User talk:CubeSat4U

Recent edit to Bellevue murders
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Tushi Talk To Me  03:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Least concern
Hello CubeSat4U,

Thank you for your work. I want to ask you to take great care adding "least concern" to a taxobox (as with Caladenia gracillima and Abrodictyum caudatum). A species that is rated "least concern" in one place may not be so in another. In the case of C. gracillima, it is rated as "least concern" in Queensland but it may also occur in New South Wales - in which case it would most likely have a higher rating ("vulnerable" for example). Note that the Atlas of Living Australia has records from New South Wales but not Queensland! I've left your "NC" edit for the time being until I have other references concerning its distribution.

I have reverted the other edit you made to C. gracillima. Sorry. It is usual to have the common name at the top of the taxobox. If there is no common name, the binomial name is automatically entered in italics. (Binomials must always be in italics.)

Also, I noted your question at the Teahouse. The best way to add you images to pages is to upload them to Commons (as long as you are prepared to have them in the public domain). From there you can add them to Wikipedia.

Keep up the good work. I hope you continue to edit and are not bothered by the occasional criticism. Gderrin (talk) 06:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Archiving can be made automatic
See Help:Archiving a talk page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Please watch out for spam links
http://mangosteentea.co.uk/about is pretty spammy. It done not say much about the tea, lots about their product, and there is all sorts of links to buy. I removed the info from that page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Murph 9000 (talk) 13:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Marfa Lights
I already sent you a thanks, but I wanted to tell you I got great amusement this morning when I saw your edit to Marfa Lights. The one where you removed that addition of "Also it's really just aliens and this is all a load." with the edit comment "Vague, needs examples from references". A good catch and some nice sarcasm. Thank you for a nice laugh with my coffee. --Krelnik (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
North America1000 09:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jody Deming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Europa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Welcome
72bikers (talk) 17:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Yunshui 雲 水 12:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

My sack of puppets
@Murph9000: Hi, I see you have placed someone on here. Please let them know that the account is indeed under my control, & make sure its handled appropriately like all the other ones. You don't need to waste a Checkuser's time & request an investigation this time around, since I doubt it will succeed anyway. By the way, how did you like the name Al Legorhythm? If I do plan on coming back & request an unblock (perhaps in the next few months or even a year or so, so keep your eyes peeled), I would prefer using that account instead of this one. Oh & if would excuse me, I must find a way to force myself away from Wikipedia for now which had been quite unsuccessful for the past few days, since this past week had been particularly busy for me. I'm sure this week had been busy for you too... — Preceding unsigned comment added by CubeSat4U (talk • contribs) 04:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, well thanks for confirming that, coming completely clean is the only way to eventually get back onto Wikipedia without living under a permanent cloud of impending block. The name, yeah, it was clever.  Creating a new account while blocked, not so clever.  The new account hurts your future block appeal, but coming clean now helps it.
 * To properly close this, it would probably be best if you could post a message confirming this using, so that all doubt is removed. Then stop using that account, and stop editing Wikipedia in any way until you successfully appeal one of the blocks.  The only permitted activity while blocked is a low volume of talk on your user talk page directly related to your block and future appeal, but absolutely don't do anything on your talk that could be seen to be disruptive or a waste of time for admins.  So, be careful, as admins have relatively limited patience with talk on blocked accounts.  Ask them respectful, relevant, and necessary questions once, accept their answers, then silently wait until it's an appropriate time to appeal the block.
 * The block applies to you, the person. Coming clean and then completely stopping all editing is a critical part towards eventual unblocking.  That includes editing as an IP user.  Before requesting an unblock, please read Guide to appealing blocks carefully.  In your case, I suspect that you need to wait at least 6 months (with no recidivism), then take the Standard offer, but one of the admins will likely confirm if that's the appropriate route, and how long would be appropriate to wait before requesting an unblock.
 * PING, FYI.
 * Murph 9000 (talk) 05:06, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like you guys would have to close the investigations yourselves, since the auto-block prevented me from doing so. I did the best what I could...for now... CubeSats  4U  05:44, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notice on Al's talk page. Don't worry about closing the case, I've added notes to it, and it's best to leave closing to the SPI-admins.  The notes ensure that your honesty is noted there (thanks), and should help minimise their time.  Thanks.   Murph 9000  (talk) 05:56, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * @Yunshui: Thanks for the informative message. I haven't used this account for very long, Its been almost 6 months since I have used this account. so I thought that the IP address my password was lost. However, since I have logged in to this account successfully, I would like to request a CheckUser to confirm that I, Piano410 was the one who used that IP Address. If this can be done, I would very much appreciate your patience. Thanks, & hope to hear from you soon. As soon as I received the results, I would be happy to wait patiently for another 1-5 years or any quantifiable/definite value that both of us can hopefully agree on through consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CubeSat4U (talk • contribs)

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)