User talk:Cspar

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CSS Publishing Company logo.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:CSS Publishing Company logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 21:18, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

CSS Publishing Company
Hello, and welcome. I removed content in this edit because it appears to have been copy pasted from http://csspubtrade.com/c.php?contentID=1

Please rewrite it in your own words. Many thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:33, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Also, please find more references. I fear the article may be nominated for deletion because it doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

CSS Publishing Company - Removal of notability tag
Please do not remove notability tags from articles without having resolved the issue --nonsense ferret  18:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CSS Publishing Company


The article CSS Publishing Company has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable publishing company who whack out Christian publications. Nothing wrong with that but I worked in print industry for many years and just because you have a tiny company churning out books does not make them notable. All the redirects and so on lead back to hear so I think this is kinda going around the houses we need proper RS. Number of employees 11-50 I have worked for many companies like that and enjoyed doing so. Nevertheless they are not notable by WP standards

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Si Trew (talk) 11:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of CSS Publishing Company for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CSS Publishing Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CSS Publishing Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Si Trew (talk) 06:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CSS Publishing logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:CSS Publishing logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)