User talk:Csboger

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ► 03:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:BEASTER.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BEASTER.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 16:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BEASTER the easter animation concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BEASTER the easter animation, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission BEASTER the easter animation


Hello Csboger. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled BEASTER the easter animation.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Please be more careful with your edits.
Hello, I'm Shattered Gnome. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Christina Crawford because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please also read Wikipedia in brief for more information on appropriate changes to articles. — Shattered Gnome (talk) 00:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

List of paraphilias
Stop adding "toonophilia." There is no such thing. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

At least in the case of a medical diagnosis, there is no such thing. And the List of paraphilias article should be supported by scholarly sources, preferably medical sources. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Cassandra Crossing, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Original research
Please don't add your own personal analysis or opinions to Wikipedia articles. Claims that a film was a "box office disappointment" or was "lambasted by critics" require a source. Otherwise, it is original research, which is forbidden by Wikipedia policy. 02:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Adding ratings
Please don't add ratings to the opening sentence of film articles. You will notice that these have all been reverted, yet you continue to add them to new articles. It really doesn't add anything and ratings are different in different countries, so they are confusing and disruptive. NEDOCHAN (talk) 09:01, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Changing genre of films without discussion
Hi Csboger. It is apparent that you often change the genre of films without discussion. It is normal to discuss such changes on article talk pages. In one example, here you did this in spite of a long, detailed discussion having taken place, in which you played no part, and, perhaps more oddly, when there was an explicit instruction from other editors not to do so. Please do not make changes such as these without discussion. Your editing is quite troublesome, I'm afraid.NEDOCHAN (talk) 15:14, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Genre edits
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you.NEDOCHAN (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mommie Dearest (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:52, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Desert Rose (Sting song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Desert_Rose_%28Sting_song%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Desert_Rose_%28Sting_song%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

July 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:05, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Ahoy!
Howdy hello! Hope you're doing well. I'd like to make a personal note about a few things. Above you can see I mentioned edit summaries, which I highly recommend you use. I also see you haven't been using sources very well, you recently made this edit, but you didn't cite any sources! Wikipedia is built on reliable sources, and we expect every substantial edit to be backed up by one. As a last note, please make sure to communicate with folks when they have issues, either on this talk page, their talk page, or the talk page of the article in question. Smooth sailing, CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

May 2021
Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Psycho (1960 film), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

August 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to I Know What You Did Last Summer, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:45, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)