User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 3

Re: Articles for deletion/Gilliver
Would you please also delete Gillivery as per nomination? Thanks. - the.crazy.russian   τ   ç   ë  02:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello! The article has been deleted.  Regards,   (aeropagitica)    (talk)   05:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it was showing as deleted on my screen. Have now refreshed and confirmed that this has been deleted.  Regards,   (aeropagitica)    (talk)   05:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. - the.crazy.russian   τ   ç   ë  05:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

shalom
A kosherin Freylichen Pesach!

help a jew:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davidic_Dynasty

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rebbe (talk • contribs).

Bloomberg
Hey there, thanks for the message. Personally I agree with you. But the issue here is that the critieria by which administrators evaluate an article for whether it can simply be deleted without community consensus is whether or not the article itself makes an assertion of the notability of its subject. In this case, the article's assertion of notability is that this person is Michael Bloomberg's mother -- therefore, assertion having been made, it's no longer a candidate for speedy deletion. There then arises a separate question: is this assertion of notability enough for a Wikipedia article? The criteria for speedy deleting an article doesn't allow one administrator to answer the second question; that's why I removed the speedy notice. Only the community can, together, decide whether or not this assertion of notability is enough to warrant its own article. You can list an article for deletion consideration here. Hope that makes sense. &middot; Katefan0(scribble)/ poll 20:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * If there's an assertion being made, then that automatically removes it from consideration as a speedy. It's up to AFD voters, then, to decide whether the assertion of notability is a hoax, wrong, insufficient, etc.  Plain and simple.  An appeal to notability based off the celebrity status of one's son is definitely an assertion. Whether or not that assertion is right, wrong, inadequate or anything else is up to AFD to decide. &middot; Katefan0(scribble)/ poll 20:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * You changed your message to include some specific examples. If, for instance, the article had said "Charlotte Bloomberg, Michael Bloomberg's mother, is an alien," then I probably would've just fixed it myself and removed the speedy tag (that would simply be vandalism).  If it was an article about a person about which it was not obvious that this person has some claim to notability (however dubious) and asserted that this person was an alien with no other content or context, then it could be speedy deleted as G1: Nonsense, G3: Vandalism, A1: No context, etc.  But of course this situation was far different. &middot; Katefan0(scribble)/ poll 20:29, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * That's one way to fix it. =)  Thanks &middot; Katefan0(scribble)/ poll 20:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Meir Lichtenstein
I've tried to address the issue (or punt gracefully), and I had hoped that leaving the quote at the end would get the info across without characterizing Mayor Meir directly. My question for today is that if it's not because he's "ultra-Orthodox," then why is this Mayor different from all other Mayors? Is he notable if it's just because he's Orthodox (or Jewish)? Chag kasher v'sameach! Alansohn 20:43, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

SFEDI
Yes, SFEDI is on the web at www.sfedi.org.uk and ww.sfedi.co.uk TobyJ 16:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Ropshitz
Please see my comments at Talk:Ropshitz - Jmabel | Talk 04:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Jackiey Budden
Hi there!

You have categorized Jackiey Budden as an actress. Would you really describe her in that way? She is the mother of a reality TV contestant and a tabloid figure in her own right. I wasn't sure how to categorize her myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Triangle e (talk • contribs)

Cardozo alums or students are putting faculty pages
Like the one for Lester Brickman; as a Fordham student aren't there any famosos professors? John wesley 16:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

illinois-school-stub
Is that new? I don't see that here... Amalas 20:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * You do have a good point about not cluttering the tree with 50 state-specific school stubs. It's already a bit unwieldy in the geo-stub area.  I see now that if I click on the Category for US-midwest-school-stub, it list the state-specific stubs on that page.  I typically just use that main stub type page, but I guess I'll have to dig a little deeper from now on.  Thanks for pointing this out, as I had no idea it even existed.  See you around! Amalas 20:48, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing stubs on articles
Thank you for fixing stubs on articles Clerk of the Chapel and Oyster Feast. Davidbober 21:18, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/List of minor Biblical figures
I respect your position, but I disagree quite firmly. BD2412 T 22:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Religious fanaticism
First, I told Loom91 on the AFD page that Catholics weren't the only religious fanatics. Second, Loom91 reverted everyone else's changes, even keeping his spelling errors. Third, Loom91 took out many of the examples, even though they're obviously relevant to the subject, show the history of the subject, and broaden the definition of the concept. I would have kept some of his changes if I honestly thought that they were worth it, but it was just a statement of what is obvious. Wikipedia is here to teach people things they don't already know.--Primetime 18:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

