User talk:Cs-wolves/Archive 21

Your GA nomination of 2012 Tour de France, Prologue to Stage 10
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2012 Tour de France, Prologue to Stage 10 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 14:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

The article 2012 Tour de France, Prologue to Stage 10 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2012 Tour de France, Prologue to Stage 10 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 22:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2012 Tour de France, Stage 11 to Stage 20
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2012 Tour de France, Stage 11 to Stage 20 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 14:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

The article 2012 Tour de France, Stage 11 to Stage 20 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2012 Tour de France, Stage 11 to Stage 20 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

2012 Tour
Good good. I think I'll have a go at getting the main one to FA. Will take a while though, with a peer review first. BaldBoris 19:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Not sure I'm going to be doing that. Three is just about enough for me. Pre-internet Tours take a lot more research. I still think you should consider nominating some of your 2012/13 races. Definitely 2012 Tour of Britain. BaldBoris 19:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 22 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Marco Andretti page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=691889535 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F691889535%7CMarco Andretti%5D%5D Ask for help])

NASCAR standards proposal
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2015_NASCAR_Sprint_Cup_Series. Thanks. –  Nascar1996  ( talk • cont ) 01:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi
If you want to, please take a look at the article about Lisa Aschan that I have created. Any help is appreciated. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 15:46, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

2015–16 Top 14 season
Hi mate, I have seen that you are updating the page of the Top 14 (2015-16 Season), the article has a gross error, since literally says: "It trialled a new system in 2007–08 explicitly designed to prevent a losing team from earning more than one bonus point in a match"..."1 bonus point for winning while scoring at least 3 more tries than the opponent"...Maybe it's weird to happen, but nothing in the Top 14 rules prevents that the loser can win the 3 tries bonus:

3) Principes de classement, de qualification et d’opposition

Article 330

3.2. Points "terrain" et points de bonus :

b) Des points de bonus sont attribués en phase régulière du Championnat de France de 1ère et 2ème division selon les principes suivants : - 1 point de bonus pour une équipe ayant marqué au moins 3 essais de plus que son adversaire lors d’une même rencontre

In english: 1 bonus point for a team having scored at least three more tries than his opponent at the same match.

http://www.lnr.fr/sites/default/files/statuts_et_reglements_lnr_2015-2016_def.pdf

Nowhere it specifies that the loser can not win 2 bonus points in a match, and the same for the word "winning", which is not mentioned anywhere in the rules of the LNR. The rules say a team having, not winning. It's weird but can happen. CheersHernánRFC (talk) 20:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hold on Now, Youngster


The article Hold on Now, Youngster has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not an official release, lacks references and any indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Karst (talk) 11:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of My Year in Lists


The article My Year in Lists has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, fails WP:MUSIC and no indication of any notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Karst (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hold On Now, Youngster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Hold On Now, Youngster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Women's World Tour
Hey, how does grouping the two classifications no aid accessibility? XyZAn (talk) 17:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arthur Sissis


The article Arthur Sissis has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non notable biography

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 22:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

heh
This is why the WP:RU project is dead, we are not evolving at all since 2006.. Whenever we come up with new ideas, one idiot will always shoot it down....Most real contributors have left because of it, now we are left with basically no one that gives a crap....7's rugby is now an olympic sport and heck, we don't even have a "real" rugby player infobox, we are still using a fucking soccer infobox...i'm glad I left this shitty project years ago..you should too..why do i even bother trying new things..-- Stemoc 21:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your recent cycling template history-merge requests

 * In your recent wave of cycling-related template history-merge requests (see Special:Contributions/Cs-wolves) :
 * In every case so far where you asked for Template:A to be history-merged into Template:B, Template:B had no edits except redirects, and I had to make a plain page-move.
 * Putting a "please-merge" line into a template results in Category:Candidates for history merging also including every page that transcludes that template, although those pages do not need history-merging, swamping genuine needs to history-merge other (non-cycling-related) pages, and I must wait a long time for Wikipedia to clear its buffers. Please when will you have finished wanting templates to be history-merged? (If you answer here, please insert in your answer.) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2013 Paris–Nice
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2013 Paris–Nice you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

The article 2013 Paris–Nice you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2013 Paris–Nice for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

The article 2013 Paris–Nice you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2013 Paris–Nice for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Dates
Hi, a question regarding this edit. Why remove startdate template? Qed237&#160;(talk) 23:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

The 10,000 Challenge
Hi, at The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)