User talk:Ctmuva2000

Welcome!
Hello, Ctmuva2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Catherine the Great have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Haploidavey (talk) 22:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC

Hello! Sorry to revert your addition. Though it seemed reasonable enough to me, such a claim requires the support of a reliable scholarly source. If the claim is only supported by a very small or fringe minority, it probably shouldn't be included. You're very welcome to bring the matter up on the article talk-page, but again, be prepared to cite reliable sources in support of your argument. Best wishes, Haploidavey (talk) 22:55, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Citing sources
Hi again, and thanks for the note. Please use a standard Wikipedia format for your citations. As well as author and title, you must include the publisher, year of publication and the page number - that's crucial: I'll give an example below- if you open the page for editing, you'll see the wiki-markup required for italics etc.

We don't usually give authors and publications within text: we place them within reftags, thus You don't need to add reflist markup to the article itself, of course.

Please note that according to the article text, most sources doubt Catherine's involvement in the assassination, not her involvement in the coup; your disagreement seems based on the assumption that the assassination was integral to the coup, and that Catherine was party to both. Unless your source states explicitly that Catherine managed the assassination, the argument's non-existent, and there's no point using the source. Haploidavey (talk) 23:47, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Catherine again
Hiya... why not post your source and its claim at the article talk-page? Others will see it, and (I hope) respond. Even if you don't find agreement, a broader discussion can do no harm. Haploidavey (talk) 20:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello again! I posted a comment on the talk page of Catherine the Great. I included the author, book title, page number, publisher, and date of publication, as you instructed. Thank you again for inviting me to contribute! Ctmuva2000 (talk) 01:11, 17 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Excellent. You're an asset! And it's nice to meet you (per your user-page). Haploidavey (talk) 10:25, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Please continue...
Thanks so much for the very kind note. You're evidently well-motivated, willing to do the research, and - just as importantly - willing to step back even when you've a strong personal opinion on the subject. Wikipedia needs editors like you... (while I'm here, I have to say I agree with you - her involvement seems rather likely - but that's neither here nor there, as far as Wikipedia's concerned). Keep editing, and enjoy. And get in touch as and when you need. By the way, I've particular interests but not what I'd describe as expertise; I've just been editing here for some years, and have picked things up along the way. Just like you. It's not much more than process, patience and care. Haploidavey (talk) 00:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kristina Pimenova (April 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ctmuva2000/Kristina Pimenova and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  20:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Ctmuva2000/Kristina Pimenova has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Ctmuva2000/Kristina Pimenova. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  21:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Forming links
Hello Ctmuva2000, I slightly modified your post on Talk:Kristina Pimenova by changing your bare url links into a format that looks cleaner and follows the conventions as explained in this section of our Manual of Style. That page also shows how to make links that are internal to Wikipedia as well. If you don't like my changes, you are free to revert them or modify if you want to change the "link" word, etc. Normally, we do not refactor talk page comments but I did here as an example to show you how links are properly formed. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  10:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Ctmuva2000/Kristina Pimenova


Hello, Ctmuva2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kristina Pimenova".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 00:46, 19 November 2017 (UTC)