The Only Exception. If you wish to contest the deletion, you must instead do so at WP:DRV. Jayjg (talk) 02:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

We Are the World 25
I did a review and have only one concern to be addressed before I pass it to GA. Here is my review. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you please add a source for the track length? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I just changed the length of the song in the articles infobox to "7:37". Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 19:01, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You still haven't explained the variation in the song length. Where do the shorter, three minute versions come from? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Amanda Seyfried
Hello, just to let you know, I'll be taking on the GA review for Amanda Seyfried. Normally I'd go for an article higher up the list on GAN, but I happened to be looking at the article and saw it was a GA candidate. I'll create the review page now but it might be a day before I can give you any useful feedback. I tend to do GA reviews quite informally to help improve the quality of the article rather than give a straight pass/fail, so if you need any help or you have any questions during the review, just ask. Look forward to working with you! Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?   08:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks : ) Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 08:24, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Started the review at Talk:Amanda Seyfried/GA1 (suggest you add it to your watchlist) with a few suggestions. There's nothing major. I'll be back when I've had some sleep to give you some more feedback, but if you have any questions, i'll try to answer them ASAP! Have fun! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?   08:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I just finished correcting the problems you listed with the articles early career section (I responded on the articles talk page). If there are anymore problems with the article please let me know. Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 09:00, 5 March 2010 (UTC).
 * I've left you some more feedback. Same sort of thing really- a number of small, easily fixed things but no fundamental problems. The prose could use a little work, but that's my speciality on WP so I'll give it a copyedit for you when you're done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?   23:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I've just finished correcting the other problems you've listed with the article. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 00:51, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Nicely done! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?   06:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

The Only Exception
Hi, just FYI, you're article of "The Only Exception" has been restored; now that the single was released, the song has charted, and there are reliable sources covering it in detail, it passes WP:NSONGS. In my opinion, the articles that were already available at the time of the DRV would have been sufficient, but well ... Cheers, Amalthea  01:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 01:28, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Give it 2 Me FA
Hey Crystal, congratulations on the magnificent job on the MJ articles! I have addressed your concerns at the above article's FAC. Will you see if its fine and then support it? --Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 05:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, now I will definitely support the article for FA. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 05:18, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanky do. --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 05:29, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Stark Raving Dad
Hello, I saw that you are interested in improving the page to FA status. There is one thing I think the page is missing and perhaps you can help. Did Michael Jackson ever say anything, in an interview, book, etc., about the episode? Or, did any members of his family ever say anything? Also, I think the reception section could use a bit of expanding, so could you help with that too? Thanks, Scorpion 0422  19:46, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I haven't been able to find any reliable sources with any information about Jackson or his family members discussing the episode. Although, on the topic of the articles reception section, I added a quote box from one of the reviews. If there are anymore things I can do for the article to bring it to to FA status please let me know, thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 03:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Jayjg (talk) 15:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Lisa Simpson/archive2
Hi, can you revisit this FAC? Alt text has been added for all images. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 16:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Do the Bartman GA
Hey CC. The above article has some serious MOS related issues that needs to be sorted. Please take a look immediately. --Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 10:29, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Ryulong
Can you keep an eye on this user? Has a tendency to add immense unsourced trivias in the Gaga articles. --Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 03:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me? It's not unsourced and its not trivia. All I have ever added is the album art, captions for the album art, and a digital track listing.— Ryūlóng (竜龙 ) 03:49, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

