User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 21

NYC subway RfAs
Hey, I resent that avalanche comment! =)

Thanks for the support vote, by the way! Larry V (talk &#124; contribs) 19:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Borat
Yea, that link is funny. they really do that kinda stuff in kazakhstan. So why do people think Borat is derogotory to Kazaks?

One has my fun list the other my working list
If I need to see if any new stuff has poppped up for by studies I check one list, other list for nondrugery stuff John wesley 20:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Article on terrorism
You may find the article Terrorists of Pakistani origin interesting. It may be deleted soon in perhaps a few hours.

If you have any views on having such articles on Wikipedia, please do share them at Articles_for_deletion/Terrorists_of_Pakistani_origin

--Robcotton 01:03, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Border & Background
Could you please add a red border and a green background to my userpage, I can't do it. And yesterday I asked User: Master of Puppets to do it for me, he did it, but my text was shrunk and the border was not joined in places, and in some places was not even there, he said it displayed fine on his PC, could you do it? PS you can have a look at it, by clicking on the Master of Puppets version, it does not look good -- Lego@lost 04:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Age as a RfA criteria
I was recently browsing through editor's standards for becoming an administrator and noticed that you, as well as others, felt that age should be a criteria. I come to you as I have seen you around and respect the work which you do. I am wondering what exactly the rationale behind this criteria is. From my viewpoint if an editor can do good work at a young age then they can only improve from there. In addition age does not always correspond to maturity or ability to make valuable edits. In fact, I would theorize that it almost never does. Those who are young and choose to contribute their time to making a free and useful encyclopedia seem to be generally those who can do that well. At any rate I was wondering if you could please explain your rationale to me. While I realize I do not have an actual right to this I would appreciate if you did. Thanks for the time, and thanks in advance for a response. Sorry Guy 06:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Status of Sanhedrin article
Howdy - it looks like Historian2 and Daniel575 are making significant headway in at least communicating with each other and agreeing on methods of discourse. I am going to watch the page, but step back for a while and see if they can sort out their disputes. -- Aguerriero  ( talk ) 12:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

re: RfA
Thanks brother. I know I will be a vastly more effective editor with the tools. Now... to spam voters or not to spam, that is the question. -- Aguerriero  ( talk ) 15:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I thought it was considering good form to thank voters? :) -- Aguerriero  ( talk ) 15:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Never Stop Doing What You Love
I was in the middle of responding to the merge suggestions when the discussion was closed. I believe the compilation is a Beatles/McCartney collector item, more relevant to Beatles and McCartney collectors than it is to Fidelity Investments. The page had previously been linked by Paul McCartney and Paul McCartney discography, but not by Fidelity Investments. I believe people following the redirect will justifiably expect to find information about the track listing, which was deleted in the merger. Yet adding the track listing to the Fidelity article is certainly beyond the scope of that article. Rohirok 19:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Goodbye
Hey crazy, This is Legolost through and IP account, I can't edit wiki anymore my browser and graphics are completly stuffed after i changed my sig goodbye, this is the final comment I make Goodbye crazyrussian -- 219.88.55.91 04:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

re: speedy
I honest could never have guessed that such a wide array of stuff would pop up in that category. I have questions on almost everything I look at. Good thing I have a trusty Russian to ask. -- Aguerriero  ( talk ) 19:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Pere Lachaise Cemetery
I inserted your Pere Lachaise burials Category in a few articles and removed them from your list. Will be glad to help out with more as soon as I get a chance. Also, take a look at Jean de la Fontaine on the list. I can't see how he could be buried there. He died in 1695 and the Pere Lachaise cemetery wasn't built for another 109 years? - C. C. Perez 22:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

The reburial of Heloise is documented but I couldn't find anything to that effect on La Fonataine. However, it is quite possible. - C. C. Perez 11:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Boston Conservatory
Hi, not sure what happened here, but I think it undid what you did and thought I should let you know.Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 04:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

What the...
You're no longer an admin now? --Nearly Headless Nick 11:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I have been recalled and voluntarily resigned to stand for a re-RfA on or about October 7th. - CrazyRussian talk/email 11:02, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I think, I must have missed a lot of you-know-what. I am supporting, whatever the case. --Nearly Headless Nick 11:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * That hampers you a lot. ANI is going to be running hot :) Viridae Talk 12:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * May I ask why the wait till october 7th? Viridae Talk 13:58, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

You can visit the probable location of the renomination, and put the page on your watchlist. When it's created, you'll be the first to know. (Well, except for me. I hope to get in first opport or suppose.) AnonEMouse (squeak) 16:17, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

hello
i m new user of this site i m confuse about how to use it how to create my on page n talks can u help me plz????? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Saimashaikh (talk • contribs).

