User talk:Cstanton19/Women photographers

I took a look at the existing article as well as your revisions and was impressed with the diversity of the present information. The article includes a wide range of styles of photography that have evolved over time. It even includes individual categories for lesbian and African-American artist which was great to see. From looking at your sandbox I think it would be interesting to expand on the male dominance and historical misogyny in the industry. Some more contemporary updates of artists specifically those who take a feminist stance with their subjectivity could also be good additions (which you seem to already have started thinking about). So far the main article is written in a very neutral tone with a light on marginalized women which is great. I am interested to see your further contributions considering the article is already fairly well developed. Sidney Gordon (talk) 04:41, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Ive reviewed your sandbox and the article “women photographers”. It is a well developed article with a large amount of sub headlines covering different aspects of women in photography. I understand that you are in the early stages of addition and am wondering what it is you will adding. You referenced Claude Cajun, will you be adding more information on this artist? Is there a deep importance to this artist? Have they contributed greatly to women in photography? It is great to add photographers of today. As our history is of great importance it is just as important to reference the working people of today. As I mentioned earlier, when making additions I would think about why these are important. I agree with Sidney Gordon that adding new information on perhaps “historical misogyny in the industry” or other information that is current to today would be of great value. Though they are red zones for information, done well, would be a great contribution. Look forward to reading your additions to photography of women. SarahJeanDixon (talk) 03:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)