User talk:Cshubho

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Twenty Years 01:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 05:39, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. In addition, you may wish to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia guidelines on promoting personal opinions in article space. Rivertorch (talk) 18:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

August 2011
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Catholic sex abuse cases. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Bilby (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Last warning for spamming your blog
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:47, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

It is NOT spamming or increasing web traffic as you have hastily inferred from whatever bastion of power you hold. I EARN nothing from my blog; but then YOU add external links which PROVE that secular Lectio Divina are possible. I think you are blocking me because of your bigotry. Thanks, for nothing. ( I am a tenured Assistant professor trained in a catholic seminary so I have the Right to add that link not because it is mine but because it is contrarian to your narrow views and shallow reading)--Cshubho (talk) 16:22, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If you re-add the link (or any further external research), you'll quickly discover that I have to power to block your account. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

'''Yah I got it that you WIELD POWER and that is why fools like you have to be exposed in other forums. That is the whole point --- you are our NEW Masters. God knows that you sit in the US and with your limited knowledge and racist ideologies; even if you are a person of color; you have POWER, which we Indians have not; since we are supposed to do your donkey work.''' --Cshubho (talk) 04:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Adding unsourced content
Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:45, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Who decides what should be cited and what not? I have not plagiarized anything and am conversant with MLA, APA, Chicago Turabian etc. citations. I am surprised that whoever you are have the arrogance to decide for the world at large what ought to be cited and what not! I think you miss the point entirely: for instance, you cannot cite the praxis of a religion. Whatever you cite is not up to date. I think you ought to have asked me about removing my so called uncited material before you did so. You seem to be a know-all kind of person unworthy of academic freedom. I am neither a spammer; nor less serious than you about cleaning up Wikipedia but unlike you I know what should be cited and what not. So in short, you come out to me as a pseudo-intellectual. May be you will demand a citation for a pastry. I am offended by your hegemonic stance and holier than thou attitude. And keep in mind, when I am the originator of the idea; I am the citation and unlike you I freely give the rights to the public not to some methodology fixated person like you. This is not an ad hominem attack; you have persistently attacked me ad hominem; so I do so. Please cite ad hominem since I don't think you know the meaning of the term. LOL.--Cshubho (talk) 16:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Also keep in mind that your prowling the internet does not translate to your domain expertise; you may just be one of those people who tend to know everything everywhere. The celebrity status does not excuse your arrogance.

June 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Romanticism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 16:58, 24 June 2013 (UTC)