copyvios
So, I have now read in one place that we leave copyvio history in place unless the copyright holder requests that we remove it, and in another place that I should delete the article and restore the non-copyvio history. Which is correct? :) -- Aguerriero  ( talk ) 15:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Wangi/RFA
Thanks for your support on my RfA. Give me shout if I can be of help. Thanks/wangi 00:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

ProfTest
I did not deprod you, just the article. Please don't take things so personally. You feel the article is worthy of deletion, I had a look at the article and thought that the person the article is about may be notable (not that he is, just that he may be) and that the reason for deletion was not binding. Feel free to take it to Afd and build consensus. Catchpole 14:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello
Hello! Thank you for the welcome to Wikipedia. By the way, how do you make a comment box on your talk page like the one you have? It seems very useful. PreferenceSeries 03:56, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Complex Issue
Going on. What is your understanding of someone taking a picture of a (notable) poster of a person, and claiming fairuse. Would it be fairuse for the poster or of the subject? Just curious about your thoughts, probably going to be on DRV. Which, btw, I have two that I've closed up there. =) Yank  sox  03:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw that on yr talk. Imagine a screenshot of a commercial that feature Nasrallah, may he meet the 72 virgins speedily in our days: would your analysis be any different? The poster is a creative work and bears copyright. Fairuse for the poster, for sure. - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comment! Yank  sox  04:09, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you, that was very convenient. By the way, are you affiliated with Fordham? PreferenceSeries 04:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC) BTW, if that is the wrong barnstar, I apologize!

Affiliation with Fordham Law
I am unaffiliated with Fordham Law. It seems to me that some of your edits in that article have been biased, and that you have reverted some of my neutral edits to their biased state. Also, some of your biased edits were done so without citation. Edit: Added sig. PreferenceSeries 04:44, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Maimonides remark
Moved that to Temple Mount, where I did a major overhaul on the section 'Jewish law regarding entry to the TM'. --Daniel575 | (talk) 13:12, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

help
This 'Historian' now thinks that 'Sanhedrin' is closer to Neturei Karta than to Kach. He is also seeing a fusion of Kach and Neturei Karta, since 'both oppose the state'. I tried to clarify it, giving some examples of the thought of NK and Kach (without naming either), and what is his conclusion - 'the press releases of the Sanhedrin so far are more like NK'. Please, please, try to explain to him that I am right. How do you explain Jewish politics to somebody with the brain of a fish?? --Daniel575 | (talk) 15:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

WP:MUSIC and TruthbringerToronto's RfA
G'day Alex,

I am, of course, always pleased to hear from you. I'm not entirely sure how you've managed to implement 10 000 edits and 2 000 unchallenged deletions since yesterday afternoon, but I have no doubt it would have been a bloody impressive sight ;-). I was reacting to the idea I interpreted as "oppose because he doesn't vote the way policy requires him to", which I find quite repugnant for all sorts of reasons.  Any past interactions we've had were far from my mind at the time; I would have responded the same regardless of who it was I thought making the "troubling assertions".

Relax, dude. When I'm around (and it's not so often these days, I know), I say a lot of things. Sometimes I could probably be accurately described as an "opinionated prick", although people tend to take pains not to do that on Wikipedia (you're free to be the first, if you'd like ;-)). If I'm being unfair, feel free to say so, but remember that I would have been unfair to anyone.  I'm really not targetting you (or anybody else); just, well, being an opinionated prick.  fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 18:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Pace/Template abbreviations
I don't think that Pace should be considered an NYC law school. It's 25 miles north of the city, and on the Fordham Law article there is a sentence mentioning that there are only 8 ABA approved law schools in NYC. Perhaps an ABA list of schools could be useful?

Also, in the Template:Law schools in New York City, it seems like there should be some consistency with the names. Right now "New York Law School" still has "Law School." You probably know better than I do: how do people usually refer to these schools in everyday speech? Do they say "Law School" or "Law" at the end, or just the main name? Whatever the case, could you edit the template to make them all the same? Thanks. Edit: forgot sig PreferenceSeries 23:45, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Yort
I did it for Yanksox, hope you don't mind =). alpha Chimp  laudare 01:24, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Which reminds me, do you have any ideas for tools that could semi-automate some of the administrative processes? I've been trying random peoples' monobook.js files but I can't find anything beyond Voice-of-All's scripts. alpha Chimp  laudare 01:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, lemme finish this block first. alpha Chimp  laudare 01:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Fidelity Investments
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your obvious efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we'd like to point out our policy against original research and for citing sources for the information you provide. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in checking the factuality of that article. - MSTCrow 02:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Woops
My bad for adding Category:Law schools in New York to the St. John's article, I don't know what I was thinking.