res ipsa loquitur
I forgot you were a law student! &rArr;   SWAT Jester    Ready    Aim    Fire!  18:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * So erm, what does it mean? --  Rory  0  96  (block) 19:49, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * See here: Articles for deletion/Religious fanaticism for an explanation of my vote. - the.crazy.russian   τ   ç   ë  18:49, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I fully understand the concept of res ipsa loquitur, but I was actually not referring to a tort itself, rather the words used. I was saying, the word fanaticism speaks for itself as POV. Hence, res ipsa loquitur (but not a tort, just the latin meaning.) &rArr;    SWAT Jester    Ready    Aim    Fire!  20:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No worries, mate. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 20:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Kazxakhstan-geo-stub
Good work on Kazakhstan-geo-stub! I was hoping to have time to make one of the four proposed geo-stubs today (sadly I didn't have time in the end), but I see that one of them was done and populated. Ochen khorosho! :) Grutness...wha?  06:06, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Avdalen
Great job. Thanks a million. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ne problema. Actually, it was on my list of things to clean up someday, so your designation as needing a copyedit just moved it up. Spaceba - Williamborg 03:58, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

University stubs
OK - I'll go ahead and make them. I was waiting to see if there were any objections to my proposed scheme, since it was a bit different from the original proposal. Rescoping of the Korea one will need SFD, though, so I'll leave that one for now. Grutness...wha?  05:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Dualabs Article
Please view my response on my own talk page. Thanks for your input. -- Tompsci 16:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Shaul Wohl
dobre dyen tovarisch!

Shaul Whol is a real story... its my (great,great,great,great,great,great,great,great,great,) grandfather! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JJ211219 (talk • contribs).

Shaul Wohl
Hi, I just checked and everything in the Shaul Wohl article is already in Saul Wahl. I'm just going to turn it in to a redirect. agree?

Also the Saul Wahl article needs some work. I'l do some soon. Shlomke 21:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Yasher koach. Shlomke 23:27, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Igor Yurgens
The BBC thinks he's notable enough,  as does Business Week. I'm shocked (for rhetorical purposes) that you don't acknowledge him as notable. Monicasdude 21:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

The Advocate's personal attacks
Looks from User talk:The Advocate that he is leaving Wikipedia - but I've invited him to have a nice cup of tea and a sit down in the hope of resolving the problem without blocking. I do stand ready to block him if he engages in egregious personal attacks as he has previously done. David | Talk 23:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

satmar
with the rapid changes and current events goin on, I assume alot of articles will be changed by the respective followers of the two sons vying for succession.

anything to do? think this would hiut the main page of current events? how do I put it there? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JJ211219 (talk • contribs).

Saul Wohl
if I have a megallis yuchsin showing I am his grandson, how can he be fictional? he may or may not have been king of poland... but he is not fictional...! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JJ211219 (talk • contribs).

Saul Wohl
thanksgevaldik! 23:28, 24 April 2006 (UTC)!!!!

Marduk incident
Yeah, I got your first message, and there wasn't any need to threaten me with a block, as I'd already decided not to continue an insult war. People give me a lot of shit for doing what I think is right and trying to clean out the garbage. Most of these comments I ignore, but I'm only human. Brian G. Crawford 01:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Wonder Woman got nothing on me