WP:GANs for Michael Jackson articles
It's great to see someone else working to improve the articles for a specific musical artist. However, in regularly checking out the list of Good Article nominations, I'm seeing a pattern of mistakes/issues that you're making throughout the Michael Jackson articles you are working on and nominating. I've tried to correct them as I see them, but I think it would be to your benefit if you understood what these problems are:
 * Neglect/misunderstanding of possessive case - please read about possessive case, as there is a difference between "songs composition" and "song's composition". The same goes for "countries chart" (this implies multiple countries) and "country's chart" (this refers to specifically one country's chart). I've see this as a pattern throughout articles you've worked on. If you're referring to a specific quality/attribute/object of a noun, you need an apostrophe and then an "s", not just an "s".
 * Misspellings - misspellings should not exist in an article that exemplifies "Good" quality. These are easily solved if you open the article editing window in Firefox, as misspellings are underlined red.
 * Jon Pareles - I've seen this writer's name misspelled whenever written
 * Prose in the charting section - the prose in these sections gets pretty repetitive to read after a few charts are mentioned. Most sentences are structured the same way, starting and ending with almost the same format. Try to restructure sentences so they aren't so dry. In some cases, saying how long the song spent in the Top 10, Top 20, and Top 100, the specific date that it did this and that... it's almost too detailed. I would also eliminate the phrase "the charts issue date of" from your vocabulary. It seems unnecessary when simply listing the date will suffice.
 * Prose in the reception section - the prose is also very repetitive in this section. "John Smith, a writer for Magazine, said...." It gets kinda boring to read that 4 or 5 times. Writer may not be an accurate word to call them by, either. It's much easier on the reader to see something along the lines of "John Smith of Magazine...". Or in some situations, sometimes you probably don't even need to attribute the specific author. Attribution is important, but I think in many cases the publication is notable enough and the author is worth mentioning only when they are notable. Work on drawing parallels between other authors' thoughts: "John Smith said this. Jane Doe echoed these sentiments, saying... Bob Johnson differed from most critics, stating..."
 * Numbers - the general guideline is that numbers over ten are written as numerals, but you can write them as prose if you want. Regardless, if you write them as prose, make sure you use a hyphen to connect separate words. "Sixty seven" is just plain confusing, as it reads like "60" and 7". Use a hyphen to make it "sixty-seven", or just write the number as 67 to avoid any confusion.
 * Country names - "Norwegian" is an adjective describing something or someone about the country Norway.

I don't mean to be critical, but I've seen a pattern emerge and I think you should pay attention to these issues in the articles you work on. Work them out, but also let others contribute to the articles before hastily nominating them as Good Articles. I would also encourage you to seek a peer review for each article you work on before making a nomination. Good luck with future editing. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 13:16, 22 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for bringing this to my attention, as well as always correcting mistakes in articles I nominate for GAs. I've always tried to read things like "Manual of Style" from Wikipedia but I always got confused and bored, but now that its been stated in a brief way, I now understand it. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 14:01, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Award ceremony dates
Found a source for the ceremony you mentioned, posted it at the FLC. Let me know if there are others you can't find, I can help look for sources.  Jujutacular  T · C 15:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all of your help, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 15:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Dirty Diana
Hi Crystal, sorry for interupting. I am writing Dirty Diana article on serbian language and would like to put a image from the music video but i don't have it. Is it a problem for you to upload a image? Thank You and sorry again. --MajklDzekson (talk) 13:56, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem, here you go, File:Dirty Diana Music Video.jpg (the link) : ) Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 14:04, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much.--MajklDzekson (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Your welcome. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 14:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

The Split
The votation for the split of the Michael Jackson albums discography page was approved also by moderators and the moderators know better than us the rules of Wikipedia. I hope that you will contribute to the new Michael Jackson albums discography page, in particular for the Korean Charts, that are very hard to find ;) SJ [talk] 00:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC+1)

Hi old buddy
Hello there ...i see there is a problem with that stupid MJ Disc page..I made a comment here about it. PS you doing a great job man!!!Moxy (talk) 20:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I've responded on your user talk page. P.s., I'm a girl! Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 04:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Bad (album)
I took up the liberty of reviewing your GA nomination of this article. I only have a couple minor issues which I have raised here. Once those issues are taken care of, this should be good to go. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

GANs
Hey, I'm reviewing Thriller (song) and This Is It (Michael Jackson song) for you and there'll probably be more later. I've left some comments on the review for This Is It and am in the process of doing so for Thriller. If you'd drop me a line when everything's fixed, I'll almost certainly pass them. I would watch them, but my watchlist is huge already and I'll be doing quite a few today. you're welcome to get in touch if you have any troubles. Have fun! HJ Mitchell | April Fool!   16:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks : ) Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 16:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry to chirp in here, but noticed your peer review request for "This Is It". I'm not one to particularly pick up on whether an article needs a copyedit (unless it's glaringly obvious), but as a writer of two featured song articles and two featured album articles, I think it stands a good chance at FAC. It might be worth asking SandyGeorgia her thoughts on the article, as she usually has sound advice, and more importantly, she promotes or opts not to promote FAC nominations. LuciferMorgan (talk) 12:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 13:15, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tabloid Junkie
The article Tabloid Junkie you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tabloid Junkie for eventual comments about the article. Well done! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 00:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, but make sure that the other 18 that you have nominated are in better shape before they get reviewed. I have posted about this at WT:WikiProject Michael Jackson. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 10:56, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

You are the best!