I'm Back!
I got someone to fix that anoying stupid problem (thank you Mr. Lefty & Super-Magician...) So I'm back on track, hopefully I'm not too late for your recall, and don't worry you've still got my strongest support. Anyway... -- Lego@lost EVIL, EVIL! 03:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Did you see this?
Hi, Crazy, good to see you around. I noticed an exchange you had with a less than cordial user. For a little background: did you happen to see this? Bishonen | talk 08:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC).

Kpjas
Maybe my current form of friendly sarcasm doesn't carry well. If you're truly offended, then please accept my apologies. Also, please tell me; that way I can modify my behaviour in future.

As to the subject at hand; I'm somewhat puzzeled why you'd state that an experienced admin (who was one of the earliest members of wikimedia) hasn't had enough community experience.

There's really not so much difference between different wikis. Even Uncyclopedia admins do very well on en.wikipedia, I've found. Knowing that, an admin from a different wikipedia is basically just in a different corner of his home turf.

Could you explain your own opinion on this please?

Kim Bruning 09:15, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Never offended. Almost never. Vote withdrawn, thanks. - CrazyRussian talk/email 11:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

You know...
If they win tonight, and maybe pull something out of the next series, we can breathe down your neck...maybe... Yank sox  12:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * LOL! I thought we alreadly established that I yank oxen around when they misbehave. Yank  sox  12:14, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Or I could be a Yank (American) that wears sox, eh? Have you actually thought out this situation here? :P Yank  sox  12:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Five Discs
I have permission from Wikipedia to post this material. I own www.destinationdoowop.com and I sent an email to the permissions email address at Wikipedia to clear my posting this material. Its not a copyright problem. Please clear this message and let the material be posted. Thank you.

Yukon Jack

Ba River
Yeah, I know it's weird, but I've run into these kinds of pages before, and I believe there's some precedence in allowing them to stand. I could be wrong on that. --Fang Aili talk 16:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Found the link I was thinking of: see here for more. I'm not sure I agree with the logic, but I let it lie. --Fang Aili talk 16:59, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and nom it again if you like. I'll stay out of it. --Fang Aili talk 17:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I've prod'd it, seeing as some people might object to its deletion. --Fang Aili talk 17:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Please comment on proposals
please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Orthodox_Rabbinical_Biography_Collaboration_of_the_Week#Time_to_modify_rules.3F JJ211219 18:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
For fixing that for me (RE: Articles for deletion/Great Liberal Backlash of 2003 (second nomination)). Peace. Morton devonshire 02:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Limbaugh afd
Well, you have something of a point, looking at the sources none really seem to confirm any of the jargon as much as I seem to have thought. Perhaps I should have left it open longer for an admin willing to walk into the buzzsaw of what would have certainly been a highly controversial delete, but it had been open for 11 days (!) already. At this point DRV might actually be a good option... reversing myself at this point would frankly be awkward and probably lead to even more confusion and uncertainty. I am still thinking about it, but a reversal seems unlikely, sorry... it is/was a tough situation. --W.marsh 03:49, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 21st


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

RE: RfA
Hehe. For what it's worth, it took me all of five minutes to find references from two major sporting publications to appropriately source that article  hoopydink  Conas tá tú? 14:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Asked to Email
You asked me to email you. I'm on real life vacation now, so have irregular access to the web and as good access to Wikipedia as I do to my email - and I look at Wikipedia more than once per day. If we can do the conversation on my talk, or some other talk page it will probably go faster. GRBerry 17:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I took a look
I took a look at the history of my talk page, to see what interactions we have had before.

I saw you had written to me about my misuse of stubs. I saw that in the last message you left about that you said:something about me helping to fix the problem I created, "if it isn't beneath you". I don't know if you noticed that I removed the problematic stubs I had put from a great many articles.

For the record I didn't ignore your concerns.

I also took a cursory look at your recent User Contributions. I briefly scanned through some of the notes you exchanged with User:Kingboyk, and I noticed that they contained a serious misconception -- that the Guantanamo articles were "duplicates". They aren't. I left him this note.

Let me repeat the 2nd most important of that note. I regard myself as a cooperative person who takes other wikipedians concerns seriously, and who will work cooperatively towards a compromise. -- Geo Swan 23:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

duplicates

 * Sorry, not "duplicates". In this edit you referred to them as "carbon copies".  --  Geo Swan 03:43, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

inappropriate?
Maybe I am missing something. You left comments on Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Daif Allah Neman Al Sehli that three of the votes there were solicited. Your edit summary said it was inappropriate. Would you mind explaining to me what you thought was inappropriate? Yes, I left five brief heads-up notes on the talk pages of some people I know have shown interest in previous nominations to delete articles about Guantanamo detainees. No, I didn't contact everyone who has voted on previous nominations. I didn't contact people who had voted for deletion in previous nominations. None of them have asked me to give them a heads-up. But, during previous nominations, where those interested in deletion included wikipedians who explained their vote in blatantly political terms, a number of those who voted to keep contacted me afterwards and asked me to advise them of future attempts at deletion.

