User talk:Cstella23

Welcome!

 * Welcome to the Electronic music WikiProject and an overdue welcome to Wikipedia. If you have any questions or need any help with anything feel free to ask.  Have a good one!  Wickethewok 00:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Chris Fortier

 * Heya, I've made some upgrades to this article if you wanna check it out. Cheers!  Wickethewok 15:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Kevin Smith WikiProject
Thank you for volunteering for the yet-to-be-made Kevin Smith WikiProject! If you feel you are an expert in the area of a certain movie, person, or topic that concerns Mr. Smith, or you feel you are a Wikipedia formatting and prettiness expert, please post so on the proposal section. Thank you, and snooch to the nooch! DodgerOfZion 16:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Melbourne, et al Adjacent to
I like something to locate Melbourne (and other places) in relation to perhaps known places. The arrows with boldface seemed a bit strident. Kind of like caps which people call "shouting." Could this be discussed a bit? I have to admit, it's hard nowdays to get up a Wikipedia discussion about anything that national headlines aren't already screaming about. Student7 14:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I think it's great to have under geography. Arrows seem okay to me. I would prefer to see boldface removed. Just my thought. I'll post this under Melbourne, as well. Student7 16:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I assure you, we have a page open! (KSWP)
The Kevin Smith/View Askew Wikiproject has a temporary home! Post your suggestions and topics for discussion, as well as any articles in need of attention there!

Go here to post your input! Thanks for volunteering! --DodgerOfZion 04:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

We're live!
The Wikiproject View Askew is officially online and working! Go here! DodgerOfZion

clarification
You recently reverted an edit of mine on View Askewniverse with reasoning that it is not part of the official Universe. Although this is true, neither is Jersey Girl, or Scream 3. These are listed as part of the Universe, whereas my entry was placed correctly as a sidenote to Mallrats. What gives? aliasd·U·T 13:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * you are right, they should go OR there should be an out of universe section. That said, Vulgar also includes a number of actors from the view askew films and is not noted.  Hope that helps, or at least makes some sense.

Cstella23 14:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, I vote for the out of universe section, in the interests of creating a more interesting article. Cheers for the heads up on Vulgar. I haven't seen it. aliasd·U·T 14:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Just something to for you to pick at: Vulgar mentioned Walt Flanagan's dog in the background. Does that NOT make it part of the Askewniverse, or was the man just messing with us? DodgerOfZion

Mae Day: The Crumbling of a Documentary
A template has been added to the article Mae Day: The Crumbling of a Documentary, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. B. Wolterding 15:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Chris Fortier - Press 5.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chris Fortier - Press 5.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 03:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music as a participant of WP:WikiProject Electronic music. - The   Magnificentist  13:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)