 * Thank you so very much!!!! Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 00:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Don't Stop 'til You Get Enough
Hi, I have reviewed Don't Stop 'til You Get Enough and placed it on hold for seven days with some concerns. You can see my review here: Talk:Don't Stop 'til You Get Enough/GA1. Canadian  Paul  02:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I added a toolbox to the page ..will help-out tomorrow with some of the concerns!..Moxy (talk) 02:45, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 11:01, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, sorry, but I forgot to read the lead and there's one minor issue that needs fixing. Once that's been done, however, it'll be ready for GA! Canadian   Paul  15:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Speed Demon (song)/GA1
Nothing major, but just a few things that need fixing. If you;d drop me a note when you're done, I'd appreciate it. HJ Mitchell | <font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts?   23:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
liquidluck ✽ talk 00:16, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

HIStory
Your last uploaded cover from the album is fake (see MJ hand). Tb hotch Ta lk <sup style="color:#2C1608;">C. 20:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * . I can't believe I didn't notice the nintendo Wii in his hand, thanks for telling me, I probably would have never noticed it!! Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 20:14, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * =D No problem, but check again your last uploaded image.  Tb hotch Ta lk <sup style="color:#2C1608;">C.  20:16, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi There
I have reviewed Leave Me Alone and left comments here. GamerPro64 (talk) 01:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Bad (Michael Jackson song)
Hi again, I have reviewed Bad (Michael Jackson song) and placed it on hold for seven days with some concerns. You can see my review here: Talk:Bad (Michael Jackson song)/GA1. Canadian  Paul  03:07, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Another Day (Michael Jackson song)
Hi, I've reviewed Another Day for you. Only a couple of things to be fixed, as it's a well written and sourced article. This is my first GA review, so I'm glad I picked it. I have asked another reviewer to have a double check of the article and my review, in case I've missed anything or got something wrong. :) - <font color="Purple" face="Arial">JuneGloom07  <font color="Green" face="Times New Roman">Talk?  17:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 17:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Passed, well done. :) - <font color="Purple" face="Arial">JuneGloom07  <font color="Green" face="Times New Roman">Talk?  18:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Morphine (song)
No need to reply. It's just a comment. Seriously you think the article fail WP:NSONGS or it is just an impediment to make a GT of Blood on the Dance Floor: HIStory in the Mix album. Tb hotch Ta lk <sup style="color:#2C1608;">C. 19:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I honestly do not think the song is notable enough to have its own article. The song was not released as a radio or promo single, it did not chart anywhere, there is no information on the song (composition, or any of Jackson's inspiration for writing the song) and the background section is complete original research and speculation. The article has no reason to have its own article, which is why I re-directed it, not because of my planned Good Topic for B.O.T.D.F. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 19:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * As I told you it's my point of view. Also "no information on the song" -> background section; "composition" -> had an Album credit section; "inspiration for writing the song" -> his History of drug abuse after Pepsi commercial; "background section speculation" -> you remove all speculation about. And again, it's *my* point of view. Tb hotch Ta lk <sup style="color:#2C1608;">C.  20:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The song does not have any information on the song itself because the background section is original research, also, just because the song is about drug abuse, it does not mean it is about his, comments on the Pepsi commercial triggering his drug abuse is also original research. The song does not have any actual information on the songs composition (i.e. the key it is played in, Jackson's vocal range, it's chord production, etc etc). This response is my point of view on the article. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 20:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Death of Michael Jackson
The article Sunny Leone you nominated as a good article has failed, see Talk:Death of Michael Jackson for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Canadian  Paul  03:57, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello :)
I have made us something just to mark our project pages ...See top right corner of portal i have added it to most of the porject pages..we cant add it to articles, never the less...this coding i dont want others to see how its done, but i would like you to add it to your watch list pls Template:PartofWPMJ... Then deleted this message if possible. Thanks !! PS your the best !!! Moxy (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks and ✅ Crystal Clear x3 18:50, 8 May 2010 (UTC)