Note: I didn't ask them to vote in a particular direction. I merely suggested they might want to offer an opinion. User:GRBerry has voted in previous nominations. And he makes his decision based on his opinion of the merits of each article. I didn't know, for a certain fact, how any of those five would vote.

So, if giving a heads-up to an interested party is inappropriate, how would you describe this exchange or this exchange you had with User:Kingboyk?

We are all supposed to WP:AGF. Surely you can appreciate that when others discuss one's work in a disrespectful manner it makes it harder to assume good faith on their part?

I'd be interested in your opinion in the discussion in this nomination -- Articles for deletion/Shaker Aamer. -- Geo Swan 03:43, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for coming on my talk page! --Dean Rivers 00:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Realignment
I am, as you surely know, no fan of Dubya and no particular fan of Israel, but I am, to be sure, even less a fan of less-than-good articles. If you've a moment in which to look at this one, I'd be much appreciative. I certainly don't think this use of realignment to be more common, especially relative to politics, than that at Realignment election, and I rather think that, even as the old sports-specific page (now at Realignment (sports)) ought to have been moved, Realignment ought to be a dab page (WP:DAB surely counsels against our preferring one article where a term holds no primary meaning. Feel free, at your convenience, to drop me a line... Joe 04:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Prompt response, that. Three succinct questions: (a) do you think the term is altogether notable in this context? (b) do you think Realignment ought to be a dab page? (c) am I nuts, or is some significant cleanup in order? Joe 04:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah
Thanks for catching that. I need...sleep. Yank sox  04:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Cheeky monkey...
Lol - Yep - didnt take that too well huh? Thanks mate, you're (back) up next! (I would nom you, but may be best if I dont!) Thanks again - GI e n 05:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Archiving
Do you have any basic archiving standards to archive a page, if so what are they, and also do you cut and paste or move to archive? -- Lego@lost EVIL, EVIL! 06:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the RFA Thanks!
Yeah, what I said in the header... haha! Thanks again. --ZsinjTalk 10:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Does it have to be on Wheels?
Does Yanksox' followers page have to be on wheels? Have any other ideas?-- Andeh 11:03, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
I was beginning to think there was nobody else here. I'm curious, how is this place run? Just H 14:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Administrators? I'm curious, how does that work? Are they like employees or something? Sounds like a sweet job.Just H 14:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Do you speak Russian?
I take it you speak Russian, some input over at Articles for deletion/Mithgol would be greatly appreciated.-- Andeh 15:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I think there's already a userbox like that already, but looks different.-- Andeh 15:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

No probs
Buddy, you need your buttons back :) -- Samir   धर्म 16:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Can you invite Mithgol to come to en? I think that guy would be a riot here!  -- Samir   धर्म 16:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Israel bilateral relations
Hi, I could use some support in opposing merging Israel-Venezuela relations into (nothingness) Foreign policy of Hugo Chávez. Anything you can add to Israel-Venezuela relations, Israel-New Zealand relations, and Israel-Japan relations would be very appreciated. Respectfully, Republitarian 18:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for the oppose vote. Your support in this matter is valued. Respectfully, Republitarian 03:45, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Gevalt
Oh, Brother in Moses, how could you?!! Don't you know we don't have enough controversies and debates around here? I expected a good fight and you spoiled it. I guess I'll have to plot something else now. ←Humus sapiens ну? 01:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Geez
Who do you think you are? What, spreading you crazyness to all the farthest corners of Wiki-land. Yank sox  04:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I suppose the question is what language do you not speak. Yank  sox  04:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Farstan
Salut mon ami fou... je ne connais pas de telle casse-croûte, et, particulièrement parce qu'il y a peu d'information dans l'article, je suis en accord avec la suppression proposée. -- Samir  धर्म 05:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
I'd like to thank you kindly for the message on my talk page - it was quite a surprise, and I'm very grateful for it. Don't imagine that I've been all that stressed by you guys: it hasn't been quite as horrible as you might imagine. Thanks also for the offer of chatting on Google Talk. I'm not much of a fan of instant messaging in general (I'm only on MSN with any regularity, although I have accounts on a number of other services, including that one), but I'd be happy to talk to you sometime if we happen to run across each other. For reference, my ID is daveydweeb (AT) gmail (DOT) com. I'll see you around sometime, I guess. :) RandyWang ( chat/patch ) 12:47, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Mithgol
Mozhno. I believe in a non-violent approach to troll genocide :)&mdash;Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Mayo
Et tu, Brute? Please, reconsider.&mdash;Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Reconsider what? Translating - or asking? - CrazyRussian talk/email 13:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Translating, of course. It's funny, yes, but hardly encyclopedic.  Not a lot more encyclopedic than Mithgol himself, I'd say.&mdash;Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)