 * Thanks for the comment. Just as a note, Danny Lilithborne is a character I created some time ago, so the stuff on my user page is largely in character.  I do have a Mistress named SpiderLady, but just Her.  Thanks again! :) Danny Lilithborne 02:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it. :) Yes, I'm Baha'i and submissive, and my name is Rick. But I sometimes talk in character, and Danny is part of a family which involves Lilith and eight sisters.  It's... umm... well, it gets adult.  Anyway, thanks for the message.  I like (good) attention.  ;) Danny Lilithborne 03:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

doglife
So you think I would have been better of with WP:AUTO then? [insert appropriately wry emoticon] Chick Bowen 02:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

anti semetic editing of satmar
can the oferning user be banned? they seem to be changing several articles with dsgusting anti semetic changes! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JJ211219 (talk • contribs).
 * trying.... - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 02:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Blocked for 24 hours; let me know or post at WP:AIV if it remains a problem. Chick Bowen 02:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello, saw it on recent changes. I would be more than happy to be of help if needed. Thanks.-- Dakota ~ 02:40, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It is on the watchlist. Quite horrid links. Shalom.-- Dakota ~ 02:53, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Re stubs
Looks like you, BL, and Valentinian cleared up all the geo-stub splits! Well done :) As to the taiwan-university-stub, since the template's now a redirect, I don't think it will do any harm to speedy it a little early. Grutness...wha?  02:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Heh - well BL Lacertae (who's also a kiwi) and I did go through looking for a few more to get it up to 60 :) Grutness...wha?  03:32, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

My Grandfather Existed!
how would you like it if someone on wiki decided your dedushka may not have existed? gevaldik! 03:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Granted, rewritten. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

like this better? if you insist he stay as not having existed.. although I reserve the right to dispute the existance of Moshe Rabbenu....

Saul Wahl (1541-1617) was a remarkable personage who according to legend, occupied the throne of Poland for a short time in 1586. Several prominent Jewish Families having genealogical lineage as being his descendants, but opinions differs as to whether or not he actually occupied the Polish throne, with some disputing if he actually existed. Some historians beleive this is apocryphal.

gevaldik! 03:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

AN/I
Your suggestion (complete with sample template text) was, for me, one of the four or five funniest things ever I've read here. I'd bust out a barnstar with which to commend your humor, but I'm certain that some will perceive your facetiousness as indifference/malignance and would find your being honored for it altogether gauche. You have my compliments, at the very least... Joe 06:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Watch, this will come up in my RfA in 2008 :) - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 06:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Since you've made yourself notable with your AN comments (notwithstanding that you're already notable in view of your having had your name mentioned in six newspaper articles), I've tried my hand at creating a bio for you, having made some well-supported inferences as to your Wikipedia future: User:Jahiegel/Sandbox. Joe 04:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

No problem
Always try to be. Thank you.-- Dakota ~ 15:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Well?
Which one do you mean.-- Dakota ~ 16:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you for bringing my attention to that. I apologized to the wrongly warned and fixed the article page. It was in the perception that I made error seeing it as accused abandonment. Thanks again.-- Dakota ~ 16:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Asian/Europen University stubs: Azerbaijan
Hello. I noticed you've been doing a good thorough job stubbing the universities in Europe/Asia (I worked on some articles in Lativia and Azerbaijan). However, I've noticed one problem that's certainly going to come up when a few Azeris see it: Azerbaijan is geographically considered a part of Europe, as per the Europe article (see the this wikipedia photo ). To be more accurate, Azerbaijan is a transcontinental nation, a good article worth glancing at (and I'd argue more "European" in geography than their Turkish cousins). I know from my interactions with the Azeri community that they consider themselves a part of geographic Europe. I worry that this may end up as some kind of very passionate (and less logical) debate when one of them catches on. What do you think? Would you care if I went through and recategorized the Azeri universities as European (although I could probably keep Nakhichevan State as a Asian university. -- Bobak 17:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * So wait... I got a little confused by the two responses, do you want me to start going through an resorting as European (wouldn't be a problem)? -- Bobak 17:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * FDA law (Medical device regulation), in-house for a small start-up company. I also dabble in my company's non-patent IP, specifically copyrights and trademarks.  Whenever I need a break I eyeball my watchlist, best of luck on your journey to lawyerdom. -- Bobak 17:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem, I would've made the same mistake if I didn't live with one. The first time I heard it, it threw me for a loop. I'm Persian and our Azeris don't consider themselves European.  I guess the Russian Czars and Persian Shahs should've flipped a coin on who got to keep the group.  Hah, kidding. -- Bobak 21:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC)