User talk:Crzycheetah/Archive 4

Denver Broncos season FLC
I addressed your comment as best I could a while ago but yo've not replied. Buc (talk) 17:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

nom is likly to fail in the next 24 hours if nothing major happens. Buc (talk) 17:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Do you have anymore feedback to give on the list before I renominate it? Buc (talk) 17:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Arkansas Razorbacks in the NFL Draft
I have completed the reasoning for your opposition by moving the table to earliest to latest chronological order. Reorion (talk) 18:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/New Orleans Hornets draft history
I was wondering if you want to co-nominating with me for the article, New Orleans Hornets draft history. If you do, just erase maybe on the article's featured list candidate page. Annoyomous 24  02:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

NBA draft histories references
I was wondering how do you get the references that I think are impossible to find? For example, The Chris Webber trade on Orlando Magic draft history. Annoyomous 24  23:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:"27 Missing Kisses"
Hello Crzycheetah. Done it. Best regards, --KoberTalk 04:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Edward P. Carville.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Edward P. Carville.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ЭLСОВВОLД talk 18:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)  -- ЭLСОВВОLД  talk 18:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Arcade Fire awards
If you get a chance could you take another look at the list, and perhaps offer a Support or Oppose? Cheers! Gary King ( talk ) 00:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Gary King ( talk ) 01:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Crzycheetah 01:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Gary King ( talk ) 02:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/WWE No Way Out
..I responded to your comments, thanks! ;)-- S R X  19:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I responded again.-- S R X  00:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

No barnstar...
...just thanks. Keep up the good work with your reviews. I appreciate it and I'm sure the rest of the FL community do too. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:43, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Phoenix Suns head coaches
I was wondering if you want to review this featured list candidate. If you do, please just click on the subtitle. K. Annoyomous 24  01:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Virginia Tech Hokies Football Seasons FLC
Thanks for the helpful review! It's always nice to get a substantive critique, and I think I've addressed your concerns. Feel free to take another look, and if there are places where you think the article needs another citation for something that isn't covered in the list itself, throw down a fact tag and I'll replace it with a cite when I get a chance. Thanks again for taking the time to review it. If you ever need a reviewer yourself, drop me a note and I'll be happy to help. JKBrooks85 (talk) 03:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Concern
Thanks for your concern. At the moment we have five or six lists a day being nominated. We have a few contributors (you are a major one) who offer excellent criticism on each list. Very few contributors !vote. While I'm keen to avoid promoting lists which aren't ready, the Hokies list (for example) had sufficient support for promotion, in my opinion. If not the case then I'm sure I'll be reminded of it very swiftly. A 20-list backlog is something which we must avoid and because the ten-day minimum stay has been reinforced, backlogs will become inevitable with 5/6 lists being added every day. You and Scorpion have similar opinions in this regard, and I understand that. I'll reconsider my position as FL director. Thanks for your note. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Secondly, I take my reviews of these lists very seriously and would not wish to promote something I'm not happy with. After all, that's the point of me & Scorpion0422 being directors.  Otherwise, it just goes back to the way it was months and months ago when average lists (yes, including some of my own for sure) made it through and we had a giant backlog which stopped people nominating and reviewing (I think there were three or four regular reviewers back then).  Ultimately the directors have the responsibility of deciding when promotion is appropriate.  You may note that I still thoroughly review virtually every candidate, so I'm not promoting lists for the hell of it. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You think citation problems are being overlooked? Check out Mark Lanegan discography (the FLC and my archives).  And Queens of the Stone Age discography.  I think I'm doing more than anyone else in areas I'm not familiar with to check citations.  With a magnifying glass.  Anyway, point made.  I'll do my best to avoid premature promotion, but I will end up failing/archiving lists quickly because FLC should not be a repository for PR wannabes. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I think one problem we have right now is a large number of non-native English speakers (US contributors exempted of course!) and when they nom several lists of the same nature, it's a real challenge to balance AGF with pragmatism. Anyway, I take your point, I'll look more seriously at the quick-fail and try to be more lenient for those lists a day or two overdue.  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Annoyomous24's FLCs
I was wondering if you want to review my featured list nomination for List of Vancouver Canucks head coaches. Thanks if you do! –.– K. Annoyomous  24  23:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I was wondering if you can change NBA All-Star Game MVP Award to NBA All-Star Game Most Valuable Player Award because it is more accurate and people who barely know about the article will know what MVP means. –.– K. Annoyomous  24  02:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I think I've done all your comments. Please let me know what I'm doing wrong. -- K. Annoyomous  24  07:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Can you please Support this featured list nomination for Minnesota Timberwolves draft history or add more comments as this nomination has been on for over 10 days. -- K. Annoyomous  24  01:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Please have another look at List of Toronto Blue Jays managers. I fixed your concerns on Annoyomous24's behalf and explained the issues which you raised. There should be no further reasons to oppose. If you have further questions, you can read my reviews or ask me at my talk page. Thanks. KV5  •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  02:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Your concerns are addressed for the Minnesota Timberwolves draft history FLC. -- K. Annoyomous  24  GO LAKERS! 04:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Recent promotions
Since you've been concerned with my recent judgements at WP:FLC, I've opened a thread at WT:FLC to allow the community to discuss it. I'd like for you to contribute. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Major League Baseball Rookie of the Year Award
Hi Czych. Your comments at the FLC for the above list are still outstanding and I think they're valuable enough to prevent promotion. However, Milks Favorite Cookie has gone AWOL since 23 July after a failed RFA. Do you think you'd be prepared to implement your own suggestions or find someone who would, e.g. maclean? The Rambling Man (talk) 07:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, if you could add any concluding comments to 2000 Summer Olympics medal count, that'd be very useful indeed. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Broncos seasons
Do you have anymore feedback to give on the list before I renominate it? Buc (talk) 16:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Blue Jays
Hi Czych. I've attempted to remedy the objections you have against the Blue Jays list. I've linked all seasons and coach names, and when sorting by #, the repeated tenures appear together now which I think seems logical, but if you disagree then I'll happily move it back out - if you make it numeric order then it'll sort identically to term which would imply that the # col should be unsortable. If you could have one last look at it and decide if you're happy to support, that'd be great. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to post this message on the nomination page because I don't think this issue deserves revocation of my support; however, I do want to make sure that you are familiar with this paragraph from WP:LINK:

Do not make too many links. An article may be overlinked if any of the following is true:… (deletion mine) A link for any single term is excessively repeated in the same article, as in the example of overlinking that follows: "Excessive" typically means more than once for the same term in an article. The purpose of links is to direct the reader to a new spot at a point where the reader is most likely to take a temporary detour due to a need for more information; this is usually on the first occurrence of the term, although the subsequent linking of an important item distant from its previous occurrence in an article may occasionally be appropriate in a table or in a subsection to which readers may jump directly, either within the article or via a section-link from another article. KV5 •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  12:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * KV5, on a sortable table, for the linking to be guaranteed to be "usually on the first occurrence of the term", all instances should be linked. In worst case scenarios, long, chronological, sortable tables could sort in reverse chronlogical order and your one link (which was at the top) is now no longer visible.  That's why sortable tables link, link, link. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Fancy adding some sanity to the ongoing discussion there? I'd appreciate it. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: Sister cities of Yerevan
Hey Crzycheetah, for Paris I found it on Paris' website and for Rostov-on-Don from here. Hope this helped. - Fedayee (talk) 06:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The more the merrier, thanks for the link my friend! - Fedayee (talk) 05:08, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Los Angeles Lakers Newsletter for August 3, 2008
-- K. Annoyomous  24  GO LAKERS! Please reply on my talk page. Thanks. 00:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Philadelphia Phillies managers
Now that the discussion has closed, I will be trying to make fixes to the article in a push for a second nomination. However, I would still appreciate some clarification on one point. As I understand your first unresolved point, you stated that sentences simply cannot start with "Of...". I beg to differ on this issue. The Bedford Handbook, a reputable and well-respected writing style guide, states that "a complex sentence is composed of one independent clause with one or more subordinate clauses." Using "of" to start an initial prepositional phrase, otherwise known as an adverb subordinate clause, is grammatically correct, and an example is given in the book ("If you scatter thorns, don't go barefoot."). It is also written in the same book that "to give unequal emphasis to two or more ideas, [one should] express the major idea in an independent clause and place any minor ideas in subordinate clauses or phrases." I will not presume to make assumptions about your reasoning; however, I would like to understand your point of view on this issue. KV5 •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  16:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * What I wrote adheres exactly to the rules for subordinate clauses. The word "manager" may seem repetitive, but it was added in response to an earlier review because the numbers were previously next to each other. KV5  •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  18:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of municipalities of the Brussels-Capital Region
Thanks for the review! I've addressed all of your concerns except one which I do not understand. Could you elaborate? Malinaccier (talk) 01:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ha, thanks! I've been trying to figure it out, and then once I did I edit conflicted with you.  Thanks again, Malinaccier (talk) 01:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright, I've finished the references. Malinaccier (talk) 01:30, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I believe I've adressed your final concern! Malinaccier (talk) 22:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Broncos seasons
Do you have anymore feedback to give on the list before I renominate it? BUC (talk) 11:06, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/National Basketball Association awards
I was wondering if you can review this FLC. Thanks! -- K. Annoyomous  24  GO LAKERS! Please reply on my talk page. Thanks. 11:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)}}

Featured list candidates/NBA All-Star Game Most Valuable Player Award
-- K. Annoyomous  24  GO LAKERS! Please reply on my talk page. Thanks. 09:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Currently, KV5 is asking you a question on this FLC. May you please reply ASAP. Thanks. -- K. Annoyomous  24  GO LAKERS! Please reply on my talk page. Thanks. 05:07, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I am wondering if you can review this FLC again. Thanks.— Chris!  c t 17:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I finish your request. So let me know what you think. Thanks.— Chris!  c t 01:45, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

FLC
Times 2! KV5 •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  16:54, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/National Basketball Association awards

 * I am wondering if you can review this FLC again. Thanks.— Chris!  c t 21:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Seattle Mariners Opening Day starting pitchers
I have responded to your comments on this FLC. Thank you -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 19:40, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I have replied to your additional comments -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 21:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I have replied to your additional comments. -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 07:35, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

FLRC
Hello, there may be a position open for another FLRC delegate, and I was wondering if you were at all interested in the position. You can find out more here. Thanks, Scorpion0422 20:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/New York Giants seasons
I've responded to all of your comments now. Please let me know if there are any other improvements you have in mind.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 02:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Maryland hurricanes (1950–1979)/archive2
Hi CrzyCheetah. I was just wondering if your oppose still stands. The nom is two weeks old and I'd like to close it one way or the other. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 07:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

A new FL contest
Wikipedia's epic FL directors Matthewedwards and Scorpion0422 have decided to try another FL contest as a follow up to the one held last June. As you entered the first contest, you may be interested in taking a look at the new one, which will have different rules. Although they are still being fiddled with, three FLs in different topics will be required this time around. For more information, see here. A start date has not yet been determined, but it will likely begin some time within the next week or so. Thanks for the time, Scorpion0422 15:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Chicago Bulls seasons
Could you look at this FLC? Your concerns have been addressed, Thanks — Chris!  c t 22:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

FLC
Hello, the FLCon is currently running and unfortunately part of the problem with it is that most of our current regular reviewers are entrants. I would hate for people to lose in the contest solely because of a lack of reviewers, so could you please take a look at some of the following FLCs if you have time?

Thanks for your time, Scorpion0422 14:20, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * List of Honorary Fellows of Jesus College, Oxford
 * List of acquisitions by Hewlett-Packard
 * List of universities in Nova Scotia
 * List of Governors of Arizona
 * List of St. Louis Rams head coaches
 * List of Vancouver SkyTrain stations
 * List of Soul Eater chapters

Featured list candidates/List of Maryland hurricanes (1950–1979)/archive3
I responded to your oppose. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  15:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Questionnaire
As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:13 Movie.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:13 Movie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 12:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

New FL criteria discussion: Final phase
Hello, I think we've hammered out a good revised Featured List criteria here. If this passes, there will be quite a few FLs (my estimate is somewhere between 50 and 75) that could soon be delisted just because of 3b. With that in mind, I'd like to get comments and opinions from all FLC regulars and everyone else who has participated in the discussion before it's implemented. Thanks, Scorpion 0422  17:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/2008 NBA Draft/archive1
Could you look at this FLC? Your concerns have been addressed, Thanks— Chris!  c t 18:42, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by No Country for Old Men
that doesn't change the fact that tables in wikipedia use wikitable - Please show me that policy that requires it. WP:ACTOR uses a different style of table in its recommendation for filmographies. WP:FILM has not disallowed it in the awards lists that have been created. If you want to bring up the article for delisting, feel free, but there is no policy that I have found requires plain wikitable be used and if you had an issue with the table being used, then you should have brought that up in January. It passed FL using the table, it was discussed and passed with it. Does WP:BRD mean nothing to you or do you usually just revert back without discussing it? You removed absolutely all color in the table heading with change you made, leaving it plain and unattractive. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You actually weigh in at FLC with reasoning like "it is stupid"? That's not quite civil. There is nothing in the criteria for FLs that mandate the use of a specific table style either. Essentially, you don't like it and find it unattractive, that's subjective as well. Unless there is policy or criteria that mandates the table you put in, there is no valid reason that it use it. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It makes the border around the table appear darker, thus more congruent, with the dividing lines between each type of award in the table. I had a similar discussion at one point about how a table viewed on someone else's computer. Apparently it doesn't show a difference with some browsers but does so with others. What browser do you use? Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I use Firefox. IE started crashing my computer a year or so ago and I've dumped it completely. I know a lot of tables look much differently depending on the browser. Myself, I think they look better on Firefox, but I'm sure others see it as the opposite. I have to say it takes a lot more insertion into the wikitable to get the color into the titles line of the table - an entry for each column vs. one entry at the line break about the titles! Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * That would be an issue if the colors were problematic for those with color-blindness, sure. I ran my colors through the tools to check for it, and it posed no problems. Meanwhile, there is the Golden Globe Award for Best Original Score FL. Although I know you supported the passing in 2007, those colors actually physically hurt my eyes. I have a vision disability (not related to color) and some combinations overwhelm them. That's a case where I think the color isn't necessary, the winners are already bolded. Personal preferences I suppose. Wildhartlivie (talk) 07:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:2003 NBA All-Star Game.png)
 Thanks for uploading File:2003 NBA All-Star Game.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 20:33, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Basketball Association
JustSomeRandomGuy32 has removed all the nationality notes and the Nationality column on all NBA awards articles, and I'm sure you want the nationalities to stay on the articles. I hope you could comment on WT:NBA, and hope that Chrishomingtang will come back ASAP from his exams. --  SRE.K.A.L. | L.A.K.ERS ]] call me Keith 07:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * If you're calling JustSomeRandomGuy32's edits nonsense, then shouldn't you be able to give suggestions or why the nationality should be on the articles at WT:NBA? It would be great if you could comment, thanks. --  SRE.K.A.L. | L.A.K.ERS ]] call me Keith 04:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

NBA Defensive Player of the Year
In regards to this edit and the edit war on the page, I've started a thread on the talk page. Let's discuss the matter there, please. Thanks in advance. Dayewalker (talk) 04:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You have now crossed the 3RR threshold on this article, and are officially edit warring. Please come to the talk page to discuss. Dayewalker (talk) 06:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

FLC comment
Thank you for commenting in the WP:FLC for 29th Golden Raspberry Awards. I have addressed your comments, at Featured list candidates/29th Golden Raspberry Awards/archive1. Cirt (talk) 20:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/1900 Summer Olympics medal table/archive2
Made a sort of compromise proposal about the 3b issues. Geraldk (talk) 20:32, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in San Diego/archive1
I believe I have addressed your concerns that you raised. Let me know if you need me to fix them further or if you notice anything else. Thanks for taking the time to review the long list. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your support and helpful comments. Still can't believe I missed that one in the lead! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

FLRC
Hey. Thanks for your note. I was a little surprised to see that I'd been nominated and subsequently elected FLRC director, particularly with my recent massive absence and then the on-going Arbcom in which I am likely to be berated for not pursuing correct dispute resolution methods. I have to admit that my real-life commitments combined with a heap of chagrin at the utter debacle in the date delinking Arbcom which will see us lose several good editors forever has forced me to reconsider my wiki-commitment. I never ever forwent my commitments to FLC as a director, nor did I underestimate my responsibilities as a bureaucrat, but since it's apparent that editors who have contributed massively to this project, free of charge, can be judged, sentenced and executed, leaving the project with a serious net loss, I'm thinking hard about all my commitments. Post-Arbcom "decision" delivery (theoretically end of May, but the case has been on-going for some five or so months...), I'll re-evaluate and let the community know. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)