User talk:Crystalwizard

Speedy deletion of Jason Waltz
A tag has been placed on Jason Waltz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. B figura (talk) 04:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jason Waltz
A tag has been placed on Jason Waltz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.

Flashing Swords ezine
Removal of tags which request further improvement and sourcing from an article, such as you did at Flashing Swords ezine, could be construed as vandalism. Please make sure to provide sources and improvements before you remove those tags. Corvus cornix talk  20:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

I own the magazine. I'm the publisher. I'm pretty sure that I have the right to edit the entry.

Incidentally, there would be more tags to internal pages if the individuals that roam around Wikipedia weren't so interested in deleting stuff.


 * Actually, considering that you have a substantial conflict of interest, it's probably better if you didn't edit it then. Additionally, even if you do own the zine (which no one here can verify, or even needs to, unless you have copyright issue), you do NOT own the article. Please don't remove tags without addressing the concerns raised by them. Best, -- B figura (talk) 05:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Editing is open to everyone on Wikipedia. Whether it is your magazine or not, Wikipedia is not here to serve as a PR site for you. Corvus cornix talk  15:42, 6 May 2008 (UTC)