User talk:Cseper

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 18:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Edits
The fact that you use the pronoun 'we' gives me pause, as does the fact -- which I did not notice earlier -- that you yourself appear to be one of the sources listed in the 'References' section.

May I ask what your direct connection with the subject is, and why you use 'we' when describing your work? --CalendarWatcher (talk) 19:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid I'm even more confused. If 'We' refers to The Plain Dealer staff, you seem to be suggesting some sort of involvement by your newspaper. Surely that can't be right? --CalendarWatcher (talk) 21:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Meddistrict red-588x294.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Meddistrict red-588x294.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 13:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Medical District (Cleveland)


The article Medical District (Cleveland) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article references a neologism that was created by the author.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avogadro 18:08, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Medical District (Cleveland)
I have nominated Medical District (Cleveland), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Medical District (Cleveland). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Eureka Lott 20:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)