User talk:Crystalsprings

December 2023
Hello, I'm BriefEdits. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BriefEdits (talk) 05:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Evan Low, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BriefEdits (talk) 21:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Evan Low. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please refer to WP:NOR. BriefEdits (talk) 21:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi Crystalsprings! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Evan Low
For the purposes of an encyclopedia article, one opinion piece criticising a politician does not support the claim that "Critics argue that his support for education and equal access bills that support discriminatory policies against Asian Americans reflects a pattern of voting against the interests of Asian American constituents." This violates the guidelines of WP:BLP where negative information about a subject must be supported by reliable sources. ... disco spinster   talk  22:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Crystalsprings, you're also edit warring to restore your preferred version of the article. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable (and they are not here). All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Just piling on a bit here. You have now added the same content seven times without attempting to use the article's talk page at all. Please use it! That is the only route available if you are serious about adding content to this article. Beach drifter (talk) 02:14, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Blocked 48 hours for edit warring
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC)