User talk:Crystal rayne

Crystal Rayne: Author of such books as the fiction fantasy book Sagar'un - Tales of a New World and the historical romance novel Raven. Crystal Rayne is the Vice-President of PublicNation Publishing House. Born in 1971, is a mother of 7 children.

PublicNation Publishing House
Is a small publishing house in the United States that was started by authors Crystal Rayne, Konrad Hollenstein, graphic artist Tomaz Mrevlje and business executive Richard Will. http://www.prlog.org, http://www.bookwire.com/ Crystal rayne (talk) 15:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Tomaz Mrevlje
Graphic arts designer from Slovenia. Source (Amazon.com) He is also the Treasurer for PublicNation Publishing House. Crystal rayne (talk) 15:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Crystal Rayne
Author of such books as the fiction fantasy book Sagar'un - Tales of a New World and the historical romance novel Raven. Crystal Rayne is the Vice-President of PublicNation Publishing House. Born in 1971, is a mother of 7 children. Crystal rayne (talk) 15:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Sagar'un - Tales of a New World
Sagar'un - Tales of a New World is an epic fantasy book with high adventure all in one. The authors, Crystal Rayne and Konrad Hollenstein created this new world from scratch. The book has many common creatures from the fantasy world, such as elves, gnomes and orcs, but also has a vast array of new, and different creatures that have never been written about in the past. Copyright 2010 by PublicNation Publishing House. Copyright PublicNation Publishing House 2010 - 3D graphics by Tomaz Mrevlje of PublicNation publishing House

Crystal rayne (talk) 15:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Crystal Rayne.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Crystal Rayne.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 13:51, 26 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:51, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Fantasy sagarun.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Fantasy sagarun.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:52, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Crystal Rayne
A tag has been placed on Crystal Rayne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 14:46, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sagar'un


The article Sagar'un has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable book appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ttonyb (talk) 14:47, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Crystal rayne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  ttonyb (talk) 18:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sagar'un, to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. No more using Wikipedia to promote yourself, your company, and your book, please. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Sagar'un
Moved discussion from deleted talk page to User talk page.

I would like an explanation as to why this is even being proposed for deletion. I noted that it states that a major contributor has close ties to this article, however, i know this to be a false statement, due to the fact that the book was published by our company, and the only people that claim claim a close relation to the subject matter are the 2 authors, the graphic artist and the CEo of the publishing company, and since the person proposing this article for deletion is none of these people, I find it hard to believe that they think they are somehow connected to this matter in any way, shape or form. The book IS a notable book both in the United States as well as in Europe, so any claim that it is not notable is also false. Anyhow, those are my objections to the deleting of this article.


 * If the book was published by your company, would that not prove there is a close tie to the book?  This is not an article written by someone that is not related to the book - the company has a vested interest in the book.  You have stated the book is notable; however, you have not provided any proof that it is notable by Wikipedia standards.  Just saying so does not make it so.   ttonyb  (talk) 16:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


 * It is agreed that our company published the book. Would you rather one of our readers posted this article instead?  I am not entirely sure i understand why it would have to wait until an outside person would post the article, or, in reality, the difference it makes to have someone else post it instead of me.  As to the notoriety of the book, all one has to do is to google it.  Your statement that "just saying so doesnt make it so" and asking me to prove it, is easily proven by a google search of Sagar'un.  No where, have I noted anywhere in wiki financial statements of an item to prove it's popularity or significance.  Notable works speak for themselves.  Please explain what it is that you are wanting for the proof of the notoriety of the work, please.  If needed, when Sony Pictures International out of Munich Germany decides we are able to announce it, we can wait until this becomes a movie, and relist if need be.  It should also be noted that at this time, we have had talks with Sony about turning the book series into a morning cartoon for European and Asian television.  Personally, I would tend to think that these things would make the book and it's series "notable", but I understand if we need to post the article after this becomes a movie and television show.  If you need to verify these details, please feel free to contact Mr. Daniel Otto; Director of Aquisitions at Sony in Munich, Germany.Crystal rayne (talk) 17:14, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I suggest you read WP:NOTBOOK to determine what is needed to establish Wikipedia notability.  The burden of establishing Wikipedia notability lies with the author of the article not the reader.


 * I looked at the Google hits for the book prior to nominating it for deletion and found that the substance of Ghits was not up to Wikipedia standards.   Notability must be supported by  verifiable, reliable sources.  Please note there is a difference between "real-world" notability and Wikipedia based notability.  I suggest you read the links in the Welcome message in you talk page for further help.  If you have any specific questions after you read the links, please let me know.   ttonyb  (talk) 18:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I guess one has to wonder why there is a difference between "real world" and wiki notoriety. Notoriety should be just that, a notable subject matter or person.  If a person or thing is notable in the "real world", and wiki exists in the "real world", then one would think that what is notable in the real world should be considered to be notable in wiki as well.  Example of a person would be George Washington.  While he is a notable real world person, his time was WAY before the internet, yet, without even looking, I would guess that George Washington is listed in Wiki.  I personally don't see the difference between the two.  Also, I would like to note that "notoriety", the way i read the wiki manual, is not a truly defined term, but more of a guideline.  I do note the express language in the section, however, that specifically states "failing to satisfy them is not a criterion for speedy deletion."  Interested in your reply.Crystal rayne (talk) 19:21, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The need for Wikipedia vs. "real-word" notability stems from the need to provide verifiable, Reliable sources.  Remember, Wikipedia is not based on facts, but  verifiability.  Wikipedia notability provides a non-subjective way to establish notability.  It is assumed that anything that is "real-world' notable will also have verifiable, Reliable sources.  As far as not meeting WP:NOTBOOK not being a criteria for "Speedy Deletion", you are right; however, the article has not been nominated for "Speedy Deletion".  It has been nominated for a PROD based delete.   ttonyb  (talk) 19:46, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It appears the article was deleted as a result of it being,"G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: ad for selfpublished book"  ttonyb (talk) 20:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC)