User talk:Cstuarthardwick

"Suppositional fiction"?
Believe it or not, I'm not trying to give you a hard time. I just removed the citations you gave, because they consisted of an entire book, with no page specified; a podcast; and a blog. Footnotes here should meet the same standards you would expect from a Ph.D. thesis: author, title, page numbers, etc.; and should come only from reliable sources, not from blogs and podcasts. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Now that's what I was seeking; thanks! Notice the changes I made for consistency of format. (I cannot forbear from observing that most writing of this kind of academic work about fiction [with some honorable exceptions] is done by people who've never successfully sold a piece of fiction to a professionally paying market in their entire lives.) -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=721173383 your edit] to Handedness may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * This section should be removed or rewritten so say some researchers have claimed the correlation.
 * correlation. Even the sources cited by the section include expert testimony contesting this claim.