User talk:Crystal Frog

Speedy deletion nomination of Crystal frog


A tag has been placed on Crystal frog, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Warrah (talk) 23:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Crystal frog
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Crystal frog, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. iBentalk/contribs 00:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Two wrongs make a right. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:29, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to User talk:NawlinWiki. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. 5 albert square (talk) 05:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC)