User talk:CthulhuAltDelete

January 2021
Hello, I'm Biglittlehugesmall65. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Brendan Dassey have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Biglittlehugesmall65 (talk) 13:17, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Why? CthulhuAltDelete (talk) 13:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

It is constructive to have this article held accountable for the facts of the case CthulhuAltDelete (talk) 13:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Brendan Dassey. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. - pivotman319 (📫) 13:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Not vandalism if it is accurate look at the article it says he was coerced and wrongfully convicted. Why are you so apposed to the truth CthulhuAltDelete (talk) 13:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for evading a previous block and edit warring, as you did at Brendan Dassey. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

🤣😅 you guys are liars and jokers. I hope you get wrongfully convicted of murder just like Brendan CthulhuAltDelete (talk) 13:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , I understand your frustration that you feel the articles are inaccurate. Unfortunately, just because you feel strongly that they were both "wrongfully convicted", there are no sources that support that, otherwise they would no longer be in prison. I suggest you read up on both Verifiability and Reliable sources. If you continue to try and make these changes, you will just end up blocked indefinitely for being disruptive. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

There is evidence to support the fact the confession was coerced... it says it in Brendan's article. By wiki staying complicit in the wrongfully conviction despite the evidence then you will not be loomed on favorably by future generations... wiki should hold the responsible parties accountable, not continue to maintain status quo by spreading propaganda and lies CthulhuAltDelete (talk) 04:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * This is what we call "righting great wrongs". It's sometimes very frustrating, but you can't use Wikipedia to effect change.  You have to wait until the change happens, and then you can reflect the change on Wikipedia.  Also, if other editors disagree with your edits, instead of repeatedly reinstating them, you have to discuss the issue with them on the article's talk page.  Once a consensus forms, the article can be updated accordingly.  If you edit war over this, you'll just be blocked again.  Please take a look at Help:Getting started to see some guides to editing Wikipedia.  You can also get help at the Teahouse, our forum for new users. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the words of encouragement and directions to help contribute more effectively.

I have done a bunch of editing on wiki anonymously. Fixed bill mummy's birthday, added singing credit to Felicia day's wiki... this is the first time I had to make an account and gotten into a editing war over a known public outcry that is published all over mainstream news and on the lips, hearts, and minds of all wrongfully convicted. There are many facts that are not mentioned in this article... have any of you read the court papers? Transcripts? What the confession was? I think you guys know the right thing to do but instead you will just remain a follower and enabler of the abusers.

Which means you are complicit in the slave trade.

Thank you again, I will not try to "Right great wrongs" just point out the hypocrisy of it all. The undone edits I put in are widely accepted as fact by more humans than not. The only reason Bredon is still in jail is a small number of extremely corrupt justices. Everyone knows the confession was coerced and the only reason either got convicted was on the public demonization and the coerced confession. I think if you educated yourselves on the article at hand we could have a better discussion and hopefully come to a conclusion that represents all the facts. CthulhuAltDelete (talk) 15:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep in mind this is an encyclopedia that attempts to remain neutral and reflects what the sources say. This isn't a place to advocate for a position.
 * However, you are more than welcome to add more content to the article highlighting the issues you mention above. Of course, this is assuming that this not your own original research, you provide reliable sources that back this up and, and you have consensus to do so (also see WP:BRD as you don't need to necessarily use the talk page for every edit). This could be as simple as adding more info to a current section like "Public response and appeals" as is, a subsection or it, or a new section entirely. I personally don't care, but you can't change the article to say he's been "wrongfully convicted" when he's still sitting in prison. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * However, you are more than welcome to add more content to the article highlighting the issues you mention above. Of course, this is assuming that this not your own original research, you provide reliable sources that back this up and, and you have consensus to do so (also see WP:BRD as you don't need to necessarily use the talk page for every edit). This could be as simple as adding more info to a current section like "Public response and appeals" as is, a subsection or it, or a new section entirely. I personally don't care, but you can't change the article to say he's been "wrongfully convicted" when he's still sitting in prison. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)